Jump to content
 

SOS Junction. If anything happens would someone wake me up please..


Mallard60022
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Captain Kernow said:

Are you still looking for a suitable bridge source, Phil?

How about good old Superquick? - https://www.superquick.co.uk/red-brick_tunnel-entrance

Thanks Kapn. I had considered that, however this damn Bridge is going to be right in yer face and next to the actual entrance to the Room of Dreams! (That is, the loft hole). 

Sadly it needs to pass the view from 30 cm test and good old S Quick is a bit 'flat', if beautifully coloured. I used a S Quick one, plus all sorts, for the Station/Yards West Underbridge as that isn't so important (to me). Looks OK but....still not absolutely sure; it could be replaced. How fussy can I be? 

I think I am going to have to get off my arse and use a moulded material lamination on the lazer cut thing (flat and hardly 3D) I have adapted to fit the position. This would mean actually having to do some modelling/artistic/architectural thinking and work. 

In your experience, does that in the lower picture, look like a mix of Red Brick (horizontal Road Wall top and vertical Buttresses and Barrell, with perhaps the Ringstone face? ), and stone elsewhere? I can use RTR stuff for that but I may have to scribe the rest...argghh! I could copy the Stubby 'Hungry Caterpillar mouth' method if I am capable.

Presumably, 60 years ago that bridge would have looked in better condition, with suitable sooty weathering?

P

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Actually, doing a good enlargement of that second picture shows pretty good detail. It looks to me that it includes a single arc Brick course 'Barrell front' under a 4/5 course Ringstone arc. It also shows the Buttresses splay out as they 'drop'. 

A frontage not unlike this one...

image.png.ca6f7d73c84654e6e2466d04fc31ecf9.png

P

Edited by Mallard60022
  • Like 5
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
16 hours ago, Mallard60022 said:

In your experience, does that in the lower picture, look like a mix of Red Brick (horizontal Road Wall top and vertical Buttresses and Barrell, with perhaps the Ringstone face? ), and stone elsewhere?

I'd say you're right there, Herr Quackmeister.

 

Possibly one way is to part-scribe (eg. the stone work) in something like DAS and use embossed bricks for that part, all on a thick card base?

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 minutes ago, Captain Kernow said:

I'd say you're right there, Herr Quackmeister.

Possibly one way is to part-scribe (eg. the stone work) in something like DAS and use embossed bricks for that part, all on a thick card base?

Anything thick suits me old bean. There rea plenty of excellent items to look at on RMW but it isn't as stony as many Bridges down real west.

Mucho grassio. Not an urgent job so probably get done in 2024! Bricking it when stoned would be the way forward.

Ar$£

  • Like 6
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 18/07/2021 at 17:43, Mallard60022 said:

Actually, doing a good enlargement of that second picture shows pretty good detail. It looks to me that it includes a single arc Brick course 'Barrell front' under a 4/5 course Ringstone arc. It also shows the Buttresses splay out as they 'drop'. 

A frontage not unlike this one...

image.png.ca6f7d73c84654e6e2466d04fc31ecf9.png

P

 

Morning Duckychops.

 

Interesting photo, certainly looks like the bridge has been strengthened after closure of the line. Extra brick courses added to the arch ring and abutments on the face but could be concrete behind that. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, 2ManySpams said:

 

Morning Duckychops.

 

Interesting photo, certainly looks like the bridge has been strengthened after closure of the line. Extra brick courses added to the arch ring and abutments on the face but could be concrete behind that. 

Yup, that would make sense.

On the actual one I suspect NR (or whatever) have kept it in reasonable nick over the years.

Have you enlarged my post picture of that one to have a shufty?

P

Edited by Mallard60022
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
55 minutes ago, Mallard60022 said:

There was about to be, as Google Earth took that pic from the Cab of a Bristol Lowdekka.

P

Now would that there Lowdekka be a LD or a FS or a FLF? Or ever rarer a LDS, a FSF, a LDL, or a FL ?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
50 minutes ago, Flying Fox 34F said:

Western or Southern National FLF then!

 

Paul

Yup but Western I think as Google can't afford The SN Heritage Group's fees:unsure::D

More seriously, I have a note somewhere of a service that operated locally and actually called at Seaton Junction and it was a WN LD IIRC? I think it might have only been 3 days a week but that might have been 3 calls a day? Can't remember at the moment. I know there was definitely a cross Country Bus, Taunton I think it was, to Seaton or Lyme. Might even still run that route? Edit: yes it does and there are two; 885 and 20, both to/from Seaton

P

Edited by Mallard60022
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Found on an old post from 2015!!!!!

Posted September 17, 2015

I have just found another Devon General timetable from 1955 which I had forgotten about, it shows a bus service to Seaton Jn.

There is a service No. 52,  Exeter - Honiton - Seaton which ran three days a week,

I wonder how long after 1955 it ran?  It does not appear in the 1965 timetable.

Runs W S Su

Exeter  (Paul St)        9.5         1.5pm        5.5pm

Seaton Jn                  10.39      2.39pm     6.44 pm

Seaton                       10.57      2.57pm     7.2pm 

                                    

The service from Taunton to Seaton was the 213 Western National, via Axminster. 

post-138-0-55861600-1444215130_thumb.jpg.971e99b139f858d998c3df49c31cd6b7.jpg

 

P

 

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
39 minutes ago, Mallard60022 said:

Found on an old post from 2015!!!!!

Posted September 17, 2015

I have just found another Devon General timetable from 1955 which I had forgotten about, it shows a bus service to Seaton Jn.

There is a service No. 52,  Exeter - Honiton - Seaton which ran three days a week,

I wonder how long after 1955 it ran?  It does not appear in the 1965 timetable.

Runs W S Su

Exeter  (Paul St)        9.5         1.5pm        5.5pm

Seaton Jn                  10.39      2.39pm     6.44 pm

Seaton                       10.57      2.57pm     7.2pm 

                                    

The service from Taunton to Seaton was the 213 Western National, via Axminster. 

post-138-0-55861600-1444215130_thumb.jpg.971e99b139f858d998c3df49c31cd6b7.jpg

 

P

 

One of my old school buses.:)

 

The occasional variations of the 213 that ran via Seaton Jn after the branch closed would (if covered by double deckers) have used LDs. IIRC FLFs didn't run south of Axminster until after the Rail Replacement figleaf stopped running and the old river bridge at Whitford had been replaced.

 

Also, there were only a few through trips between Seaton and Taunton each day. Most were just Seaton-Axminster or Seaton-Chard. North of Chard was strictly WN's patch so the full length 213 was theoretically a joint SN/WN service.

 

John

Edited by Dunsignalling
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mallard60022 said:

Found on an old post from 2015!!!!!

Posted September 17, 2015

I have just found another Devon General timetable from 1955 which I had forgotten about, it shows a bus service to Seaton Jn.

There is a service No. 52,  Exeter - Honiton - Seaton which ran three days a week,

I wonder how long after 1955 it ran?  It does not appear in the 1965 timetable.

Runs W S Su

Exeter  (Paul St)        9.5         1.5pm        5.5pm

Seaton Jn                  10.39      2.39pm     6.44 pm

Seaton                       10.57      2.57pm     7.2pm 

                                    

The service from Taunton to Seaton was the 213 Western National, via Axminster. 

post-138-0-55861600-1444215130_thumb.jpg.971e99b139f858d998c3df49c31cd6b7.jpg

 

P

 


Phil,

 

Living where you do, you could always pop over Dunham Bridge and have a ride on this one, when the LVVS have a Running Day!

 

569A8212-A0A5-4A13-A327-65D026AA227B.jpeg.4189f9442b834db4c1f03bcece6bb8b2.jpeg

 

Photo copyright of LVVS.

 

Paul

  • Like 8
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 20/07/2021 at 20:33, Flying Fox 34F said:


Phil,

 

Living where you do, you could always pop over Dunham Bridge and have a ride on this one, when the LVVS have a Running Day!

 

569A8212-A0A5-4A13-A327-65D026AA227B.jpeg.4189f9442b834db4c1f03bcece6bb8b2.jpeg

 

Photo copyright of LVVS.

 

Paul

I am looking forward to their next event when they can get past this bloomin Covid thing.

Lovely idea thanks.

P

  • Like 2
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Today I did another Bridge.....but not the one discussed here the last week!

Good old Peco Single Track one (well, two Kits actually) + some Balsa card and a lot of Evostick, for the Branch overbridge (intended scenic break).

It fits and that's about all I can say. 

It is going to have to be a scratch built one for this Incline Bridge 466. That means I have actually got to do some drawings and some thinking; grief!

I may be some time.

P

  • Like 3
  • Friendly/supportive 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I have decided to do the Fiddle yard end scenic break bridge with a Peco product. I think it looks ok but may need some painting up yet.

20210728_102529.jpg.b7aada97d62d099118c8d92629602669.jpg

412397848_20210728_102940(1).jpg.2b8a15590030cf02c4a7a0e2b9199899.jpg

Fiddle yard to the left will be covered by Pods. Space beyond the bridge will be built up a bit to screen the FY entry/exit; I have started that with some scrap plastic walling.

 

The other Bridge I have been fussing with is supposed to represent this:

image.png.c8e07f8f2c29687d77952ca091b30899.png.328c213c9b24cc3aa76d96e1fa8a96ac.png

Ignore the brash, fresh, unweathered card  experiment as the bricks are wrong and the arch bricks are too big (just paper from a Superquick one and it should be 4/5 courses anyway). It is the overall face proportion I am trying to represent as the arch is rounder than the Peco product.

674922520_20210728_102120(1).jpg.8df5fc88e499dfd95345daab020adcec.jpg

Still not sure, but when I use embossed plastic card it should be easier to 'mould' and paint and  bend to the subtle shape required? Ballast and bits here and the two slopes of the Cutting sides will enhance it too of course.

I must get around to fitting the N15 with the necessary detailing parts, however that is for much later.

Edit: after some thinking I suspect that arch is too 'round'. It needs to be more of an ellipse if that is the term? Between the Peco shape and mine I think.

P

 

 

 

Edited by Mallard60022
Additional comment.
  • Like 14
  • Agree 2
  • Round of applause 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Second attempt at starting the Incline approach to Stubby's Hungry Caterpillar. 

20210805_165252.jpg.4bd4f3493b939ca73cd029694871591b.jpg

 

The Caterpillar in Metamorphosis; Stubby will cry. It looks very messy but is just tacked together so if there is an incident I just take it to bits! Out of site, out of mind.

20210805_165303.jpg.7061fc8366ca9cafa2a3a9030c503695.jpg

 

Thus the Tunnel is almost dark enough and will be when I have draped a lightweight blanket over it and installed the cleaning brush.

20210805_165706.jpg.e05150dcddae05486c493333962aabd4.jpg

 

My Fine mesh behind the Tunnel Portal will just be grass and the Tape & Polystyrene embankment is so I can plant stuff as required. This little section is not moveable. There will be a removable lid behind that bit of bank above the Tunnel Mouth, filled with Trees and Bushes, as per the Prototype.

 

 

The rest of the Incline embankment will be a Pod with Lid and all removable for access to the Fiddle Sidings.

 

 

Edited by Mallard60022
  • Like 14
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
  • Round of applause 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...