Jump to content
 

sbduck

Members
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sbduck

  1. 1726166553_2020FebC.JPG.a4f8700d2569612f6490639b3bfc5607.JPG

     

    …meantime, young Robin was looking happy in his work.  Not!  We have got him scratchbuilding and he is putting up considerable resistance!  In fairness I had tasked him with creating a carcass out of 1mm plasticard.  A bit heavy going and I have now relented and let him use 0.5mm material. Better all round.  He is working on a simple shed building for the P-Way area of TJ – more to come

  2. 706630610_2019DecTJPWyardA.JPG.ea7e75dbbcf6709c5ea023bbfe158aa0.JPG

     

    The piece de resistance!  Thanks (huge thanks) to a visitor from last year’s Open Day and to some hard graft from members, we now know that this corner of Twickenham was actually the home of the P-Way department – presumably for the Windsor lines for some 80 years or so.  This is an overview of our interpretation of it – or at least the initial mock-up of our interpretation

     

    Also Howard’s patent board clamp is evident!  It ‘till be hidden in due course

     

    • Like 1
  3. post-20561-0-13807400-1535146898_thumb.jpg

     

     

    I know I’ve shown this astonishing creation before, but it’s so good it’s worth another punt!

     

    Seen in situ it makes more sense especially as the embankments are partially formed with track ballasted and painted.  Hopefully not long now, ‘til we get some track on top and trains can finally run from an imaginary Kingston to Twickenham as they still do to this day…

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  4. post-20561-0-64585400-1534884670.jpg

     

     

    Phew!  Well although it was warm, Twickenham Junction and the Fiddleyard behaved themselves.   In fact, they surpassed themselves!  We managed to run trains in both directions through Twickenham and through the fiddleyard.  Better still we were able to route trains through different lines on the fiddleyard. Well done Howard!  The only issue we had was back-to-back dimensions being rather mean especially on Hornby models – fellow OO finescale modellers please note!

     

    Back in 2016 when the rails expanded in the warmth, we couldn’t run a thing.  This turned out to be due to cross-wiring in the traction bus. Remember that DCC is AC so if two adjacent boards are cross-wired it won’t matter - unless the rail ends happen to make contact… Boy-oh-boy will it then matter!  And that’s what happened… suffice it to say we have rectified the wiring faults as the wiring needs to be right for reliable running and fault diagnosis

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. post-20561-0-80162400-1525382889.jpg

     

    And here’s the proof.  This is a train running on DCC trundling UP through the layout having just passed underneath the Kingston UP flyover line.  For those interested in EMUS, the unit is a 2-NOB (no bog in Southern EMU classification parlance) created by grafting a Tri-ang EMU cab front and roof onto a Bachmann EPB.  Quite convincing, especially when it’s trundling past.  Not immediately obvious what it is!  Come and see more at the end of July

     

    • Like 1
  6. post-20561-0-63506000-1525382675.jpg

     

    So we’ve been set a challenge!  Come and see Twickenham and the fiddleyard running at our Open Day on 21st  July.  We won’t have route control on the scenic section by then, but we will have the fiddleyard stocked with trains able to provide some variety through Twickenham.  So to give you an idea of the scale of the operation, here is the layout in its fullest current extent.  It’s big.  At our April workday, we set it all up to see whether it worked.  Once we’d cleaned the track it certainly did.  Very pleased :sungum: 

     

  7. Fantastic idea. I am looking forwards to seeing the truck.

    I'd better do a good job on it then lol.

     

    It's the most daunting part of the project, I'm hoping to kit bash it, but failing that I'll have to scratch build it. The most complicated scratch build I've done so far is weighbridge weighing equipment!

  8. I've decided to use OO9 track for the narrow gauge and the standard gauge will be represented by EM gauge track to really accentuate the difference of the different gauges.

     

    Here are a selection of pictures of a very early mockup of my proposed scene.

     

    post-20561-0-09362100-1522700730_thumb.jpg

     

    post-20561-0-66949700-1522700678_thumb.jpg

     

    post-20561-0-73509600-1522700602_thumb.jpg

     

    A standard gauge track meets a narrow gauge line 'head-on' which will represent the exchange siding. At the rear of the scene is another standard gauge line which will represent a continuation of the 'main line', implying a connection with the exchange siding off scene. I hope to also include a further stretch of narrow gauge track towards the front of the scene to suggest a larger narrow gauge network.

    • Like 1
  9. The book in question was this...

     

    post-20561-0-98383500-1522698663_thumb.jpg

     

    While I was browsing through the book, I found this page...

     

    post-20561-0-11426600-1522698738_thumb.jpg

     

    This was a revelation for me, I'd never heard of a transporter wagon before, here was a standard gauge wagon being transported by a narrow gauge wagon.

     

    I then discovered this video on Youtube 

     

     

    The scene I intend to recreate appears about 28 seconds into the video where a group of men push a Private owner wagon onto the transporter wagon in preparation for transportation.

     

    This scene just screams out 'Cakebox Challenge' to me.

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...