Jump to content
 

Ardmore

Members
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ardmore

  1. When we began looking for a new home, my wife was quite insistent that it had to have a room that was large enough to house the layout. I wasn't going to argue with that, and when we found a place that suited our needs, the basement came with a games room and pool table as well! The layout is 16' X 12' and it fits into the available space with about 2" to spare at either end. The fact that I now have access to the rear of the storage sidings is an added bonus.     

    IMG_4102.jpeg.19f05ec2f432d835af93b49bcb32e07b.jpeg

    IMG_4101.jpeg.b8d86d1e45d191d497f2ea52287025c1.jpeg

    • Like 18
  2. Well, it's been quite a while since I last posted anything on this topic. Work was progressing, somewhat more slowly than before, and then we decided to move home earlier this year. So, in the space of four days at the beginning of March, we sold our house near Atlanta and bought one near Athens (Georgia not Greece, before anyone asks). The move itself took place over three days in mid-April: right in the middle of the COVID-19 outbreak here.

     

    That meant the layout had to be dismantled (no small task), the stock packed up, and everything transported 50 miles to our new home, before being reassembled. That work is now almost complete, and test running is in progress. All being well, I will post some pictures of Teignbridge (and Upcombe) in the near future.

     

    David 

     

     

    • Like 9
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  3. The last section of the layout which required some scenic attention has now been completed (at least for the moment). That is the rising ground behind the up platform and in front of Station Road at Teignbridge. In an attempt to capture the typical appearance of a country GWR station, I have now 'planted' a row of 8" pine trees (from JTT Scenery Products). As these are some 30" from the front of the layout, they are less detailed than the Scots pines at Upcombe station. The first pair of photographs show the 'before' and 'after' appearance.

     

    IMG_4000.jpg.211aed3b938e51dc990f35e067ce90e1.jpg

     

    IMG_4027.jpg.da5492778c6a8e445ad3c2403ab82e8f.jpg

     

    In the next pair of photographs, the goods shed is not hidden behind the large oak tree. The goods crane came from Mike's Models, longer ago than I care to recall.

     

    IMG_4005.jpg.2d313bd55f83aed7d747d2b73a9e7263.jpg

     

    IMG_4030.jpg.305f60087ab032c793dd35c8109f1d66.jpg

     

    If the roofs of the buildings look different in the 'after' photographs, that is because I am in the process of weathering them. Here is a final 'after' photograph looking from the other direction. I posted the corresponding 'before' photograph last week.

     

    IMG_4028.jpg.6f9d1f819607ecf10376667169fbf6b5.jpg

     

    Once again, thanks for looking and for your encouragement.

     

    David

     

     

     

     

    • Like 17
  4. Another part of the layout that has received some attention in recent months is the field and buildings at eastern end of the Teignbridge scene, here visible on the right in the distance.

     

    IMG_4007.jpg.c9edb6f87654bbb4491248208974faca.jpg

     

    In addition, there is now a gate leading into the goods yard, and a weigh bridge near the entrance. The vans in the foreground are all Bachmann models that have been detailed with screw-link or instanter couplings (Smiths). The two BR-design vans have also been fitted with tie bars (Cambrian Models). All have been weathered by GC Weathering, back in the UK (usual disclaimer).

     

    The next photograph shows a closer view of the cottages and Royal Oak inn, looking along the road across the railway over bridge to the bus stop opposite the entrance to Station Road. The inn was constructed to my own freelance design using Wills and Ratio materials, while the cottages were made from a Wills Craftsman kit, but substituting lime washed stone sheet for the walls.  

     

    IMG_4002.jpg.4cf2255e2d08208d0bade6dfdfe76977.jpg

     

    The Royal Oak has acquired a substantial covering of ivy (MiniNatur, 1:160 scale), and four trees from MBR Models have appeared in the field. Note the stile in the hedge opposite the Royal Oak (Peco) and the worn down grass on the path leading from it. Blocking the entrance to the field is an MG TC whose owner might have been glimpsed in earlier photographs watching the trains from the parapet of the over bridge.

     

    IMG_4014.jpg.9a09b024b46e8eba0fee566ccd0d63b0.jpg

     

    IMG_3862.jpg.8cc2b9828e8ba2bdae45e74f5d5ef0e6.jpg

     

    Thanks for looking and for your encouragement.

     

    David

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 12
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  5. It's been almost 18 months since I last posted something on this topic. In the meantime, I've been continuing to work on the layout, adding more detail and re-working some of the scenics that I didn't think were quite right. One of the aspects that I thought needed attention was the viaduct and its surroundings. The original back scene included some 'modern' farm buildings that I thought were a bit anachronistic, so I've added some more woodland in front of them. One of the other things that I thought would improve the viaduct was the addition of some trees. I searched for a long time for a suitable commercial product until I came across a supplier called MBR Models, based in Poland (usual disclaimer). The hedges have also seen some additional attention: the rubberized horse hair foundation has been covered with Woodland Scenics poly fiber and then with SuperLeaf from Scenic Express.

     

    IMG_3854.jpg.8f67a33d19eb0384f68958353f0ff6e3.jpg

     

    IMG_3852.jpg.a512a2108458d3ee5367a4e08eb9cda9.jpg

     

    IMG_3855.jpg.38539f52f6b3dc705ebdeb0e727810c9.jpg

     

     

     

    Thanks for looking. I will post more photographs of other developments in the near future.

     

    David  

    • Like 15
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
    • Round of applause 1
  6.  

    Has anyone got any recommendations for the best settings for CV2/3/4/5/6? At the moment, I have these set at 0, 1, 1, 180 and 60. Although the loco is very smooth running, it doesn't get to much more than slow crawl until speed step 30.   

     

    To follow up on my earlier posting, I have now reset CV2 through CV6 to the default settings (1, 2, 1, 1, 1) and performance of my 14XX at low speeds is somewhat improved. There is no doubt in my mind that the Zimo MX622N decoder is one of the best choices (if not the best) for this model, although it’s important to adjust CV9 to 51 and CV56 to 133 as recommended by the manufacturer  

     

    I suspect that this may well have been the first time that many of us who use DCC and model in 4mm scale have encountered a coreless motor, although these are common in 2 mm scale locomotives. It’s been an interesting experience, comparing chips from different manufacturers, but I’ve now got an attractive model that performs as well as any of my other RTR locos.

     

    • Like 1
  7.  

    If I changed anything else at all it will just have been standard stuff that has no particular bearing on smoothness of running (CV2/5/6 and maybe 57) as well as the loco Address.

     

     

    I have fitted a Zimo MX622N to my 14XX and adjusted CV9 to 51 and CV56 to 133 as recommended. Compared with the TCS EUN651 decoder that I had tried out earlier (with back EMF turned off), the improvement in performance was incredible.

     

    Has anyone got any recommendations for the best settings for CV2/3/4/5/6? At the moment, I have these set at 0, 1, 1, 180 and 60. Although the loco is very smooth running, it doesn't get to much more than slow crawl until speed step 30.   

     

    David

  8. Like others, I have just discovered this thread and have read it through from the beginning: what spectacular modeling! Your rendition of the English countryside is one of the most convincing I have seen. The craftsmanship involved in creating your trees and weathered buildings is of the highest standard.. Thanks for sharing this great layout, and please keep the pictures coming.

     

    David

    • Agree 1
  9. This is wonderful, the open spaciousness is so very country railway station in its atmosphere.

    Am I right in thinking the main Teignbridge station scene is 3 feet deep?

     

    I think I quoted the figure of 3 feet in a recent post, but when I rechecked this morning I realized it's actually 3 feet 8 inches in depth!

     

    David

  10. The next few pics show Broome Hall easing in to its scheduled stop at Stoke C. with its 4-coach local set (van 3rd; compo; 3rd; van 3rd).

     

    attachicon.gifTale of two halls 015-min.JPG

    attachicon.gifTale of two halls 016-min.JPG

     

    Those who've followed this thread recently may recall how the camera had exposed my skimping on detail that's out of sight at normal viewing angles.  It hadn't occurred to me when building the layout that I'd be able to get my camera into places where my head or eye wouldn't go.  I spent a couple of days or so last month putting this right.  What fun - standing on a chair bent double as if I was standing on my head at the back of the baseboard, painting the platform side of the fencing and adding advertising posters, applying lettering to the back of the running-in boards, and above all adding and painting the missing brickwork on the rear side platform faces and filling the cess between platform and track.  Glad it's over, with no damage (except a bit of acid indigestion from being bent double for so long!).  Not perfect, but it'll do, and allows some good shots.

     

    attachicon.gifTale of two halls 017-min-min.JPG

     

    Another thing I've been grappling with over recent weeks - without success so far - is trying to assemble Exactoscale GWR screw couplings and persuade them to adopt that characteristic GW arrangement whereby they're hung up to a hook beneath left buffer.  I'll come back to this in due course and have another go, but I'd spent so long at it that it was time to move on and get other things done.

     

    (I note that the Hattons/DJM 48xx is said to have just such a coupling set-up included.  I've emailed both Hattons and Dave Jones suggesting that this be made available as a spare.  Otherwise, in the short term the only way I can see towards getting what I want is to buy ten 48xx models, keep the couplings, and throw the locos away.  Might be a tad expensive.)

     

    attachicon.gifTale of two halls 018-min.JPG

    attachicon.gifTale of two halls 019-min.JPG

    attachicon.gifTale of two halls 020-min.JPG

     

    I quite like this last shot, which I think shows Bachmann's nice finish to advantage.

     

    John C.

     

     

    The first three pictures are some of the best I have seen on RMWeb. I can visualize myself on that station watching and listening to that train arriving. Brings back all sorts of wonderful memories.

     

    David 

  11.  I think it's time I posted a few photographs of some recent main line steam in action on the layout. To get going again, here is Castle Class no. 5053 Earl Cairns on a down express headed for Plymouth.

    IMG_3498.jpg.40769d6da1d6e7466c67e63ff0938631.jpg

    IMG_3503.jpg.86257550f757032c756e5d3cff749430.jpg

    IMG_3501.jpg.63c0d3c2356af75091e370e1e0dc43b2.jpg

    IMG_3496.jpg.cdaaa89d610f9c13960d63f1a149ac44.jpg

     

     

    In real life, no. 5053 was allocated to 83A (Newton Abbot) from December 1954 until November 1959 when it moved to 83D (Laira). It moved for the last time to 88A (Cardiff Canton) in September 1961, and was withdrawn in July 1962. It never received a double chimney, and spent long periods in the 1950s with a Hawksworth tender. There is a superb photograph of no. 5053 climbing westbound on Dainton in 1960 on the front cover of Peter Gray's 'Steam in Devon' colour album. 

     

    David

    • Like 15
    • Round of applause 1
  12. As anyone who has attempted to do this will be aware, merging foreground buildings with a back scene and achieving a reasonable perspective is challenging. I'd be interested in hearing folks' comments on my efforts so far. The location is the corner at the end of the branch line terminus (Upcombe). Neither version is perfect, but which one looks better? 

     

    This one:

     

     

     

    Or this one:

     

     

     

    BTW I'm aware that the car in the background is well out of period for the model!

     

    David

     

    • Like 10
×
×
  • Create New...