Pteremy

I am happy with both of mine and look forward to buying more to reflect the different designs and liveries around in the late 1950s. It may not be perfect but for £135, and with the probability that you can model any prototype in the range 5390-7321 there is more going for it than against it. On slow running... despite what the Dapol instructions say my two both improved with some additional lubrication of the motion and running in. But in an effort to test slow running to its limits I think that I may have identified a fault with my DC controller (an elderly Gaugemaster). What I observed was that at walking pace i would get 8 smooth wheel revolutions then about 4 where it was more hesitant, as if there was a power drop off. I have tried the same with a Bachmann Hall and Prairie, and a Kernow Warship, and they all do the same sort of thing. Does anyone recognise this phenomenon??

Which period are you interested in? The steam pipes look to be a separate component so as such they should be removable. But they are not listed as a spare part, so it may require 'minor surgery'. Yes there would be small holes to fill. In addition because boilers could be swapped around by the late 20's early 30's some locos would have small patches covering the gaps where outside pipes had previously been. Depending on chosen prototype and period these might need to be modelled rather than just filling the holes. The other thing to watch is the height of the wash out plugs - if that sort of thing matters to you! Dapol are doing both high and low versions so hopefully both will appear in the various livery variations in due course.

7304 remained unlined green until withdrawal, and there is a good photo of it in ex works unlined green at Swindon in May 1961. So it is possible that 6372 was 'delined' at a similar time, to save money on the additional work of lining out. For variety I intend to duck the issue by having 6372 in 1956 Royal Train livery, as that must have endured for a few years. In addition, at that time it still had Churchward buffers. But in due course I think I may also model a dirty lined loco/unlined tender combination.

Yes. 6372 was one of the first moguls to be repainted in lined green, for the Royal Tour of West Country in May 1956. At that time it had the original style double lining at the top of the tender. (There is a good colour photo of it in that condition on page 130 of Maidment, taken in July 1956.) On p159 of Maidment 6372 is described as being in unlined green in the summer of 1961. I am sceptical that the loco would have been repainted in unlined green, but there are photos of it with an unlined tender in 1962-63 - the clue is the larger version of the late crest which would not have fitted between lining. (See for example the colour photo on p7 of Gray, Steam on West Country Steam Lines.) So possibly by then the loco had simply been paired with an unlined tender. (By the early 1960s it can be very difficult to make out the presence of lining on grubby moguls so I find the size of the crest is the best clue.)

Perhaps. But if you place them side by side the Bachmann version shows its age in terms of the thickness and size/presence of moulding detail. But on a positive note whereas Dapol has accurately modelled late moguls - so approx 63xx numbers - the Bachmann version has the characteristics of earlier batches in the series - thinner motion bracket, the earlier side splashers, and a tall safety valve cover. So it still has value if you are after the earlier versions.

Looks excellent. What did you make the weather sheet out of?

Considering the things that are not listed as 'spares' Dapol appear to be generating an impressive range of potential body shell combinations for variation amongst the (approx) 63xx Moguls, covering: high/low wash out plugs - outside steam pipes/no outside steam pipes - long/short safety valve covers. It will be interesting to see how many different variants they do produce.

Are all the 'grumpies' on here Hornby shareholders? The bodywork is a thing of beauty and execution. The mechanics need some bedding in, maybe some gentle 'fettling'. Hardly surprising for a small piece of machinery that is going to get a lot of scrutiny. There are compromises in the design - not surprising given that this is RTR, not high end finescale. We should be encouraging diversification and risk taking in the hobby - no one benefits from a monopoly.

The booklet you get with the model has a list of spares covering 4 pages - looks like you can get virtually the whole thing in bits!

I may be wrong but on my 6324 the upper slide bars look straight and you have to look quite hard to see a bend on the lower ones - I doubt that i would have noticed if it hadn't been pointed out.

As mine has now arrived I can confirm that it has two lamp irons. A set of lamp irons is listed amongst the spares so I think that the top one should be easily removed, leaving only a small hole to be filled and requiring a dab of paint.

As the owner of several I sincerely hope not! For all the possible issues about the accuracy of the bodywork and livery the one thing we should be guaranteed with any new version of a model that is 1 or 2 decades old is an improvement in 'performance'.

Some photos show 2, others just 1! Hopefully the new arrivals are correct.

A couple of enlargements from an undated late period photo (i.e. late crest + additional piping) of 18000 apparently at Swindon station. Looking at the right side of the cab/photo it would appear that the thick chrome orange band is immediately next to the roof grey/silver, without a gap between them, and has a thinner line below it. So similar in style to the side lining but not identical. This near front on view also clearly shows the additional piping attached to the boiler drain cock. I wonder if this late addition to 18000 might reflect some generic change in practice in the late 1950's about how water was to be drained?

Is the roof band clear in this photo? I ask because I have found another colour image in which it looks as if it might be the same style as the side band - that is, one thick stripe in the middle of two very thin ones?

By chance I have come across another good colour photo of 18000 out of service at Swindon dated 9/3/61 on page 46 of British Railways Western Region in Colour. ((John posted a grainier B/W version earlier in the thread). Alerted to existence of a lower body stripe you can just about make it out - but it is hardly discernible, unlike the roof and side body stripes. The reason for posting though is that the 'additional pipework' is clearer and looks very much like it is connected to the boiler drain cock.

Computer calibration issues aside I don't think there is any doubt (e.g. looking at the 'Huntriss photo' earlier in the thread) that the buffer beams are red - as per the 1956 repainting specification - and that the lining is some shade of orange. I am happy to defer to others on what precisely that was, but logically it would be something that Swindon had in stock for other (similar) uses.

I had hoped that the information here https://davidheyscollection.com/pages/david-heys-steam-diesel-photo-collection-23-br-western-region-3 might shed some further light. But unfortunately the reporting number '211' is missing from the lists during the relevant period.

On the pipework - also just for discussion - the 'ladder' period photographs, green early crest, do not have any pipework. So the pipework was not added during the period in 1956-57 during which 18000 was overhauled, repainted and then returned to traffic in early February 1957. In the RTCS archive there is a photograph of 18000 approaching Reading General with a Passenger train dated 27/8/58 with the pipework visible. Robertson has a photo (p125) dated 4/3/58 clearly showing a late crest but apparently no pipework. Discussing visits back to Swindon in 1958 Robertson (p126) refers to a fire in some of the control cables. This event is not dated, but 18000 was apparently noted at Swindon Works in April 1958. Could this be when and why the pipework appeared? If so it may be reasonable to conclude that the pipework was present for the final 18 months of 18000's active life. But prior to that it was in service between Feb 1957 and (?) April 1958 in green/early crest and then green/late crest, with no pipework.

Yes, that is much clearer - in black and white the lining and light refraction from the top of the bevel must blend together.

I think that I would be happy to 'stick' while we are ahead. Here is a crop from, I think, from an RTCS photo, similar to the 'propped ladder' photo referred to above. Here it looks like there might be some sort of colour band above the bevel. But the bevel itself is less distinct than in other photos. And the colour band is less intense than either the roof or side stripe. Which may be due to weathering. Or maybe it is some trick of the light, enhanced by cleaning - the top of the bevel does stand out even in black livery photos.

Yes. Sales of the large Prairie and the Manor depend on the Mogul being a success. I am sure that they will do all they can to make sure that it is a success.

Thanks Phil - yes I have seen that suggested before, although the Class 40 boxes are a different design. It is just that the Kernow D6xx versions look spot on for the WR style boxes, as bolted on to some of the early D63xx's, before they took the decision to rebuild the front ends.

On the transition from black to green there is contemporaneous evidence in the 'Locomotive Notes' on p143 of the 1957 Railway Magazine. Relating back to December 1956 it is noted that at Swindon '...18000 had been given an undercoat of green paint, which suggests that it is about to come back into service.' Which it did, in February 1957. The Swindon repainting memorandum of 25 October 1956, referred to by Robertson (p122) does not mention the lining at all so the colour used has to be the subject of an educated guess.

Out of interest are the head code boxes a separate attachment or a continuous mold? I ask because if they could be made available on their own they could used to modify the Dapol 63xx to the first head code box variants.