Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

For those interested in old cars.


DDolfelin
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, big jim said:

@russ p there are some pedantic people who write into car magazines!

 

C3EFAC2B-83E1-405D-80F4-7479C75AE9D4.jpg

 

(gonna have to download the March issue now to see the picture!) 

 

I've had this mag about a week and hadn't noticed that! I'd actually forgotten all about writing it , mind I'd had a few beers when I did!

Cheers Jim 

Edited by russ p
  • Like 2
  • Funny 4
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair to the bloke who wrote in if you edit a motoring mag and feel clever enough to comment in such detail on a subject that isn't your field of expertise and then get it wrong you deserve to be corrected! I'm sure they'd have done the same if someone in a railway mag had done the same about a car... ;)

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 minutes ago, Hobby said:

To be fair to the bloke who wrote in if you edit a motoring mag and feel clever enough to comment in such detail on a subject that isn't your field of expertise and then get it wrong you deserve to be corrected! I'm sure they'd have done the same if someone in a railway mag had done the same about a car... ;)

it was still funny though.....

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
18 minutes ago, Hobby said:

To be fair to the bloke who wrote in if you edit a motoring mag and feel clever enough to comment in such detail on a subject that isn't your field of expertise and then get it wrong you deserve to be corrected! I'm sure they'd have done the same if someone in a railway mag had done the same about a car... ;)

 

I knew it would get published as Danny Hopkins the editor is a massive railway enthusiast he used to edit steam railway. 

A few years back I had an issue with a free gift you got for subscribing and he sorted it out , he also said how much he likes 56s .

Really nice bloke 

  • Like 6
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tom q vaxy said:

Very interesting, but I'm not really getting the old car connection. 

 

My own "missed out on" was any of the sad Mk1 And Mk2 Escorts I viewed, and the one I finally bought, 20 years ago when I was after a sub-$1000, easily maintained, commuting hack. I must have looked at half a dozen, from 1300 to 2-litre. They were all a bit knackered, as you'd expect, but all were complete and ran. I ended up with a 2-Litre Ghia Mk2. Rotten as a pear, 2" shorter wheelbase on one side that t'other, and the old Pinto drank almost as much oil as petrol, but, boy, did it go. Really nice handling, even worn out, and possibly the nicest gearbox I've ever tried. It provided me with cheap, reliable transport for 18 months, before I sold it for $250, when my finances had improved a bit. We'll ignore small infractions like the starter motor falling off, one evening, or the string of minor electrical faults caused by corroded connections. 

 

Thing is, 20 years ago these cars were near worthless. Some time in the interim someone seems to have added a zero to their values. I can sort of understand it for the hot GT and RS variants, but even the cooking models seem to have been infected. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I am currently sorting through a big pile of family albums that were passed on by my late mother. Her family, especially on her mother's side, were keen on their motorcycles and cars, between the wars. I am sorting them out  so that I can give my cousins scans of photos that relate to their parts of the family. I have been able to identify a number of the cars that appear in their photos of holidays and day trips. This one has me foxed. Is that an Austin logo on the grill? Not that many makers used grill logos. The shape of the radiator is also a bit of a puzzle, with the flat top to the grill. The height of the bonnet compared with the sides seems high - or the latter low. Maybe that was to give a more sporty look to a tourer version. The four-part wind-screen is another notable feature. I don't think that the fact that it is on the Pendine Sands is necessarily a clue, but who knows. My mum is the young lady on the running board.

Any ideas?

 

Pendine Sands 1936 HMVPEl.jpg

Edited by phil_sutters
Photo in the middle of the text
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
5 minutes ago, stewartingram said:

I reckon that name badge begins with a J and ends with a T - possibly. Could that be Jowett?

 

Stewart

That occurred to me. I must have another look through old car photo sites.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
55 minutes ago, phil_sutters said:

I am currently sorting through a big pile of family albums that were passed on by my late mother. Her family, especially on her mother's side, were keen on their motorcycles and cars, between the wars. I am sorting them out  so that I can give my cousins scans of photos that relate to their parts of the family. I have been able to identify a number of the cars that appear in their photos of holidays and day trips. This one has me foxed. Is that an Austin logo on the grill? Not that many makers used grill logos. The shape of the radiator is also a bit of a puzzle, with the flat top to the grill. The height of the bonnet compared with the sides seems high - or the latter low. Maybe that was to give a more sporty look to a tourer version. The four-part wind-screen is another notable feature. I don't think that the fact that it is on the Pendine Sands is necessarily a clue, but who knows. My mum is the young lady on the running board.

Any ideas?

 

Pendine Sands 1936 HMVPEl.jpg

It is indeed a Jowett, with a flat opposed 2 cylinder side valve water cooled engine rated at 7 HP. It had a 3 speed crash gearbox with a 'reversed' gate. The basic design goes back to the Edwardian period and was continued up to 1953 in the Jowett Bradford van.

  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I have a feeling a late friend passed his driving test - at 17 - in a Bradford van. This was in 1965, and the van was not in great nick, but pre-MOT of course. They thought putting in a seat for the examiner might help. 

  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/03/2020 at 19:04, russ p said:

 

I've had this mag about a week and hadn't noticed that! I'd actually forgotten all about writing it , mind I'd had a few beers when I did!

Cheers Jim 

As someone who did 'station improvements' (i.e. wrecking what would now be highly regarded ornate Victorian detailing) at two city centre Sheffield stations) it would have been more interesting to Know which you referring to !

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 19/03/2020 at 11:59, PhilJ W said:

Your parents were athletes or contortionists then?

Of course you can get loads of children in a Chummy!

 

Elsie and children Blackpool 1925.jpgsorry did you say beget children in a Chummy?

Edited by phil_sutters
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
11 minutes ago, runs as required said:

As someone who did 'station improvements' (i.e. wrecking what would now be highly regarded ornate Victorian detailing) at two city centre Sheffield stations) it would have been more interesting to Know which you referring to !

 

It was a picture of Sheffield in the 70s with lots of period vehicles visible 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...