Jump to content
 

Prototype for everything corner.


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
10 hours ago, Titan said:

 

The last thing you want on a passenger train is the loco buffering up and then snapping the coupling tight when the coach brakes come on. Prior to the brakes being applied, the loco coupling will already be tight due to the springs in the buffers keeping it that way, so if the coach brakes come on first it keeps the coupling tight and there is no snatch. There will be no wheel flats either, as drivers are not in the habit of going straight into emergency application on a normal service stop, so the brakes on the coaches will only have had a gentle application before the loco brakes start to come on in proportion to that of the coaches.

 

But as the driver applies the brake, the first vehicle to react to the decaying brake pipe pressure is the loco, with the last being the rearmost vehicle. Therefore the weight transfer is forward and the coaches buffer up to the loco. To work the way you are saying to keep the couplings in tension, the first vehicle to brake has to be the rear one, the last one to see the drop in pressure....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davexoc said:

 

But as the driver applies the brake, the first vehicle to react to the decaying brake pipe pressure is the loco, with the last being the rearmost vehicle. Therefore the weight transfer is forward and the coaches buffer up to the loco. To work the way you are saying to keep the couplings in tension, the first vehicle to brake has to be the rear one, the last one to see the drop in pressure....

 

None of the above is true. It has been explained very clearly how it works, by people that have been trained on, and work the real life locomotives, and that includes me as I trained on them under BR. This means we are explaining exactly how it is, not opinion.   However what we can't do is understand it for you.

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Michael Hodgson said:

If you want to run a brake van special, you need to have a supply of serviceable brake vans sitting around doing nothing else.

And Vac fitted ones as well. I did a Brake van ride once, 2 vans behind double headed class 37 on the GWSR. It was bumpy and there were about 15 of us on each veranda 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Titan said:

 

None of the above is true. It has been explained very clearly how it works, by people that have been trained on, and work the real life locomotives, and that includes me as I trained on them under BR. This means we are explaining exactly how it is, not opinion.   However what we can't do is understand it for you.

Perhaps some mention of how 'distributors' function in an automatic air brake system may help as well?

 

I know a little of their principle I.e. that they respond (more quickly) to the drop in train brake pipe pressure and vent local reservoirs to reduce the brake application propagation delay, but not enough to offer a more detailed explanation in the context of this discussion. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, leopardml2341 said:

Perhaps some mention of how 'distributors' function in an automatic air brake system may help as well?

 

I know a little of their principle I.e. that they respond (more quickly) to the drop in train brake pipe pressure and vent local reservoirs to reduce the brake application propagation delay, but not enough to offer a more detailed explanation in the context of this discussion. 

Hi Andy,

 

Don't forget DA valves on vacuum systems.

 

https://www.railcar.co.uk/technology/brakes/?page=direct-admission-valve

 

Gibbo.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, rab said:

Having done a brake van run on a preserved railway (25 mph max)

I don't think I'd fancy doing one in the mainline, running at the speeds needed to keep out of the way of service trains.

 

Agree absolutely, a brake van ride on the Epping/Ongar Railway in a Shark gave me a whole new appreciation of, and sympathy for, Goods Guards !

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, caradoc said:

 

Agree absolutely, a brake van ride on the Epping/Ongar Railway in a Shark gave me a whole new appreciation of, and sympathy for, Goods Guards !

To be honest, it was just part of the job. Unless it was an exceptionally rough van, we didn't usually think about it.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, caradoc said:

 

Agree absolutely, a brake van ride on the Epping/Ongar Railway in a Shark gave me a whole new appreciation of, and sympathy for, Goods Guards !

I've done the same at Scunthorpe. But, a BR Shark has only a 9ft wheelbase and were used in a different way to the standard revenue brake van with their 16ft wheelbase. Not good I'm sure, but certainly better to a Shark. I don't know if Sharks were ridden in to a job, or only when in use at a job when movement would be very slow - probably slower than on heritage railways. 

 

Paul

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 03/09/2021 at 08:30, rodent279 said:

You don't see brakevan tours anymore these days.

When was the last run, and is there any reason why it couldn't be done now, on the mainline (apart from the lack of brake vans)?

 

M7 30053 worked a series of trips from Salisbury around the Laverstock Loop on 28th June 1992 using a pair of Queen Mary bogie brake vans.

 

I'm not sure what happened here, I meant to include a link to Terry Foulger's picture but it seems to have posted the image instead.

M7 30053 at Salisbury taken during a NSE Steam Weekend there on 28 June 1992 (1)

Copyright: Terry Foulger / Justin Foulger

https://flickr.com/photos/justinfoulger/49850934776/

Edited by bude_branch
  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 minute ago, bude_branch said:

 

M7 30053 worked a series of trips from Salisbury around the Laverstock Loop in 1992 using a pair of Queen Mary bogie brake vans.

 

920611_salisbury_m7-30053_brk-van-ride | Chris Nevard | Flickr

 

 

Rode them, good trip.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I occasionally spotted at Leeds Central in that era and remember the Q of Scots. Nothing about the various stock manoeuvres has screamed odd at me down the years so I guess the outgoing engine did do the move. Using a shunter/pilot wold have.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, leopardml2341 said:

Perhaps some mention of how 'distributors' function in an automatic air brake system may help as well?

 

I know a little of their principle I.e. that they respond (more quickly) to the drop in train brake pipe pressure and vent local reservoirs to reduce the brake application propagation delay, but not enough to offer a more detailed explanation in the context of this discussion. 

In a standard air brake system, a distributor is a device in every vehicle that uses a drop in the pressure of the train brake pipe to determine how much air is fed to the brake cylinders from the vehicle's air brake reservoir. I would not use the term 'vent' in association with the local reservoir. The air pressure in the brake cylinders is proportional to the drop in brake pipe pressure over the normal operating range.

 

Note that there is some hysteresis in the system: things take time to react. When doing brake trials with new brake pads on HST's we found that although the brake cylinder pressures for full service and emergency applications should be the same; in practice cylinder pressures were always higher for the full service brake application. This was attributed to the hysteresis effect, with the distributor acting more quickly with the faster reduction in brake pipe pressure under an emergency application. (In normal service applications the system is slugged to protect the train against longitudinal dynamic effects. The slugging is different for passenger and goods, hence the goods/passenger changeover control). Although emergency brake applications on normal air braked trains didn't specify a higher brake force, it did specify a faster application.

 

The advantage that a distributor has over the older 'triple valve' is that is allows proportional release, which a triple valve doesn't but otherwise the principle is the same.

 

Some trains - eg HST- had a control signal that operated the brake controller at both ends of the train. This was done to reduce the brake signal propagation time, ie get the brakes applied on all vehicles as quickly as possible.

 

When you need fast application times - suburban multiple units for example - the control signal is electric to every vehicle. Moreover, in an attempt to reduce SPADs that had been attributed to deficiencies in the brake design of 3-step controlled disc braked units, the emergency brake rate was increased from 9%g to 12%g for those vehicles whose bogie designs could accept the higher forces,

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 03/09/2021 at 10:59, Wickham Green too said:

Any trip to Horwich ( or elsewhere ) would have been one way at that date ! .............. oh - by the way, rab, it's an EMU !

Looks like that unit is ready for its last journey - open doors on the first vehicle, and the last one is the wrong way round for normal service...

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

....... not to mention the lack of glass in several windows.

 

According to Ashley Butlin, the last withdrawals were November 1980 and subsequent 1981 & 1982 disposals were to Mayer Newman at Snailwell ( motor coaches & driving trailers ) and Booths in Rotherham ( intermediate trailers - perhaps these had no asbestos ? ) - so I guess the shunter is separating the types.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, rab said:

That could also be an entry for the

 "When the real thing looks like a model" thread

 

Nah! The windows on the 25 look wrong...

 

 

Kev.

  • Like 1
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, montyburns56 said:

Achnasheen

 

FMCCS045 24124 and 270xx Achnasheen

 


A 24/1 AND 27 (which in itself is a bit of a rare bird here) seem overkill here (though theres probably a good reason for it. The other thing that stands out is that the end  is punctuated by an open wagon of some variety. Incredibly little passenger accommodation even for the Kyle line.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
7 hours ago, 60B said:


A 24/1 AND 27 (which in itself is a bit of a rare bird here) seem overkill here (though theres probably a good reason for it. The other thing that stands out is that the end  is punctuated by an open wagon of some variety. Incredibly little passenger accommodation even for the Kyle line.

And seven covered vans stored in a siding seems overkill for such a small station.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...