Jump to content
 

South Pelaw Junction


johndon
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Porcy Mane said:

 

 

Well bog rolled up so I guess that makes me, Healthy, wealthy with good supplies.

 

All good in the world round Finchale way?

Ticker - tee - boo.

Last day working from home today then 3 weeks on Her Majesty's  Secret Service, up the shed, on 80%. Hand me those wire strippers.

Anyway, we shouldn't hijack John's marvelous efforts to entertain us in our confinement, so, arrivedeci, bonny lad. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, RBAGE said:

I'm modelling just a few miles further South on the ECML, at Newton Hall Junction and the build is also benefiting from the confinement. Wiring is moving ahead nicely.

I'm taking advantage of a closure on your line because of the accident at Beamish so will be running iron ore through NH Junction on route to Consett via Relly Mill Junction.

Having tried EM, I threw the towel in, so NH Junction is in 00 gauge.

 

If you get your current trackwork complete, I'm sure a trip to the club house would be considered as essential travel, for the sake of your well being and state of mind. 

 

Your railway sounds very interesting. Are you able to describe and/or show us any more?

Link to post
Share on other sites

newtonhallc1960.jpg.fda4979347e5a73fe3573649e6c6afa7.jpg

 

This Newton Hall Junction. Don't know if there is copyright but source is detailed in bottom right hand corner. 

My mainline will run from just North of the gantry in the South to about signal number 7 in the North. That section is about 20' long.

The branch to Frankland extends around the shed, incorporates Frankland Sidings and stops short of the viaduct over the River Wear.

The branch was the original route into the current Durham station and was the Sunderland to Bishop Auckland Railway.

 

Iron ore trains did run through the junction when the line line through Beamish was closed. That I know for sure. What I'm having trouble confirming is whether they came up the main line or up the Leamside line and then across the branch. I'm going for the branch as the most likely.

 

I'll see if there are any views of the current trackwork that are not too embarrassing. I've used Peco bullhead for the scenic section.

 

Had a bit of a grey moment and posted this in a DCC related topic.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Testing, testing and more testing...

 

It occurred to me this morning that an ideal vehicle for testing the track was my never fully completed Penbits Bogie conversion of the Bachmann Class 24.  Mechanically it is complete but cosmetically, I never finished it as the SLW 24 came along.  As it has no bogie sides, it is great for testing as it is much easier to see what the wheels are doing when going over point work.

 

At the real South Pelaw Junction, the maximum permitted speed was 25mph so no need for express train speeds but I thought I'd run a couple of tests of the curved route (the most complex) of the single slip at speed so here are a couple of short videos of the 24 at speed over the formation.  The track on the left hand end is deliberately dead for now to stop anything from running in to the wall.

 

 

 

 

The 31 still does not always make it through without a derailment but, seeing what the 24 can do, I'm a lot more positive about the accuracy of the track than I was a couple of days ago...

  • Like 7
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another turnout completed (apart from the tie bar and a few chairs that will be fitted after testing):

 

spacer.png

 

Not the best photo as it is against the light and the depth of field isn't great but, hopefully, if shows the flow of the track through this part of the junction:

 

spacer.png

 

  • Like 13
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

With the number of turnouts on the layout, it was inevitable that one would cross a baseboard joint so that had to be dealt with.  I also have a personal dislike of copper clad sleepers at baseboard joins, especially where the track crosses joins at an angle and the copper clad is fitted at 90 degrees to the join rather than the track.

 

So, at the board joins, and this applies to the plain track as well, I've drilled the sleepers out in line with the rails, inserted panel pins, laid the rails across the join and then soldered the rail to the pins as shown below.  In this case, the turnout does not line up with the underlying Templot plan as I discovered I had it in slightly the wrong place and the crossing V ended up right on the baseboard join.

 

spacer.png

 

I used to cut the rails using a cutting disk in a Dremel but this time, in an effort to make the gap as small as possible, I've used a razor saw to split the rails at the joins.  The excess solder and the pins are then ground back using a Dremel allowing for half chairs to be fitted either side of the rail.  This is what the finished article looks like with a first coat of paint (apologies for the quality of the photo but it was taken against the light).

 

spacer.png

 

Not as strong, perhaps, as copper clad as the actual soldered joint is quite small but, for me, it looks a lot better and, whilst the layout is transportable, it won't be moving too often and I'll be fitting end boards to protect the track during transport so I reckon it'll be good enough to keep the rails in place and free of damage...

 

Edited by johndon
  • Like 13
  • Craftsmanship/clever 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/04/2020 at 09:12, johndon said:

With the number of turnouts on the layout, it was inevitable that one would cross a baseboard joint so that had to be dealt with.  I also have a personal dislike of copper clad sleepers at baseboard joins, especially where the track crosses joins at an angle and the copper clad is fitted at 90 degrees to the join rather than the track.

 

So, at the board joins, and this applies to the plain track as well, I've drilled the sleepers out in line with the rails, inserted panel pins, laid the rails across the join and then soldered the rail to the pins as shown below.  In this case, the turnout does not line up with the underlying Templot plan as I discovered I had it in slightly the wrong place and the crossing V ended up right on the baseboard join.

 

spacer.png

 

I used to cut the rails using a cutting disk in a Dremel but this time, in an effort to make the gap as small as possible, I've used a razor saw to split the rails at the joins.  The excess solder and the pins are then ground back using a Dremel allowing for half chairs to be fitted either side of the rail.  This is what the finished article looks like with a first coat of paint (apologies for the quality of the photo but it was taken against the light).

 

spacer.png

 

Not as strong, perhaps, as copper clad as the actual soldered joint is quite small but, for me, it looks a lot better and, whilst the layout is transportable, it won't be moving too often and I'll be fitting end boards to protect the track during transport so I reckon it'll be good enough to keep the rails in place and free of damage...

 

I wuld have extebded the wing rails to the joint to avoid the short lengths. We've had problems with short lenghts in the past and now do everything to avoid them.

  • Agree 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Paul Cram said:

I wuld have extebded the wing rails to the joint to avoid the short lengths. We've had problems with short lenghts in the past and now do everything to avoid them.

 

Thanks Paul, hadn't thought of that, I'll have to see how it goes.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having managed to order the wrong type of chairs track laying is on hold so, while waiting for their replacements to arrive, I've made a start on the scenic formers for the first board.  The original plan was to use polystyrene for this but a trip to B&Q to get some is hardly essential travel so I've gone old school with carboard formers and paper mache with dilute PVA.

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

Edited by johndon
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎25‎/‎04‎/‎2020 at 23:35, johndon said:

Another turnout completed (apart from the tie bar and a few chairs that will be fitted after testing):

 

spacer.png

 

Not the best photo as it is against the light and the depth of field isn't great but, hopefully, if shows the flow of the track through this part of the junction:

 

spacer.png

 

Lovely point work here Johndon...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, johndon said:

BTW, the grass isn't the finished article, just a Noch grass mat used for effect, static grass will be going down.

 

Nice work John......hope you've got Phil booked for the vegetation!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Progress has slowed a little as work has started picking up again but more static grassing has been done and I've been threading chairs on rails for the up and down branch.

 

spacer.png

 

In the meantime, I've picked up a bargain from eBay.

 

DCC sound fitted and with P4 wheels already fitted for little more than the RRP of the standard DCC Ready version, this beast arrived this morning:

 

 

 

Totally inappropriate for the layout (although I may run some 'what if' trains based on the assumption that the steelworks at Consett didn't close in 1980) but as it is one of my favourite loco classes, it was too good a deal to miss out on.

 

It is missing a horn at one end and the brakes have removed to fit the P4 wheels although they can be refitted, the only question now is do I repaint it in Metal Sector Triple Grey or in DB Schenker Red...

 

John

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, johndon said:

Progress has slowed a little as work has started picking up again but more static grassing has been done and I've been threading chairs on rails for the up and down branch.

 

spacer.png

 

In the meantime, I've picked up a bargain from eBay.

 

DCC sound fitted and with P4 wheels already fitted for little more than the RRP of the standard DCC Ready version, this beast arrived this morning:

 

 

 

Totally inappropriate for the layout (although I may run some 'what if' trains based on the assumption that the steelworks at Consett didn't close in 1980) but as it is one of my favourite loco classes, it was too good a deal to miss out on.

 

It is missing a horn at one end and the brakes have removed to fit the P4 wheels although they can be refitted, the only question now is do I repaint it in Metal Sector Triple Grey or in DB Schenker Red...

 

John

 

Loadhaul!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...