Jump to content
 

Tony Wright

Members+
  • Posts

    15,562
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Posts posted by Tony Wright

  1. 50 minutes ago, Captain Kernow said:

    Looking good, Tony.

    How will you replicate the firebox below the footplate? I found that difficult when I did my 75023, due to using a Portescap driving the middle axle. I would do it differently now.

     

    Good morning Captain,

     

    I, too, have arranged the drive on the middle axle, using a big Portescap.................

     

    75XXXnewchassis04.jpg.112e5cfae5dc7d2204d858ba0887f24f.jpg

     

    The lower firebox sections were made from brass sheet, cut to shape and soldered to the inside top of the frames.

     

    One other thing I noticed was that with the new chassis, there was no representation of the bottom of the boiler. As luck would have it, I'd just acquired some dud Hornby A3 bits, so I used a section of one of the boilers from those. Though flat at the bottom, the effect works.

     

    I've added plenty of lead ballast, too.

     

    75XXXnewchassis05.jpg.e9861e7842955b23a48cd0b8d84d7bb6.jpg

     

    I know the Portescap will be visible between the boiler and the frames, but there'll be plenty of 'stuff' in the way when the loco is complete to mitigate this. And, from most viewing angles it won't be seen (a poor excuse, perhaps).

     

    The thing is, this already works superbly!

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

     

     

    • Like 18
  2. 39 minutes ago, Flyingscotsmanfan said:

    Hello Tony,

    It was great to have both you and Mo over today. These pictures look amazing! You are welcome back to the Braintree and Halstead MRC anytime! 
    cheers

    Paul

    Thanks for your help, Paul.

     

    One can only take 'decent' pictures if the subject matter (I mean the whole layout, not my couple of locos) is of a high standard. Your club layout certainly is! It was a pleasure to photograph it. 

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  3. Fairburn 2-6-4Ts have been popular on Little Bytham...........

     

    42184Fairburn2-6-4T.jpg.68181fc1d4f3b52273b4c215609cabb4.jpg

     

    This is my own modified/detailed/renumbered Bachmann one, weathered by Geoff Haynes). 

     

    The prototype appeared on a train for Gorleston at Saxby one summer Saturday. 

     

    BachmannFairburn2-6-4T.jpg.536f951bceb75e108e8a70909ea6c274.jpg

     

    Another altered Bachmann one, brought a few years ago by some SR modelling friends. 

     

    BrianLeestock19DJHFairburn2-6-4T.jpg.dad84462639037d2865494eee31a9b3b.jpg

     

    I sold one from Brian Lee's collection, built from a DJH kit.

     

    Fairburn2-6-4T.jpg.f66c69e916798b88bfe4781cc36a14e8.jpg

     

    And another DJH example, from another collection.

     

    Stanier 2-6-4Ts don't seem to have been anything like as numerous.........

     

    HornbyStanier2-6-4TsR2730R2731.jpg.673a33f6b93ebb3a9a4d22df3d334f02.jpg

     

    Apart from the Peter Lawson one, this Hornby pair is all I've got in my photo library. 

    • Like 16
  4. Oh, I should point out from the post above that these three ex-GWR coaches are all that remain of Peter's carriages (which I've been selling - the ex-LMS and ex-LNER carriages went even before I needed to take their pictures; just an email or phone call!). 

     

    And, all that's left locomotive-wise is this pair..........

     

    DJHFairburn2-6-4T42063Portescap150_00.jpg.dd583f9e9f9234f5c3b705f5d0d2dae3.jpg

     

    A DJH Fairburn 2-6-4T (Portescap-powered), now just £130.00.

     

    Nu-CastStanier2-6-4T42597110_00.jpg.e1af3a9a73728a7a54d9a7de9f145dd2.jpg

     

    And a Nu-Cast Stanier 2-6-4T, now just £90.00.

     

    Anyone interested, please PM me. 

     

     

    • Like 9
  5. 5 hours ago, Barry Ten said:

    These earlier Hornby Collett coaches are a good basis for budget modelling. They can be picked up cheaply - get the ones with GWR bogies, not the 1970s ones with Mk1 bogies - and they are not bad representations of bow-end stock. To improve them, the moulded ends are blended in to the sides with filler, then the whole lot repainted and relined. I added SEF flushglaze, separate roof vents, MJT corridor connections and moved some of the chassis details around on the brake. 

     

    IMG_20240422_143635090.jpg.664580599ace559e4bca717affafd918.jpg

     

    The restaurant car can also be made into a good model in GWR condition, but needs more work for BR condition.

     

     

    Good evening Al,

     

    Seen before a few weeks ago, but maybe forgotten by now............

     WRcoach0150_00.jpg.f7f283bb487658765c7c7720023c4e7a.jpg

     

    Is this the same diagram as one of yours? 

     

    Built by Peter Lawson from a BSL kit, I'd originally asked £50.00, but now I'm asking £40.00.

     

    WRcoach0250_00.jpg.0617bfc954a5e299d27ffc74d7b3ce1b.jpg

     

    Another ex-GWR carriage from a BSL kit, also now £40.00.

     

    WRautocoach(modifiedRTR)40_00.jpg.bc36cc6232b96ac7f6f9ad5a9fb83570.jpg

     

    And a much-detailed/modified/weathered RTR autocoach, now £30.00.

     

    Anyone interested, please PM me.

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

     

    • Like 8
  6. Despite my getting that original Mainline 75XXX chassis to 'work' again, the racket from it has proved too much!

     

    75XXXnewchassis01.jpg.4207be3bf87ad72ddbdc895d0f988247.jpg

     

    So, I've decided to put a set of Comet frames underneath it.

     

    It looks as if they're designed to fit exactly underneath the body. 

     

    A Rolls Royce chassis underneath a (very) second-hand Ford 'Pop' body? Perhaps, but that body is very good, especially considering its age. 

     

    Can it be justified on Little Bytham? Very unlikely, though some 75XXXs were repaired at Doncaster. That being the case, if running-in, it would probably be clean.

     

    Rule 1? Especially as I've got multiples of all the classes that would have been seen. Maybe one didn't turn left at Helpston!  

    • Like 14
    • Round of applause 4
  7. 34 minutes ago, Harry Lund said:

    Tony.   Quick diversion.   I'm putting together my 'Elizabethan'.   The CWG which you kindly lent me lists BG, FK, RF, SO, etc.   Can you shed light on the Diagram no of the RF?  As ever, Giles    

    Good afternoon Giles,

     

    Probably Dia. 354 (page 103 in LNER Carriages by Michael Harris, T&L 1994), built originally for service in the post-War 'Flying Scotsman'.

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

  8. Thanks for all the comments on my 'budget modelling'; the discussions about wheels, bearings and axles have been enlightening. 

     

    As far as the Tri-ang Jinty goes, that really is as far as it goes. From an initial cost of four quid, by adding vacuum standpipes, ejector gear, buffers, lamps and a crew, plus the cost of paint and transfers, I've probably taken it over a tenner! And, that's the point in a way. By buying effectively 'duds', spending a little bit of time and resources, then a 'useful' model can be the result; at a very low cost overall. Yes, the Tri-ang wheels are gross, but they'll run on current set-track and Peco Code 100, which many modellers use. 

     

    I'm taking it no further; it's satisfied the brief. 

    • Like 5
    • Agree 2
  9. Speaking of the P2s, especially the new-build 2007..................... 

     

    Having shot and had edited a video of Hornby's splendid 'smoking' model of PRINCE OF WALES, does anyone have a photograph of the real 2007 under construction, please? One which can be used in the video (with due credit), because trying to get copyright permission for a graphic from the A1 Trust's website is turning out to be beyond 'publication' dates. 

     

    If anyone has a shot we could use, please PM me.

     

    Thanks in anticipation. 

  10. 10 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    Handsome is as handsome does, they say, and I never heard that these engines couldn't 'do'!

     

    And I do like that 12-wheeler, while lamenting that it's not in its original Great Northern splendour.

     

    The M&GN wagon is a curiosity. In fact pretty well all M&GN wagons are. 

    Good morning Stephen,

     

    'Handsome is as handsome does, they say, and I never heard that these engines couldn't 'do'!'

     

    Despite recent claims to the contrary, the A2/2s 'couldn't do' what they 'could do' as P2s (I'd sooner believe the first-hand writings of those now long-dead who worked the giants during the War than some more-recent work). 

     

    'Relegated' to English depots with little top-link work, they accrued the lowest mileage of any other LNER Pacific class, and (apart from three of the Raven A2s) 60505 was the first LNER-built Pacific to be withdrawn (at the 'tender age' of 16. Yes, I know SOLARIO went at much the same time with a cracked frame - at 36 years old! And, yes, some A1s only made 15, but they went as part of the mass cull in the '60s).

     

    I wonder if any group is contemplating a new-build A2/2? 

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

    • Like 5
  11. 3 hours ago, maico said:

    I watched Dunkirk at the South Bank IMAX. The director had been in and set the sound levels himself but for me it was way to loud. I had to leave before the end with my ears hurting. I think Christoper Nolan may have damaged hearing!

    I don't have any problems hearing actors mumbling but some of the sound effects were ridiculous. For example, the return fire from the Heinkel was slow thumping canon fire but at that stage of the war the Germans and British had rifle calibre machine guns.

    Good evening,

     

    I don't know about the aerial weaponry in the later Dunkirk, but what stopped any belief in its authenticity was seeing green BR Mk.1s as the survivors journeyed back to London.

     

    The original (John Mills) B&W Dunkirk from the late '50s was far superior.

     

    Why is it that when railways are shown in movies (or on TV), very little thought seems to have been given to make sure they're 'accurate for period', or even place. James Bond, on his journey back from Istanbul in From Russia With Love, appears to be travelling overnight in an all-green train hauled by a Royal Scot! Shadowlands got it right, and Loughborough 'could have been' like Oxford in the film, especially as the locos were weathered. 

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Agree 7
  12. 1 minute ago, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

    Possibly because one of our number was the son of a bookie? It was years later that I learned of the naming association with the Gees. What we most wanted of course was 'Streak!'

    Good afternoon,

     

    'Streak', of course. Shouted at the tops of our voices when one of those famous front ends made its presence felt at Gamston, Retford, Botany Bay, Bawtry, Doncaster, Selby, Riccall, Thirsk and Darlington - all the places where I saw an A4.

     

    I suppose the epithet was a 1950s/'60s schoolboys' phenomenon - Eric Fry once chided me for using it in his presence; 'Streamliner', he said, but he'd seen them in their pre-War heyday. 

     

    Though I rather doubt it, wouldn't it be nice to hear '91'!, '91'! shouted in a pre-voice-breaking squeal at Retford today? 

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

     

     

    • Like 6
  13. 5 minutes ago, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

    Alternatively: Racehorse!

    That's what the little gang in short trousers that I was part of would have been yelling. This so typical scene led to a love of Doncaster's finest, which produced the 'Grand Parade of Flamboyant Velocity, placing the ECML Miles Beevor all other lines'. Sigh.

     

    For Tony's benefit, I used that arrangement of pacific names  in an essay on the topic 'memories of childhood', and dear JAG Walker graded it A+.

    A splendid play on words, though I never heard of the A3s referred to as 'Racehorses' - only ever A3s in my short-trouser days.

     

    CENTENARY was one of the few not named after an equine sprinter. 

     

    Years ago, a commentator once suggested a current loco (say a Class 47) should be named RED RUM, in honour of the National's most-famous multi-winner. A nice thought, though it showed an 'ignorance' of the policy of the LNER/BR when it came to naming its speedsters. All the equine names commemorated winners on the flat, usually the Classics.

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

    • Like 5
    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...