Jump to content
 

drgj

Members
  • Posts

    573
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by drgj

  1. I saw this episode. At the entrance to the buildings I could see various wagons plus a Tartan Arrow CCT. Inside there were rows of three hole wagon wheels and brake cylinders plus a 16 ton mineral wagon. I didn't know there was a wagon works at Stonebridge. There were also scenes with raised concrete railway fly overs or flying junctions which had strange undulating concrete underneath them. if they were  also at Stonebridge could they be inclines leading to coal drops?

     

    Dave

    • Agree 1
  2. Thanks for your reply. Will have a look at your page. Yes the rods on mine also have the horizontal sag which doesn't look very prototypical. Does your conversion still allow the loco to negotiate the same radius curves?

     

    Dave

  3. I did post this in the drive systems forum. I tried to delete that one but coudn't.

     

    I have an early Bachmann O8 . It runs very smoothly slowly but at higher speeds not so well (I suppose higher speed is not strictly needed but was just testing it. I found that as the loco moves, the coupling rod on one side flicks  back and forth along the length of the centre wheel crank pin ( looking from above). On close inspection the crank pin on one end wheel is not vertical compared with the surface of the crank/ balance weight or maybe the whole balance weight is off.  Is this fixable? I notice on the Bachmann site that you have to buy the whole wheel set and cranks/ coupling rods.

     

    Thanks

    Dave

  4. I have an early Bachmann O8 . It runs very smoothly slowly but at higher speeds not so well (I suppose higher speed is not strictly needed but was just testing it. I found that as the loco moves, the coupling rod on one side flicks  back and forth along the length of the centre wheel crank pin ( looking from above). On close inspection the crank pin on one end wheel is not vertical compared with the surface of the crank/ balance weight or maybe the whole balance weight is off.  Is this fixable? I notice on the Bachmann site that you have to buy the whole wheel set and cranks/ coupling rods.

     

    Thanks

    Dave

  5. Does anyone have any pictures of open wagons in which the  loads are visible? There must have been quite a variety. The 50s, 60s and 70s  are the decades I am interested in. I would like to have a go at modelling some.

    Thanks, 

    Dave

  6. That green version certainly looks very nice indeed and is the best looking livery . The blue one  is how I  remember the 31s, but I think that the locos are a bit too archaic looking for the later liveries which don't suit them at all. In fact, I think that that all the first generation locos look awful in the later liveries.

     

    Dave

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  7. I measured between commutator segments and the readings were just about equal. I took the magnet out and could lift it by touching it with a screwdriver and raising. Probably good enough?

     

    My other Lima locos run pretty well.  They sit for just as long without use and are ok.

     

    There are strong neo magnets available on ebay for about £12 plus p&p but I am not convinced they would make a difference.

     

    I have just realised that there is no capacitor between the brush holders. Would this make difference to running as well as causing radio interference?

     

    Dave

  8. I have a very slow running Lima DMU. I have done all  the normal cleaning of the commutator,  axles, wheels and gears and then  relubing at the usual points.  I have not had this problem on any other Lima bogie. Would a new magnet cure it?

     

    Thanks

  9. I meant to post a pic of my Lima D1957 with the new yellow paint and smaller arrows. Here it is. I extended the yellow warning panel further round the sides and the smaller double arrows fit in properly.  i also the front glazing from the moulding and moved them forward for a more flush glazed look like in the other 47 pic earlier in the thread.

     

    Dave

    IMGP4031.JPG

    • Like 5
  10. I used microstrip to form the cantrail on my similar conversion. 

     

    The only trouble with this conversion is that the BG is too narrow for this coach. Should it not be the same width as other LMS passenger stock?  The   Comet Stove R I built is too wide and should be the width of the BG! Put me right if I am wrong.

     

    Dave

    kitchen (3).JPG

    • Like 5
  11. Thanks for the answers and pictures.  Apapa was the only one I saw with this style of name that I can recall. 

     

    Railtec do a sheet of unofficial class 40 names and there are several in this white style along with the other types so maybe some others got the treatment, too. Apapa in the style I am interested in wasn't on the sheet, however, so they made me up a custom pair. Without me saying the Steve got the name Apapa in exactly the right spot above the number like in the above photo from Jeremy C. Maybe I only need to use one!

     

    Dave

  12. Does anyone have any photos of this style of unofficial name on class 40s?  I would particulary like a pic of the number at the non radiator end.  I have a pic I took in the late 70s of the  Apapa name and number at the radiator end.  I would like to see the other  side because I am doing a model of Apapa but there is  the  bolted on plate that gets in the way  of applying  the letters if the name and number is applied in the postion shown in  earlier 70s pics of just the plain number.

     

    Thanks

     

    Dave

×
×
  • Create New...