Jump to content
 


Simond
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, you learn something new old every day.  I thought the “stuff” was called “frisk” but apparently, it’s “frisket” for which there is a Wikipedia page. 

Dave,

 

thanks for the link.

 

Mikkel, 

 

yes, lettering etc is a key challenge.  There are those who can exquisitely signwrite a Z gauge Advert on a car door with shading, but I’m not such a person.  Technology is the route I need to take, technology is of course capable of anything one is prepared to pay for.  The trick is finding & adapting something at reasonable cost to achieve what is wanted.

 

i wonder if an inkjet printer could be adapted for lettering vehicles...  It would be much better than stencils, if it could be made to work...

 

Some kind of universal numerically-controlled 3-axis table, with interchangeable heads, milling/drilling, laser, rivetter, inkjet, watercutter, these might benefit from 2 extra axes to swivel the line of action out of the X-Y plane.  Accuracy in the micron range is achievable, so you’d want that too.  Direct CAD to.CAM conversion in 3D is a necessity, because tool command programming in G Code takes quite a while.
 

what was I saying about  cost vs capability...?
 

 

atb

Simon

Edited by Simond
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Simon,

Apologies if this is too late to be of use.

I was looking through my newly purchased copy of "The 2-8-0 Tank Papers" (Ian Sixsmith, Irwell Press) and noticed three photos that include 35 ton hoists:

p26, Worcester

p43, St Blazey

p61, Worcester

 

None of them is really a shot of the hoist itself, rather the engines under them.

You can see a fair bit of the hoists though, so may be of use.

Cheers

Peter

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • RMweb Gold

More than "a little bit of an update", I think!

 

Lot of atmosphere in the internal shot, I like the loco looming in the distance. The stationary boiler looks like it's of Dean parentage...

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Years ago, I recall a picture in an article on loco construction, in maybe MRC, showing a heap of brass bits that the builder had made & rejected.  It left a mark on me!

 

image.jpg.318193501f6814fb0483223b9cc4ec55.jpg
 

this lot is going in the bin.  If I ever need to make another part, I have the CAD.  I’ll keep the spare louvres, they might find a home somewhere.

 

And slating has started!


image.jpg.4157d15141d3580a41479959f7975baa.jpg

 

its odd, a couple of rows are not lying down flat.  Tiny drop of CA on a cocktail stick in a few places will sort that, I think.


the slates look darker (to me) than the photo.

 

atb

Simon

 

 

  • Like 10
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gents,

 

useful criticism, even if it’s not what I wanted to hear, as I’ve cut 10 sheets of them.
 

The slates are 24 x 12” (Duchess size) and the spacing between them is 0.3mm plus the width of the laser, plus any “burn back”.  They’re difficult to measure but around 0.4mm. I guess that translates to nearly 3/4” in the real world.  It’s a long time since I was on a slated roof, and I’ve no urge to try, but I’m guessing that an eighth to a quarter might be typical for hand cut , hand laid slates.

 

Right ho, we’ll get some more grey card (it’s a strange slightly metallic effect - apparently “pearlescent”) and have a go with just the cut lines.  I’ll need some more violet acrylic to give it a hint of colour too.  

 

They’ll cut quicker, anyway!

 

Watch this space, I currently have no more material to experiment with.

 

cheers

Simon

Edited by Simond
  • Friendly/supportive 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave, we’ll have to see what it looks like when I cut some more.

 

Free to good home

large quantity (about 5500)  of Duchess slates 14 x 7 x 0.35mm thick, 

suitable for 7mm FS (or S7 :) ) 

unfortunately, they are spaced out on their strips...

 

image.jpg.e2f9b0a9384d06224d628d8ddb7a0a70.jpg

 

  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
7 hours ago, Simond said:

Years ago, I recall a picture in an article on loco construction, in maybe MRC, showing a heap of brass bits that the builder had made & rejected.  It left a mark on me!

 

image.jpg.318193501f6814fb0483223b9cc4ec55.jpg
 

this lot is going in the bin.  If I ever need to make another part, I have the CAD.  I’ll keep the spare louvres, they might find a home somewhere.

 

It would be an interesting modelling challenge - build something out of your scraps and off-cuts.

  • Like 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 03/05/2021 at 12:15, daifly said:

Current practice is apparently 1-5mm with 3mm the norm. The edges are more pronounced with the bevelling effect of the edge cutting. 

image.png.655580503c454bb70c6d900c1c4dcdab.png

Dave

They look like Spanish ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...