chrisveitch

2323 is a splendid piece of work and the last few photos show modern 2mm at its best (in my opinion...). I thought the latest Magazine cover with the loco on Drws-y-nant was a work of art, not least because Ruabon-Barmouth is one of my favourite locations.

Many thanks @Nick Mitchell for providing us with inspiration, and hopefully a bit of aspiration!

An absorbing account of progress as usual, Gerry - a shame that I never got to see Foxcote on the exhibition circuit. Wells is a bit of a trek for me but good to see that Mick made the trip to represent the region. I'll have to wait until you bring Tucking Mill suitably far North...

It was good to see your 2mm empire getting a mention in the new Pictorial Atlas of the S&D. The S&D isn't my usual tipple as it's one part of the UK I've never visited, but I have to say that I bought this magnificent new book on the back of my interest in the route being kindled by your modelling work. It's an expensive and weighty tome but I've not been disappointed. Like the Forest of Dean, I find the "rural industrial" scene there much more interesting and appealing than the sometimes bleak industrial panoramas which were created up here in the North East.

12 hours ago, nick_bastable said:

Fibber unless your a Newcastle supporter

Not exclusively. Slightly further south here in Sunderland, I noticed my mum’s neighbour adjusting his outside Christmas tree lights dressed in a tee shirt and pyjama bottoms yesterday. My car was registering -4C at the time. 

And apologies for encouraging the thread drift, Jerry. I'll confess that I'm mesmerised by the productivity of yourself, Dr Nick, Kevin, etc. (well, most other members to be honest) in comparison to my sloth-like lack of it. Perhaps less time on the forum and more time at the (now uncomfortably cold) bench would help. I no longer even have the excuse of full-time employment to hold me back so really need to get my finger out.

Having decided to throw in the towel with my own home 3D printing efforts, can anyone advise me on the best printing services to use for one-off items for our type of application (i.e. usually very small items those requiring and smooth surfaces and fine detail)?

I did try Shapeways some years ago but the results were mediocre at best and could hardly be described as perfectly smooth, and I believe their pricing structure has now changed to make them pretty uncompetitive. I'm assuming that UK-based companies are the best to go for given the difficulty of getting anything in and out of Europe nowadays, but I might be wrong. 

Thanks in advance,

Chris

On 22/09/2022 at 11:51, chrisveitch said:

 

I had some of my tooling with them and have since been in touch with the liquidators since I was not (along with many other customers, apparently) informed of the closure by PEC Ltd and only came across the news a couple of days ago. The process is being handled by Matthew Hill from the Birmingham office of PKF Smith Cooper who can be contacted on 0121 236 6789. I spoke to Matthew today and he suggested that I should pass on his details to anyone who has tooling with them and wishes to arrange to retrieve it. What remains in the company's premises apparently seems to be well marked and documented and it didn't take Matthew long to find my tooling amongst the remaining material. The current date for final clearance of the premises and disposal of what remains seems to be the beginning of November. 

Update - I retrieved my tooling yesterday. The liquidator is attempting to write to anyone who still has tooling with them, but they think there are about 350 customers to inform and obviously they've no guarantee that contact addresses etc. are up to date. The last date for retrieval of anything from the factory will probably be 1st November, after which the contents will be disposed of and the premises handed back to the landlord. 

On 29/08/2022 at 19:56, Nig H said:

I heard today that Photo Etch Consultants will cease trading at the end of this week. They sent out an email to that affect to their customers last week, though I didn't get a copy. I and other PEC users are waiting for more information from the company concerning acquiring our photo tools. Getting the tools may be of limited value as other etchers may not be able to use them anyway. My PEC tools will be too big for PPD sheets, so I would need to set up a new tool for a given item, and this could require significant re-arranging of parts on an etch to get everything into a narrower fret.

 

Nigel Hunt

I had some of my tooling with them and have since been in touch with the liquidators since I was not (along with many other customers, apparently) informed of the closure by PEC Ltd and only came across the news a couple of days ago. The process is being handled by Matthew Hill from the Birmingham office of PKF Smith Cooper who can be contacted on 0121 236 6789. I spoke to Matthew today and he suggested that I should pass on his details to anyone who has tooling with them and wishes to arrange to retrieve it. What remains in the company's premises apparently seems to be well marked and documented and it didn't take Matthew long to find my tooling amongst the remaining material. The current date for final clearance of the premises and disposal of what remains seems to be the beginning of November. 

Many thanks for your help guys, which has certainly given me a few ideas. @Jan W thanks for the epoxy information - we have a very good boat supplies place locally which I'm certain will have this or something equivalent. 

This is a very nice build, Bryn - even though I also initially thought it was in real time… :-(

The paintwork is beautifully crisp, I’m most impressed with the wasp stripes having had less success myself with water slide versions. 

This isn't really even a 2FS-specific question, but as it concerns a DJLC baseboard and I was most impressed by the entries at Derby it seems like a good place to ask. 

I'm designing a small layout around a DJLC baseboard and am now happy with the idea of the layout and logic behind it, and I'm at the stage of mocking up a 1/4 scale model to see how to proceed. I'd like a fully enclosed design (or whatever they're called) i.e. with a proscenium arch, side wings, overhung pelmet for fill-in lighting etc. as per Rice's "Cameo" book and many other designs. My doubts centre around the actual order of construction and the ability to access and work on the scenic bits "inside the box". 

The options seem to be:

1. Building it as a single structure and maybe only fitting the back sheet and backscene right at the end (or making them somehow removable, which seems tricky - especially at curved backscene corners). This has the benefit of strength and the disadvantage of sometimes difficult access;

2. Building the baseboard and casing separately and attempting to make one fit seamlessly (and removably) inside the other. The benefit is that the baseboard is fully accessible for track, scenic and building work. This was what I've tried previously and the casing ended up as a large flimsy box with a very big hole in the front - this was unsuccessful enough to motivate me to scrap the lot and I've not tried since;

3. Some sort of other compromise where sides and or ends are removable but will fit seamlessly enough to look OK.

How have people approached the problem?

I hope my explanation the question makes sense - any views or suggestions are welcome.

Regards,

Chris

11 hours ago, Sithlord75 said:

G'day all,

 

The next ZAG meeting  is this coming Saturday (13 August) from 1930GMT.  

Thanks Kevin - I'll hopefully be along. 

Is it my faulty imagination, or did there used to be a downloadable calendar entry for these? 

Regards,

Chris 

1 hour ago, Chris Higgs said:

 

It represents that a steel bufferbeam is a U shape (same as a solebar) with the open side of the U facing inwards. So indeed the outer face of the bufferbeam is flat.

 

And the end of the bufferbeams both sides of the beam are visible.

 

Chris

 

Thanks Chris - it's a few months since I worked on these and my confusion was exacerbated by forgetting what I'd done previously. I'll not embarrass myself by elaborating! 

Chris

I have a (possibly naive) question regarding interpretation of the instructions for the 2-382 Peco 10’ wheelbase wagon chassis replacement etch. I’m working my way through a batch and I’ve come unstuck on bufferbeams.

They state “Solder into place, ensuring they are accurately located over the buffer holes, and that the etched channel section faces inwards in the case of the steel bufferbeam.” (my emphasis). Am I right in thinking this means that the outer (visible) face is flat and the channel forms a void in the end of the bufferbeam? If so, what does this represent?

Thanks in advance,

Chris

Great work Peter, and I’m really looking forward to Easter next year. 
 

I’m always impressed with the original presentation of some 2FS layouts which use the scale to do what can’t be done effectively in anything larger, and this is surely one of the finest examples. The Derby show was a rich seam of inspiration of such things, although I now wish I’d paid more attention to that ingenuous fiddle yard system which I didn’t realise was associated with York…

14 hours ago, 2mmMark said:

Best ever railway memory was the trip by gravity in a Hudson bogie wagon from Ddualt to Minffordd early on a sunny August morning, in order to get the train home. 

There's (probably) nothing like the magic of an early morning gravity train - although this one is pictured before the "gravity" bit...obviously. 

Incidentally @2mmMark, British Oak was one of the layouts I was really looking forward to seeing at Derby and to be honest I didn't take that much of it in as we were too busy talking about this stuff!

1 hour ago, Sithlord75 said:

That was the 2016 Tour Chris!  Didn't get inside Boston Lodge this time (although visited the F&WHR) but got into the oldest continuously operating steam shed on the Talyllyn instead.

...hopefully I'll still be active on the FR for your 2028 trip then!

It was surprising how many people I talked to at Derby had an interest in the FR, I didn't expect that from a standard gauge modelling group. 

On 05/07/2022 at 13:14, Sithlord75 said:

I’ve had a bit of an enforced hiatus from the workbench - travelling to the DJ Expo in Derby and then having a week of catching up on everything I missed will do that! 

I'm assuming that the subtle change to your avatar means you managed to get in a trip to the Ffestiniog and a tour of Boston Lodge - hope you enjoyed it! 

On 18/06/2022 at 16:53, Jan W said:

Any pics of the DJLC layouts?

I have a few which I took before opening the Sunday morning to shamelessly steal ideas from give me some inspiration on presentation techniques, so unfortunately they're distance shots with little detail. I only did Gakunan, Callington Road and The Coal Hole (before Nick arrived to populate it with his works of art) but do wish I'd done them all. I think I was distracted by one of the Groves locos trundling across CF...

I'm repeating the comments of others, but I'd just like to add another thank you to the organisers and exhibitors for a great show. A very friendly, informative and inspiring couple of days, with the opportunity to see some stellar modelling in a really pleasant and informal atmosphere. There really were too many highlights to single out any one of them.

On 21/05/2022 at 23:20, Alex Duckworth said:

 

Go on - you know you want to.

 

Alex.

I do, and Mr Simpson taunting me with news of his latest project at the Jarrow show yesterday has only inflamed the situation…

On 20/05/2022 at 18:13, Alex Duckworth said:

I should add that although no.13 has a scratch built 2mmFS chassis with a 6mm motor no.10 is N gauge and runs on a tiny Portram chassis. I did build a chassis for it using a 6mm motor but was unable to get the chip or any weight into it whilst leaving the cab clear. The motor in the Portram is only about 3mm dia.

They're both an excellent representation @Alex Duckworth - I remember them well from trips to see the Harton system in my teens (which makes me feel pretty old...which I am). Your models and this week's cycling along disused mineral lines of the North East has got me thinking along the lines of 2FS coalfield industrials (again). I might have to dust off that Austerity body. 

2 hours ago, queensquare said:

The bottom, right corner of the picture has been expertly photoshopped in by Andy Y as this should be a 4' drop to the floor!

Shouldn’t that be a 620’ drop to the floor? 😉

On 04/10/2021 at 09:27, PhilJ W said:

An interesting vehicle what with the half cab. I wonder what the bar going from the scuttle to the front dumb irons is for, there appears to be a duplicate on the other side. A camera mount perhaps?

This image (I presume no one will be paying £375 for a copy) shows it with a detachable front camera platform so it looks like they were to support this. 

On 04/10/2021 at 19:10, PhilJ W said:

 

I would like to build a model of it if I could find a decent pic of the rear body.

There's a still of the rear of the car in The Goldfinger Files which is also featured at about 00:47 in the video at the head of this article. 

It's certainly an interesting subject for a model although the cab looks like it would take a bit of work - it doesn't look like it's part of the original and presumably was done by a local bodybuilder (or Pinewood themselves, who I assume would be capable of this sort of thing). I'm a bit late to this party, so apologies if this has been addressed in the couple of months since it was first featured. 

On 05/12/2021 at 13:49, queensquare said:

 

Since finishing the Kirtley Ive build another loco based on a David Eveleigh etch - the M class 0-6-0. Again its based on a picture of the prototype at Bath. Like the Kirtley, the etch is not without its issues but overall it went together pretty well and Im pleased with the finished model. She was mostly built at my little bench in the front room, mainly because its a pleasant environment and more sociable than sitting down my shed all evening!

 

 

It looks like an ideal setup which I'm much like to emulate. However I'm still trying to work out a convincing account of how I've ensured that the carpet would be protected from soldering iron burns. 

14 hours ago, 2mm Andy said:

The accuracy of the rods and the frames matching is purely down to the etch designer having drawn them correctly and the etch artwork not getting stretched in some weird way.

Indeed it is and you’re right, the jig only really aligns the frames in the correct planes and gets the bearings in the right place. My assumption is that the artwork does indeed provide the same spacing for the rod centres and bearing holes.

1 minute ago, Miss Prism said:

So the assembly jig (whose purpose was to match the rod centres with the axle centres) wasn't quite as good as it should have been?

 

No, I suspect it was 100% correct and that one of the bearings subsequently shifted in my ham-fisted attempt to resolder one of the PCB spacers back in when it came adrift.