Jump to content
 

Stentor

Members
  • Posts

    210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

824 profile views

Stentor's Achievements

309

Reputation

  1. I noticed in the list there is Hornby R1057 Princess Royal listed but no detail of the affected area. I have one and the issue, in my example, is chassis expansion around the gear tunnel and the rear driving wheel causing gear locking up. I also have an addition Heljan 4611 OO gauge Class 47 diesel 47826 "Springburn" in Intercity Swift livery - general chassis expansion causing bowing of the body and eventually cracked cab fronts. Thank you for your work on this list, it is an important and useful resource. //Simon
  2. The markings on the Fruit D look like paint, not transfers. There is no carrier film of any kind, and if they were pressfix the positioning of them on both sides is absolutely identical over raised parts of the body, not easy to do. //Simon
  3. I recently bought a job lot of Hornby Dublo wagons, and I am very pleased with my purchase. There are two of them which look odd to me and I cannot find any references to them through my searching efforts on Google. Can anybody shed any light on them please. The first is marked as DM975161 Unit Packing Van Willesden. The body is what I would know as the Hornby 4 wheel coach body. The paint finish is to factory standard and the transfers are consistent on both sides but they appear to have a carrier film on them rather than being tampo printed. I cannot find the Hornby 4 wheel coach in red. The chassis is a HD chassis from a brake van but unlike any of my other HD wagons there are no lock stops to prevent the body from turning on the chassis, the chassis is slightly long and the body is slightly proud of the chassis at one end. All of which makes me think that this is a re chassis job rather than an original. Am I right ? The second is the familiar HD Fruit D wagon but with LMS markings, in addition to its GWR running number. The LMS markings look to be tampo printed and are consistent with the other markings the wagon and both sides are consistent. The chassis is the standard chassis. I can find plenty of images of the Fruit D but none with these markings so is this an original wagon or a bit of home brew ? As I said I'm very happy with these wagons but their markings puzzle me so if anyone can shed any light on their provenance I would love to know. Thanks //Simon
  4. Thanks to everybody for their quick and informative responses. In answer to a couple of questions I couldn’t see whether it had any kind of running gear or a number as we were short of time, next time I’m that way I’ll have a look. Sad to see it in its current state of decay given that it was up and running a short time ago but maybe that’s just me thinking that 2004 was sometime last week. //simon
  5. My Missus spotted this as we were walking by last Sunday in a front garden in Merton, Surrey. It has a Parry People Mover logo on it but it doesn’t look like a class 139. Did they have other vehicles and is this one of them or is the sticker a red herring? What variety of stock is this ? A quick search on Google could only flush out the same question on Flickr. Any insight much appreciated. Thanks //simon
  6. My thoughts and sympathies are with the staff, it’s their lives and plans that are thrown into the air by this news. We don’t need model railways to live, no, really we don’t, so this was a business based on selling us a little bit of pleasure and that’s why it feels a sad day when such a venture folds.
  7. In 1956 British Railways introduced an all-over darker maroon for passenger coaching stock which resembled the pre-nationalisation LMS livery. Similarly from 1956 on the Southern Region locomotive-hauled stock was generally painted 'coaching stock' green and on the Western Region some express passenger coaches were painted in traditional GWR-style chocolate and cream. So why didn’t the former LNER join in and paint some of their stock in a version of teak, silver or garter blue ? Apologies if I’m going over well trodden ground but I was thinking about it and realised that I’d not seen any photos or references to it. //Simon
  8. He had a sprig of heather next the badge, which and the shape of the regimental crest makes me think that it’s The Black Watch. //Simon
  9. Pure musing this but if it's in the wrong place please move it wonderful Admin team. Lying awake at 4 a.m. the other night trying to get to sleep I started thing about what names the Deltics would be named if they were recreated in a parallel universe in 2023. For the regiments it might be what those original regiments are now called. Looking at the last big name wins of the racehorses it would be perhaps the name of the horse that won the equivalent big race the number of years it was before the original horse names were allocated in 1961/2. So Meld won the St. Ledger in 1955, six years before she was named in 1961 so her name in 2023 would be the St. Leger winner in 2017. So here are my suggestions for what they could be in 2023: 55001 Eldar Eldarov 55002 and 55017 The Rifles 55003 Capri 55004 and 55013 The Scottish, Welsh & Irish Divisions 55005 The Royal Yorkshire Regiment 55006 The Scottish and North Irish Yeomanry 55007 Golden Horn 55008 and 55014 The Royal Yorkshire Regiment 55009 Fame & Glory 55010 and 55021 The Royal Regiment of Scotland 55011 The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers 55012 Anthony Van Dyck 55015 Kingston Hill 55016 92nd Regiment of Foot 55018 Sottsass 55019 The Highland Light Infantry 55020 Workforce 55022 Royal Scots Dragoon Guards So what does this tell us? As we all sadly know the army has been chopped up well and truly in the last 60 or so years with many famous names now just proud memories. As for the horses I can now understand why you don’t see many modern locomotives named after racehorses as apart from Capri, I loved my 2 litre S, they are not an especially inspiring bunch of names unless of course you had a big win on one of them. I certainly cannot see anybody naming a loco Golden Horn these days. Well that's my guess, I'll go back to sleep now.
  10. It’s actually an old public relations trick to leak something in a small way to blunt the story. Large company, for example, will tell the local paper that they are about to close a factory in their town, local paper publishes it, national news picks it up after a few days, large companies says “it’s not news, it’s been in the papers for days”. Shameless behaviour but that’s the world we live in. //Simon
  11. Can anybody tell me where I can source a chimney for a rebuilt West Country in OO please? I’ve sourced a body but it came without a chimney and when I’ve searched the usual suspects on t’web I can’t find anything, even the wonderful Albert Goodall draws a blank. Any help much appreciated, thanks. //Simon
  12. Hibelroad, yes I’m thinking that too, it would be right for a 1930s to 70s electrified railway control room. Maybe from a line that has been subsequently de-electrified like the Bury line, the Manchester, South Junction and Altrincham Railway, Tyneside or even Woodhead. //Simon
  13. Thanks Mike & Nearholmer, Traffolyte is a new material to me and I see that it was developed by Metropolitan-Vickers in 1927 at their factory at Trafford Park. So perhaps Metrovic might be the closest my mystery item gets to railways. I’ll keep my eye out for a large switch too. //Simon
  14. I recently bought this item from eBay. lt was sold as part of the estate of a railway enthusiast and modeller by a friend who, by her own admission, knows nothing about railways. It intrigued me and I’m guessing that it is transport related. Its a small plaque made of plastic or Bakelite on a wooden base with a hollowed out oval at the back, about 6” by 3”. I’ve tried Googling it but put in J,M and railway and you just get loads of stuff about JMRI. So can anybody please tell me what a J.M. Panel does and where would this plaque have been put up? Any help much appreciated, thank you, Simon
×
×
  • Create New...