Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
On ‎23‎/‎06‎/‎2020 at 17:34, Stubby47 said:

Verdict. 

Much better than this morning after the very short session on the rolling road.

I think it will improve with more running in, so overall happy with the purchase.

 

Whilst putting the loco back in its box, I happened, by chance and not intentionally I assure you, to pass a glance over some text printed on a piece of accompanying  paper that appeared to be …. instructions.... 

 

I accept this was completely the wrong thing to do and will sit myself on the naughty step for the rest of the day.

 

However, I did take in the proffered suggestion that the loco be run for 30 minutes in each direction and then lubricated.

 

We all know instructions are merely some marketing bod's idea of "added value", but in this case there might be some justification in at least considering thinking about the possibility of maybe self-debating whether this is a worthwhile endeavour, or not.

  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  • Friendly/supportive 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stubby47 said:

 

We all know instructions are merely some marketing bod's idea of "added value", but in this case there might be some justification in at least considering thinking about the possibility of maybe self-debating whether this is a worthwhile endeavour, or not.

Now come on Stubby, we were all warned about the dangers of self debating when we were young, no matter how worthwhile the endeavour felt at the time.  :stop:

  • Funny 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
30 minutes ago, woodenhead said:

Now come on Stubby, we were all warned about the dangers of self debating when we were young, no matter how worthwhile the endeavour felt at the time.  :stop:

Which is why so many of us now wear glasses. 

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Funny 5
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, Stubby47 said:

.... in this case there might be some justification in at least considering thinking about the possibility of maybe self-debating whether this is a worthwhile endeavour, or not.

Have you been taking lessons from Captain Kernow?

 

 

  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, woodenhead said:

Now come on Stubby, we were all warned about the dangers of self debating when we were young, no matter how worthwhile the endeavour felt at the time.  :stop:

I could make a comment about a mass of people, but that would go against Rob's family friendly ideals.

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
10 minutes ago, Ramblin Rich said:

Have you been taking lessons from Captain Kernow?

 

 

 

I may, or not, be in a position to clarify or refute that accusation.  

 

Possibly.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Funny 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
10 hours ago, Porcy Mane said:

 

Dare I suggest this plan:  (Scurries away sheepishly).

 

Goats.jpg.9068e86ab5d2c49fa720ffe4d81c3f37.jpg

 

Very kind of you Porky but I have no interest at all in the railways of Oldham. 

 

Thank you all the same. 

 

Rob. 

  • Funny 1
  • Friendly/supportive 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NHY 581 said:

 

Very kind of you Porky but I have no interest at all in the railways of Oldham. 

 

Thank you all the same. 

 

Rob. 

 

Probably for the best, I think we have all read that disturbing story further back in the thread about the chap who had his Woodend that close to Goats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
6 hours ago, NHY 581 said:

 

Very kind of you Porky but I have no interest at all in the railways of Oldham. 

 

Thank you all the same. 

 

Rob. 

 

Me neither, but I have filed this section away in my "plans and ideas" folder:
image.png.9487b27b9dcb08837d4aff873506eb09.png

 

Two sidings, both going into the building, which also provides the back-scene, a run-round and a line continuing under a scenic break. The exit to the mainline could become a headshunt on a layout, or if kept as an exit would need a bit of thought to disguise. Possibilities, possibilities.... thanks Porky. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
24 minutes ago, petethemole said:

The line to the right of the sidings crosses the road on the level.  If it was under a road bridge it wouldn't be shown on an OS map.

Hi there,

 

As it's an 'old' map I would agree with you as there seems to have been a greater degree of diligence when recording the information.  More contemporary maps, e.g 1970s onward, can sometimes contain 'inaccuracies'.  This was something I discovered in a couple of jobs I had in the first few years after leaving school.  My 'favourite' was a mid-80s review of a local map that contained at least one road, and bridge, that had been demolished in the 60s; despite that colleagues did try to drive along/over them ....

 

Regards,

 

Alex.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The basic principle with OS maps is they show what can be seen from above, so railway tracks, for example, will not show under a bridge, tunnel, or an overall trainshed roof.  I spent a lot of time before retirement using digitised historic OS maps on a GIS system (Mapinfo) as a research tool.  The  last manually surveyed maps were revised about 1933, so some mid/late 1930s urban developments  that were destroyed in  WW2 bombing never showed on OS maps. Post war the manually surveyed series were replaced by maps based on aerial survey carried out in 1946-47. Erratic updating became fairly common from the '50s onwards.

  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Mange Tout.

 

Project X is taking shape. ( in my woolly head) 

 

In connection with this, I  have acquired another locomotive. 

 

 

I thank you. 

 

 

Rob. 

Edited by NHY 581
  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...