Coach bogie Posted July 15, 2015 Share Posted July 15, 2015 It was suggested that they had access to larger, better quality prints, so the details would have been clearer than in the photos in the book (which are still very good). I would second the suggestion of using Harris since his volume has the complete(?) lot lists rather than Russell's rather scattergun approach. Adrian They do. The largest being a 30x20" blow up. Most of the original prints for scanning were 10X8" prints. Mike Wiltshire Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.