Jump to content
 

Dave F's photos - ongoing - more added each day


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DaveF said:

 

Mainly Newcastle Central station today together with one of Newburn level crossing which is on the line to Scotswood bridge along the north side of the Tyne.

 

The Newburn level crossing photo was taken during a  railtour of lines around Newcastle and Gateshead, "The Tyneside Venturer", which used Class 101s.

 

 

466178315_Newcastle31234upecsJuly88J9625.jpg.41805f2f0fddefcdfdb3fbe133e03373.jpg

Newcastle 31234 up ecs July 88 J9625.jpg

 

 

1948101839_Newcastle47597ecsHeatontoNewcastleAug90J11598.jpg.70a5cc2c3034dcba34b9456112a14167.jpg

Newcastle 47597 ecs Heaton to Newcastle Aug 90 J11598.jpg

 

 

321567320_Newcastle43064EdinburghtoKingsXApril91J11867.jpg.18f8f3f85015c45ee3b5a1c67230a360.jpg

Newcastle 43064 Edinburgh to Kings X April 91 J11867.jpg

 

 

377261750_Newcastle11thJune91Class143C15919.jpg.8607db1a9bb0f41432d9199662d580a9.jpg

Newcastle Class 143  11th June 91 C15919.jpg

1210994166_Newburnlevelcrossingvieweast14thSept85C7181.jpg.7bac28424e6ead8d75ba631703ac97f8.jpg

Newburn level crossing view east 14th Sept 85 C7181.jpg  The train is behind me, having gone across the crossing.

 

 

David

 

 

Hi David

 

Nostalgic pics as always. The last pic of the level crossing at Newburn is interesting. I reckon there isn't a single trace of any of the things in the picture left there now.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I am afraid that on the level crossing stupidity thread

they might take exception to you standing on the line to take photos, as setting a bad example - mind you there seem to be plenty of people who don't need an example, judging by some of the photos and videos which have been posted - and after all you are behind the train and the gates are closed.

Jonathan

Edited by corneliuslundie
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, David. I like the Newcastle and Newburn level crossing photo’s, all of which are of interest. In J11598, at Newcastle, with 47597, on an empty coaching stock working from Heaton to Newcastle, in August, 1990, you can see how the number 9 appears to be too tall. I dread to think what someone would say if that was a model.

 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
37 minutes ago, Market65 said:

Good evening, David. I like the Newcastle and Newburn level crossing photo’s, all of which are of interest. In J11598, at Newcastle, with 47597, on an empty coaching stock working from Heaton to Newcastle, in August, 1990, you can see how the number 9 appears to be too tall. I dread to think what someone would say if that was a model.

 

With warmest regards, 

 

 Rob.

 

They would show you Dave's picture and say it was modelled true to the prototype! 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, corneliuslundie said:

I am afraid that on the level crossing stupidity thread

they might take exception to you standing on the line to take photos, as setting a bad example - mind you there seem to be plenty of people who don't need an example, judging by some of the photos and videos which have been posted - and after all you are behind the train and the gates are closed.

Jonathan

I was perfectly safe, for the reasons given below.

 

The line had been closed to traffic for some time, the train was the tour dmu.  It's front buffers were a few inches from a tree growing in the track.

 

We were accompanied by BR staff who organised our detraining via sets of steps and gave us permission to stand on the line.

 

I think that in order to avoid any future controversy I will avoid posting any more photos taken on level crossings or elsewhere on railway property even though I always made sure I had permission to be there and take photos.

 

David

  • Like 3
  • Friendly/supportive 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see an issue. Those of us who have followed this brilliant thread for some time know you always had permissions as you've always made it clear. I would hate it to stop you posting certain photos.

 

Martyn

  • Like 4
  • Agree 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, corneliuslundie said:

I am afraid that on the level crossing stupidity thread

they might take exception to you standing on the line to take photos, as setting a bad example - mind you there seem to be plenty of people who don't need an example, judging by some of the photos and videos which have been posted - and after all you are behind the train and the gates are closed.

Jonathan

As Dave stated, he / they had not only permission, but were escorted by BR Staff, and were decamped safely. No big issue, no rules broken, no danger to any human being.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
24 minutes ago, mullie said:

I don't see an issue. Those of us who have followed this brilliant thread for some time know you always had permissions as you've always made it clear. I would hate it to stop you posting certain photos.

 

Martyn

 

10 minutes ago, Andrew P said:

As Dave stated, he / they had not only permission, but were escorted by BR Staff, and were decamped safely. No big issue, no rules broken, no danger to any human being.

 

To be honest I can see both sides of the "argument" about posting some photos.

 

In the early 70s I was involved in railway preservation for a time and was horrified by the risks some photographers (and others) took.  So I have always thought about which photos I upload.

 

I think I learnt a lot about safety, especially keeping myself of out of the way of moving things (and seeing what other people were doing), as a teenager when I learnt to drive narrow gauge locos (steam and diesel) and traction engines and steam rollers - all on private lines/land.

 

I thought about it even more once I was a little older and helped drive traction engines on roads to rallies.

I also had to think about safety at work - I was responsible for aspects of the health and safety of over 2,500 people.

 

Incidentally I also often had to decide on what photography was allowed at work - in general terms it wasn't!

 

David

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

My feeling is that Dave should continue posting but with the occasional caveat to remind those viewing that they were taken legitimately and the dangers of playing round (such as making videos!) on open railway lines.

Sorry to have caused an issue. I am just aware that there are some stupid people around.

Jonathan

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Hi David, nice photos as usual, thanks for posting. A query though, in your description of the curves at Morpeth, have you got the "eastern" and "western" ends mixed up?

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
53 minutes ago, iands said:

Hi David, nice photos as usual, thanks for posting. A query though, in your description of the curves at Morpeth, have you got the "eastern" and "western" ends mixed up?

As Captain Mainwaring might say:

"I wondered who would be the first to notice that".

 

I've no idea how I got that wrong, I've now corrected it.

 

Thanks,

 

David

  • Like 2
  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, keefer said:

1903 RCH Junction Diagram of Morpeth:

Screenshot_20210325-194626_Chrome.jpg.c83f747943905cd1fcf7e7160178637c.jpg

 

Thanks for this.

 

Of course it does not show the curve from the north to the Blyth and Tyne forming the triangle as that was only opened in 1980.

 

When the NBR line was built it connected directly with the Blyth and Tyne, the connection to the north side of the station replaced it when the Blyth and Tyne was bought by the NER.

 

David

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, David. I like the Morpeth photo’s which are all of interest. In J7162, the class 254 HST, is actually 254013, rather than 254027, on a down service in August, 1980.

 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
10 hours ago, Market65 said:

Good evening, David. I like the Morpeth photo’s which are all of interest. In J7162, the class 254 HST, is actually 254013, rather than 254027, on a down service in August, 1980.

 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.


I’ve never been to Morpeth (only through it a couple of times) so I’m not that familiar with the layout but in that picture, if the line on the left is the down goods loop, wouldn’t the HST be an up service?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...