Jump to content
 

firebirduk

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by firebirduk

  1. I've seen that Bulmers imported apples from France and transported them by rail from the docks to their plant. It seems initially they used HTO/HTV hoppers. I was wondering:

    1) Was there a consistent number of wagons in each rake?

    2) Were the hoppers covered or left open?

    3) Any consistent motive power on the freights?

     

    I know later they used ferry wagons however this seems to be a little late for my interest (late 60s/early 70s).

     

    Thanks,

     

    Tim.

     

     

    Hi Tim

     

    Between 1964-1966, not sure of the exact year, Bulmers ran short of cider apples and brought in a train of open wagons filled and uncovered to Barton Station.

     

    Hope this helps.

     

    Mike Spence

  2. Shawplan Lazerglase

     

    I don't know this supplier and I'm not getting on very well with the website.  I'm looking for illustrations.

     

    It seems to me that if one is dissatisfied with RTR glazing, this has more to do with the thickness of the plastic body than anything else.  In other words, if your prototype was not 'flush glazed' what you really would like to do is file down the inside of the RTR coach until placing the window material behind it produces the right pre-flushglaze effect .  I see why SE Flushglaze went the way they did, but it leaves a kind of bulbous effect, regardless of whether you set them back or press them in fully.

     

    In other words, if the thickness of the plastic was less, then the standard RTR method would be OK.  The new Hornby Colletts are fine in this respect, IMO..

     

     

    SHAWPLAN 2 Upper Dunstead Road, Langley Mill, Nottingham NG16 4GR http://www. shawplan.com 01773 718648

     

    If you are still a member of the Scalefour Society then input SHAWPLAN into the search box!

     

    Mike Spence

  3. Great to see a poll for toplights……………….. unfortunately not so good if you model pre Great War!

     

    As my modeling is fixed at August 1914,  the majority of Diagrams needed are not in the list so I am left with 2 or 3 choices so unable to poll.

     

    The following list has been taken from Jim Russell’s books:

     

    Class                      Diagram                  Year

    1st                               A9                                1908

    1st                               A10                              1914

     

    3rd                               C28                              1907

    3rd                               C29                              1909

    3rd                               C30                              1910

    3rd                               C31                              1911-13

     

    Brake 3rd                    D45                              1908-09

    Brake 3rd                    D46                              1910-11

    Brake 3rd                    D47                              1911-22

    Brake 3rd                    D48                              1910

    Brake 3rd                    D49                              1911

    Brake 3rd                    D51                              1912-13

    Brake 3rd                    D52                              1912-22

    Brake 3rd                    D57                              1914

     

    Brake Compo             E82                              1907-08

    Brake Compo             E83                              1907

    Brake Compo             E87                              1910

    Brake Compo             E94                              1912

    Brake Compo             E95                              1913

    Brake Compo             E99                              1914

     

    Compo                        E85                              1908-09

    Compo                        E88                              1911-12

    Compo                        E93                              1912-13

    Compo                        E98                              1914

     

    Slip                              F14                              1908

    Slip                              F15                              1909

     

    Kitchen                       H16                              1908

     

    Brake                          K18                              1911

    Brake                          K19                              1914         

     

    If I have transcribed in error I apologize in advance as I have mislaid my Michael Harris tome.

     

    Mike Spence

    • Like 1
  4. I could be wrong but I thought that the lot A112 Intermediate tenders were 3500 gallon capacity.

     

    I believe that one of them ran behind a 2251 and is pictured in the GWR Journal issue (issue 24 or 25 IIRC) on the class. I think it was 3207. That is the only photo I can think of off the top of my head. That is, assuming I am not getting my tender types muddled (bit of a minefield). :scratchhead:

     

    > I am trying to find out which tender was paired with La Farance.

     

    > RCTS states that 102 was paired with a 4000 gallon tender in 1903 when 

    it was taken into stock. I do not think a rebuilt tender could have 

    been used since no 4000 gallon tenders were built before 1900 and I 

    think it unlikely that one would come in for major work so soon. Of the 

    total number built, the last 4 were built between 1902-1904 specifically 

    for engines 97, 98, 100 & 171. That leaves tender nos: 1456-61 (built 

    in 1900) and 1509-18 (built in 1901) as the only possible candidates. I 

    find it hard to believe that a company as frugal as the GW kept 

    expensive tenders lying about waiting for engines to be coupled to for 

    years so logic would suggest that a 4000 gallon tender was not used.

     

    Do we know what locos tenders 1456-1461 (blt 1900) and 1509-1518 (blt 

    1901) were paired with? I guess it is possible that one of these tenders 

    came into Swindon Works because its loco needed work and so it was 

    paired with "La France" 102?

     

    This is from Raymond Walley The Great Western Railway email list

    who is building 102 La France as delivered in 1903, so, hoping collective wisdom will help.

     

    Mike Spence

×
×
  • Create New...