Jump to content
 

Jim15B

Members
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jim15B

  1. 18 hours ago, Nearholmer said:

    Are you 100% certain that it only appeared to be a waxwork?

     

    St Enodoc - my two visits to Mdme T’s were a few months ago, and during some sort of power/coal workers strike in about 1976 (there was a power cut during it), and a lot has changed in that time, in fact nothing hasn’t, and it has gone from very bad to even worse. 

    I've been in Tussauds a couple of times in the course of my work (not as a paying guest) and I'm amazed that anyone would fork out the small fortune required to get in. Bizarrely my sister-in-law and family love it and visit regularly throughout the year.  I doubt anything changes enough to warrant more than one visit in a lifetime.

    • Like 2
  2. 14 hours ago, Edwardian said:

     

    Well, as a railway in existence from the late 1850s, it might have done.  Nice idea.

     

    I would guess that, by the early 1880s it had start to apply its W.N.R initials. 

     

    What might such an illiteracy mark look like for the WNR?

    The silhouette of a dodo maybe? Or a pyramid?

    • Like 5
    • Agree 1
  3. On 29/03/2019 at 10:51, Joseph_Pestell said:

    Ignoring the Martians if I may, it has never occurred to me to ponder what was previously on the site of all those mansion flats. I must start to do some research on old-maps.co.uk. London may have been a much more attractive city.

    Many of the mansion flats were built on the sites of successive slum clearances in the early 1800s that systematically wiped out much of the early city that was still directly linked to the post Great Fire period. Thousands of people were moved out with the result that even more crowded slums were created on the fringes of the new developments. There was a building craze in the early 1800s akin to the railway mania later in the century, and many investors lost everything as projects floundered and developments stagnated. 

    • Informative/Useful 3
  4. 12 hours ago, Hroth said:

    I'd heard that Sally would be found around a corner between shots having a quick drag.  Gin on set would be...  problematic...

     

    Personally, I would have selected The Titfield Thunderbolt as a film-viewing option!

    I'll try them with that next time - I don't think they've seen it before (and I haven't for years). Girls at 8 and 13 are a surprisingly easy crowd to please.

    • Like 1
  5. The frontage is still there too. The railway features in the first book of Andrew Martin's Jim Stringer railway detective series (appropriately titled "The Necropolis Railway"), which I can highly recommend for those looking for some late Victorian/Edwardian atmosphere.

     

    Edited for inability to type.

    post-25126-0-82597900-1548086404.jpg

    • Like 2
  6. Three thoughts:

    1) If you want absolute accuracy, you need to compare drawings and quite possibly consider starting from scratch/specific kit;

    2) Will it satisfy you, if you make the changes you suggest?

    3) Decide on whether you want option 1 (must be as true to prototype) or option 2 (enough changes to make it different from the starting point and close enough to reasonably suggest the intended prototype) and stuff what anyone else thinks.

     

    As you are working in 00, you are obviously prepared to accept some deviation from strict dimensional accuracy, so I’ll throw the question back at you: do you think it will be close enough?

     

    If it works for you, to the level of accuracy/reasonableness/fidelity you wish to work to, stop worrying.

     

    PS Relocated dome, new cab sides, and new “steel” bufferbeams would make convincing changes.

    PPS http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/107281-peckett-locomotives-works-numbersclass/&do=findComment&comment=2170959 - remember that quoted cylinder size relates to the bore, not necessarily the dimensions over the cladding.

    Thank you for your thoughts. I think I'll have to find and compare some dimensions a bit more closely and see how much of a compromise it is. As you say, working in OO I'm happy to run with a few compromises and get the overall impression, but I'd still rather spend my money on something that's going to be accurate than a sows ear. I am slightly concerned that I'll find I'm not satisfied so I think I'll prioritise my money on the Andrew Barclays from Hattons (which will also require surgery or compromise but will at least be starting from the correct prototype) and do a bit more digging on the Peckett's measurements.

  7. If you are into kit building the CSPModes.com CSP41, Henry Court, looks like the right one!

    Thank you - the CSP one is a W4 as well but does have the correct shaped cab. Their Avonside is definitely on my list (I have the 7mm version) so if I'm doing a kit that one would brobably be first, along with a High Level Hawthorn Leslie. I will bear the Peckett in mind though.

  8. Whilst slowly putting together the workshop building I am also considering some motive power options. I have my eye on a couple of kits and hopefully will have a Hattons 16" Barclay soon, but I just wanted to canvas opinion as to whether the Hornby Peckett W4 would be a feasable conversion to the R type "Rothwell". Being from that town I would rather like to have the loco running. Other than the cylinder size I'm not sure how great the dimensional differences between the classes were. Would I get away with moving the dome and making some minor adjustments to the cab?

    post-25126-0-00418200-1548023842.jpg

  9. Best wishes Les. its something I guess we all live in trepidation of as years advance.

     

    I've seen a fair few pictures of "stuff" being transhipped at Barnstaple Town, but it looks to have come from the vans of SG passenger trains, onto the passenger platform.

     

    What the "stuff" is, I can't guess, but big wicker baskets, like laundry baskets, can be seen in several pictures. Apart from laundry, what might they be used for? Game in bulk is one possibility, but so many baskets ....... was their a massive traffic in rabbits or pheasants?

    Baskets were commonly used for textiles, so maybe gloves or lace in Barnstaple. The baskets in the attached image contain corsets from the factory in Desborough (still a going concern but not making many corsets now). The steam lorry is a Midland Railway owned Thorneycroft.

    post-25126-0-03913400-1547907390.jpg

    • Like 5
  10. Regarding accessing the online records held by the Manchester Museum of Science and Industry, have you tried looking at a web archive? I've just looked at the MOSI site from 1999. If you know where the links were you may still be able to access the database. I'm not sufficiently proficient with these things to say for certain that it would work but it might be worth a try. I'm sure someone here will be able to give more knowledgable advice. I searched on a site called Wayback Machine - web.archive.org.

     

    https://web.archive.org/web/20000520040118/http://www.msim.org.uk:80/nonshocked/index.html

×
×
  • Create New...