Jump to content
 

pbkloss

Members
  • Posts

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by pbkloss

  1. When I get around to it my S&D unrebuilt will be 34043. Fated to be one of the first to be withdrawn in 1963, Bournemouth shed seemed to send it up the S&D when ever it could.  Something to do with a modification done in the early 50s that impaired its steaming (!). It got the first cut down tender at the same time. I think it even features in the opening sequence of the Titfield Thunderbolt (!). I've been trying to find out when it got AWS fitted, and struck gold when the front cover of the recently published book of S&D photos by Derek Cross it appears in soot livery (in contrast to the coaches behind). I won't be able to bring myself to weather it like that. (the photo shows it AWS fitted and is dated in the summer of 1961). I have something of a strange affection for this unfortunate loco ....

     

    (So to make a point - if you are trying to model around a particular date there are four main changes to take into account: rebuilding (big change), for those left unrebuilt the tender type and when it got one with sides cut down, livery change from lion & wheel to totem with lining changes to cab side and tender, and finally AWS fitting, all happening at different times)

     

    Postscript: I thought of two the things that are visually obvious: 1. The cab windows that were small and 'flat' on the original cabs, but they were changed very early on to the 'sloped' or angled variety 2. In a top view of the unrebuilds, originally the boiler had a cluster of three safety valves forward of the dome. Later, during the rebuilding period they were changed for two safety valves rear of the dome. There is a great top view of 34043 in Ivo Peter's 'The Somerset and Dorset in the 1950s - Volume 2 1955-59' photo 29 taken in July 1955 where the triple safety valve cluster really stands out, as well as the cut down tender, small lion & wheel centred on the tender side and the number on the same level - lower than the  unrebuilts with high tender sides. Unfortunately the lining can't be seen!

     

    PS my rebuilt will be 34028 Eddystone, having seen it and photographed it so many times on the Swanange Railway ...

    • Thanks 1
  2. One massive advantage of the new plan, without the facing and trailing crossovers crossing each other as in the old compact layout of the station throat, is that from an electrical point of view the wiring is much simpler.  In the old, both crossovers could not be simultaneously reversed as it would cause a short at the diamond crossing, in effect I needed interlocking for electrical as well as operational reasons.  Now, it will be just for operational / signalling reasons, much easier to wire. Avoiding DCC as yet, I plan to have the track feeds at the destination end, i.e. arriving trains will be fed by an 'arrivals' controller that can be switched to each platform end track, and departing trains from a controller at the fiddle yard end, I will still need to ensure by some means that the two controllers don't get inadvertently  connected!

  3. Sorry Jack I've only just seen this, and that by accident! The mods done are:

     

    Bogies compensated with MJT frames, Airfix / Dapol frames stuck on, wheels 18.83 3'6" disk

    Door handles and grab handles carved off and replaced by filed down dress making pins (for handles) and wire (grab rails)

    Under frame detail added - regulator box fattened, cross bracing added to frame struts, checked for right way round-ness as above

    numbers and class markings added, HMRS press-fix

    Flush glazed with SE fine cast parts

    Cards duckets windows carved out and PVA glazed 

    Buffers sprung

    Outer couplings of set replaced with Dingham, loop both ends (so I can run them either way, something I've not explained at all yet in my blog, like 'Why?')

     

    I'd like to do 'First' and no smoking labels if I can (!)

     

    Still need to fix roofs and do the internal coupling

     

    Regards, Peter

  4. Thank you Ravenser, I've checked and what I didn't say is that my intention is to only use Hachettes coupled to Bachmann Mk1s, which also appear to have the pockets at the wrong height - photo to show with my Hachette bare chassis coupled to the Bachmann BSK I've been working on ... (the Bachmann one droops a little, will be interesting to see how this works in a long rake)

     

    Hachette-Bachmann-couple.JPG.f6105716384dc7c5ac8ed7f417883699.JPG

  5. Miss Prism you are absolutely right about the buffers and I have  a set of sprung square shank buffers awaiting a swap with the rigid ones currently fitted.  And yes if I hadn't mentioned those awful curved buffer beams on the old Airfix chassis I certainly should have done! (I haven't checked that text file for a long, long time!!)

     

    I am so glad that gwr.org.uk rescued Tim Venton's notes, they are such a useful guide as there seems little else about B-Sets out there!!

     

    Now all I've got to do is pull them out of the box and finish them off (It was the bogies that I was going to do a bit more to, I wasn't happy with the mods I had done so far to those somewhat skinny (underweight might be more like it) Airfix mouldings and the replacement tie bars need to be higher up ....

×
×
  • Create New...