Jump to content
 

cpbell

Members
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cpbell

  1. 8 hours ago, Roy Langridge said:

    Only just heard about this via the BBC news. My sympathy to all affected and my hopes that such an event never happens again. Not sure what else to say, I am lost for words. 

     

    Roy

    Same here - heard this earlier today and it stunned me.  I'll be donating via. the JustGiving site tomorrow morning.

    • Like 2
  2. ER had both, I doubt than they kept then together so you were likely to have a mix. Without handy access to Longworth I cannot confirm the exact ratio but at least 2/3rds of the TSOs would have been Mk2Ds. 

     

    The Mk2Fs were latter additions to enable all remaining non-a/c stock to be cascades or withdrawn e.g. Various Mk2a, a/b Mk1 non kitchen dining cars  (RSO, RUO 10xx and 36xx) and Mk1 Met-cam Pullman

    Apologies for asking so many questions!  It sounds as though it would be reasonable to run a 2d TSO and a 2f version in the same rake.  What was the situation with BSOs af far as you're aware?  Presumably a 2d version would be more accurate in a rake which already includes 2 2fs (FO and TSO)?

  3. Most of the ER HST fleet would have been delivered by early 1979 and the only loco hauled day stock would have been the York semi fasts. 

     

    The ECML Mk2 a/c stock was mostly MK2Ds with some later Mk2F strengthening lots of TSO's (and possibly FO's). I cannot see any Mk2Es allocated from new.

     

    The sets varied but by the end of the 70's it could be BSO, TSOs, RB/RU(B), FO, FK, BFK  with the occasional BG instead.

    Might I ask, for clarity, whether you're saying that the TSOs were 2d or 2f, please?  I have Hornbu 2d TSOs and a BSO, but will I need to replace them with the Bachmann 2f versions for accuracy?

×
×
  • Create New...