Jump to content
 

Departmental203

Members
  • Posts

    296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Profile Information

  • Location
    Edinburgh
  • Interests
    Would be broke if I tried to pursue them all!

Recent Profile Visitors

998 profile views

Departmental203's Achievements

506

Reputation

  1. Hi guys, thanks for the comments and I didn't know that the wagon works at Millerhill was still used for its original purpose, thought it was just used to stable locos between engineers duties. I have a few pics from a Colas driver on my laptop seeing some locos stabled there, including an 88 that was less than 3 years old at the time peeking at the weeds! I plan to replicate the stabling somewhat by shuffling locos on and off for added interest and give my growing fleet of locos something to do as well ;) And I wasn't aware of anyone having a crack at Oxwellmains, sure it would be quite an impressive beast once finished.....hope that gets underway Jules
  2. Hi Bill, sorry for the late reply (life stuff getting in the way somewhat) but I do like this concept for a layout that has restricted length and I think it's quite clever, which allows you to get scenery on the whole length, but has one caveat....you do need a fair bit of girth which, sadly my room as it stands, doesn't offer. I only have 2ft of depth at best even with the layout right up against the wall and I also plan to operate it from the front in my house and from the back whilst exhibiting to allow a decent bit of flexibility for different situations. This also creates a question mark with the fiddle yard design as I would ideally would like a cassette to allow stock to be swapped with ease but how do I allow for both front and back operation with this? All of these questions I hope to answer soon as the opportunity to get really stuck in this project arises soon with uni work dying down for the summer! Also ta for the pics, they were helpful to visualise the concept and it might be one I may pinch for a future layout (!) Jules
  3. Hi Bill, thanks for providing some insight. It's not an idea I've considered before, and with some clever design, it could work. What would be very helpful is if you had a diagram or a worked example of the concept so I could get a good idea of how this would work. What I'm imagining is one end of the layout will have the repair shed and the wall facing the operator would be removed so you could access the rolling stock from there? So you have three walls of the building visible but an access hole to swap rolling stock within the confines of the repair shed? From memory I don't really recall any layouts that don't have fiddleyards but I have seen sketches of some and I have to say, very clever! As I say, although I have a fairly clear idea of what the layout could look like based of Alcanman's design, I wish to keep my options open and explore different possibilities in the name of creativity! Thanks, Jules
  4. Hi Alcanman, this looks like the Tees Yard model I was talking about! This is the kind of thing I'm aiming for, not a "as much track as possible squeezed in the basebaord width" approach but with enough to play trains with, it seems to be a hard balance to get right given 6ft of scenic space. I recon I have 2ft for the fiddle yard which should be enough for my longest loco (Class 60) plus my longest wagon (JNA Falcon) so we can have some serious "super shunting" to happen! Hope you don't mind if I nick some of your elements from your Tees Yard layout 😉 as for example the real location at Millerhill is surrounded by trees and has a rough dirt road for DB staff vehicles and there's no way they would keep grass from growing absolutely everywhere! Thanks for posting this and the kind remarks, hope to provide some entertainment good sir Jules
  5. Hi all, I have made the decision to dismantle Torness Yard and replace it with something more manageable. I have explained the details of my reasons for doing so and the beginnings of the replacement layout in another forum so I'll put the link for that here to avoid repeating myself. Was this layout a waste of time? No actually, it taught me a lot of things, not just about the importance of having level baseboards (!) but the importance of composition and provision of space when it comes to building and designing layouts, trackwork and wiring. I plan to recover the trackwork and the ballast for the future layout and I have made a start on this. Paused for a moment to allow me to focus on uni work but will continue afterwards. With that, I'll close this forum but my workbench thread should still be alive and kicking as well as the new layout forum so, new beginnings, as they say! Thanks to everyone who has reacted and commented here and passing advice on in general. Jules
  6. Hi all, For those who are in the know, I've been working on a home based layout, Torness Yard for a couple of years now (7 if you really want to count 😬) which was going to feature a small terminating station for Scotrail DMUs and a small engineers yard to keep my engineering wagon needs satisfied! Regarding this, I made the decision last month to halt progress on this and dismantle it. The reasons for this decisions are a bit of a list but basically, I had too many frustrations with it which made me lose my mojo for it. A combination of tight trainset curves, short sidings which meant I could only run 4 wagon trains (at a stretch) and 2 car DMUs, point motor gremlins, lack of operational flexibility and the fact it took half of my room. The last straw came when I found that there was a big dip in one of the baseboards which meant that when I tried to use Kadee couplings, the wagons would pull on the couplings, meaning that no uncoupling took place due to unwanted tensioning! I figured to fix that, I would have to rip up the track on that baseboard anyway. Additionally, regarding my future as an undergrad engineering student, the next 3 years or so could go anywhere with potential of moving out from home thus I figured something small and portable would be best, which would also allow me to exhibit as well. Bit of a rant there but I'll stop there and move on to the interesting stuff! Anyway, I'm in a small group called the Scottish Modellers and two years ago, we started a "layout in a box" challenge where we would have to make complete, working layouts to fit in boxfiles made by the Really Useful Box Company. I talked to the member who did the baseboard cutting for this (he has a laser cutter) and he was happy to cut out a few basebaords for me so I could, become a late entrant to the challenge. However, to avoid the pressure of having to meet deadlines with other commitments, I'm not in the competition but I'll still be able to have baseboards done by someone other than me, which I'm relieved about! To be able to reuse the now extensive list of engineers stock I've got, right for the start, I settled on some sort of wagon repair depot as I realised I didn't have the space to represent an engineers yard or even part of one. This would also allow me to model wagons I've never done before, and at Model Rail Scotland, I already diversified with my wagon purchases! After a bit of research, I was attracted to the WRD at Tees Yard but someone on here did a nice version of it himself many moons ago so I wanted something a bit more unique to avoid duplication. I remembered that on the south west end of Millerhill has some sort of shed with sidings going through and next to it, which I realised was a wagon repair depot. Although it's no longer used for this purpose, I liked this concept and the basic trackplan for this quiet corner of a busy yard was ideal for what I was looking for, shunting interest without cramming lots of track on a small baseboard. Basically, my idea is crippled wagons would be shunted on the line beyond the first row of trees behind the blue building, stop at a kickback (out of shot to the right) and reverse into either the shed or one of the adjacent sidings for the wagon to get patched up and get rolling again! I don't have space for three sidings so I'll settle for one, which still should allow some interesting shunting movements to occur. Additionally, I'll shorten the trackwork so it can all fit in about 6ft of space. In other words, the trackplan is based on Millerhill with the compactness of Tees WRD. I've attached one of Tees for comparison (credits to the owner). Much more modellable than the expansiveness of the one at Millerhill! Although I plan to have the scenery based off the one at Millerhill, this could change as the layout design evolves. Although I have a good idea of what the track layout will be like, I decided to put it on a piece of paper to have it as a record. I have two slight variations in the track layout, although I'm leaning on the top one, the other one is included for completeness. Of course, there's still a lot of final details to sort out but I feel this one could work out well, provided I plan carefully and remain open minded. Dismantling of Torness Yard has been paused for a moment to allow for studies but with a two week Easter break around the corner, hopefully by late May/early June I'll be ready to start this new project. Hopefully, more updates to follow as I refine the design and make some major decisions (basebaord size, fiddle yard type being the main ones so far) and I'll likely be active with the workbench, which as stated, will have something other than engineers wagons for maximum entertainment! Thanks for reading and happy modelling all. Jules
  7. Yes, my apologies, turns out that they use the new models but have the old artwork! Not the first time that's happened to Hornby but infamously, there have been cases where the artwork was correct but the model was wrong 🤔 In that case, I'll probably try to look for old/cheap HAAs/MHAs as donors for my last conversions (but never say never as they say 😁) so will be a case of looking for unboxed examples hidden away at exhibitions! Jules
  8. The 60 I bought was a secondhand version which was missing the detail pack including the ploughs. Hope wasn't lost as I found that a chap that goes by the name Rusty Rails does a 3D printed version of these ploughs which look quite good so I'll be modifying those anyway! https://www.rustyrailsmodelling.com/shop For the MAA, I've seen two or three models of that and all of them to my knowledge used the early iteration of the Hornby MHA, which was basically too tall for the real thing. From my experience you can find them in exhibitions as I'm guessing Hornby produced a fair amount before realising they dropped a spanner in the works! Although, given you have a chassis already, the scratchbuilding route would probably be more viable as it's not too tricky as the body structure of those wagons isn't that different from normal MHAs. I hope to get the Class 67 + MHA pack that Hornby did a couple of years ago which curiously has the early version of the MHA. My plan is one becomes an ex MAA and then the other two will be two more scratchbuilds of the later bodied version for consistency's sake! Jules
  9. As some of you might have read in my workbench forum, I've been on a year long exile from here due to personal reasons, now that things have calmed down somewhat and a resurgence in mojo a few weeks ago, some more progress has been made on the layout as I got tired of it just collecting dust, not getting much attention..... The more I looked at the sidings in the "ballast yard", the more I loathed the ridiculously tight curves I employed to create as large of a gap between the sidings as possible and decided to take the fairly drastic action of ripping them up and relaying them! Additionally, with my switch to Kadees, I found that the delayed uncoupling would really struggle on such curves and took the opportunity to fit permanent magnets underneath the tracks. More on that later! As a quick reminder, this is what this end of the layout looked like before the "destructive" work commenced, with the eyesore curves there for everyone to view! To remove the ballast, water in a Fairy bottle did a surprisingly effective job of dissolving the glue and I could use a screwdriver to scrape it off, being careful not to damage the Sundella surface below. Give or take 2 or 3 days and this is what resulted! I did slightly damage the Sundella surface in a few spots so fresh wall paint was used to seal in the damage. I find that painting Sundella surfaces is an effective way to reduce damage and it might be able to keep moisture out which is detrimental for the compressed paper material. The track was easy to take up as it was simply nailed in place and it was cleaned up after removal to get rid of the glue deposits and stuck ballast. The aim was to have the sidings at as gentle of a curve as possible to appeal to the eye and allow for reliable delayed uncoupling, which I did using these rectangular neodymium magnets I got on eBay to keep things simple. I felt that using electromagnets would have complicated things a bit. To take the magnets, I cut a recess in the surface (really easy with Sundella) and made sure the magnets were far apart enough to ensure the Kadee couplings would open reliably in both directions using a piece of plastic square section. After I relaid the siding, I couldn't resist popping my 68 and some wagons on it to take a few shots! These views made me regret my clumsy 15 year old self's decision to have these very train set type curves on such a key part of the layout with bogies in full swing! Work has started on the second siding to the right of this one, which will be more difficult as I don't have much baseboard to work with! Thus, a "part 2" to this should follow, whether that comes out in 2 weeks or 2 months is at the mercy of uni, work and general life things! Thanks for reading, Jules
  10. Funny that you say that James, I seem to have the opposite problem as I model the 2015-2017 period and keep getting models in early privitisation liveries secondhand, EWS, Transrail and two tone Freightliner grey being the worst offenders! I tend to stick to secondhand anyhow to keep the costs down (student's budget) but getting fruitful bargains seems to become increasingly challenging....hopefully the wave of new models can encourage younger modellers who don't have as much money to throw away to get started without having to resort to Lima! And yes, I can confirm youth seems to have a bargaining power for getting stuff on the cheap....I'll have to take advantage before time inevitably runs out 😂 And if you ever encounter the Junction Box, definitely check them out as they seem to remain very level headed with their prices (such as £100 for a 37/5 or £28 for a Seacow) but thanks, will check out Ellis Clark given the opportunity 😉 Jules
  11. Thanks bud, so far, it's only the 56 and 68 that have been converted and I've managed to fit all of the pipes on those. Currently I have a Hornby 60 and Bachmann 66 waiting the conversion, as both have valences, they'll need some surgery to take the couplings but I hope to have the piping on them. The challenge will doubtless be my 37s due to the very restricted space beneath the bufferbeam. I have seen successful Kadee conversions for them with even the snowploughs retained which would be the ideal but perhaps that would restrict functionality over curves? As my fiddle yard has 2nd radius curves, it does stretch the couplings a fair bit..... This image was taken from an archived thread here somewhere but illustrates the effect I hope to go for. Can anybody shed some light on doing such a conversion and would it be able to take tight curves? The two late build Coalfish conversions have been quite enjoyable in my opinion as it's a fairly simple scratchbuild and both donor chassis came from fairly beat up HAA/CDA hopper wagons so it was nice to be able to breathe some life into some aging but still solid wagon donors! Yes, they're not as detailed/accurate as the Accurascale versions but knowing that they've been rescues done on the cheap gives me enough justification 😉 a future project would be one of the ex MAA versions as that would be something unique in the growing fleet of 2 axle spoil wagons...... Jules
  12. Hi Rich, if I'm going to be honest, I've parked the Class 156 project for the short to medium term, after realising how much of a faff it was getting the underframe rebuilt, putting on new bogies and rewiring the thing to take lights.....in the wake of uni and the various other things a twenty-something gets up to, it feels more and more I've bitten off more than I could chew! 🙃 However, I do plan to revisit it given more time and confidence as I feel it would be a shame to leave the partially converted model to rot, as despite the Realtrack one, the Lima/Hornby 156 is still a nice model ignoring the underframe 🤔 Over the past year that I've been away, a few things have happened, most notably I've managed to (finally) get airbrushes and a compressor, the latter being the Sparmax Arism Mini, which isn't the most powerful around but won't be a pain in the @rse to carry around! I haven't used them much aside from some basic practice so hopefully with the more clement months on the way, some of my long awaited repaint projects can happen....trying not to make too many promises here! Modelling wise, I've been progressing on two Coalfish, both on Hornby chassis with an early bodied variant (394116) just needing some weathering and another one of my scratchbulit later bodied ones getting through the painting stage with a hope to get it ready for weathering by the time MRS comes around next month. The maroon is almost complete and for those that don't know, Rainbow Railways now do enamel paint to the same formula as Railmatch (I believe they're made in the same factory) with a large jar like this for £4.10 which is good value for money for 2024 😁 only caveat is it's thin so either you have to build up 8+ coats if you're brushing or put a similar coloured basecoat of Humbrol or Revell. I'll do the latter from now as it's a faff sanding the paint after 4 coats and then having to put on 4 more to compensate! Otherwise, this paint has been really nice to work with and I've even avoided problems with stuck lids which was my real annoyance with Railmatch in the past. My "other" significant update is I decided to use Kadee auto couplings for my locos and outer rakes of rolling stock, as they allow the mounting of (nearly) full bufferbeam detail on my locos whilst being able to handle tight curves and bouncy trackwork (I now look in horror at my 14 year old self's woodwork and decision to use Sundella.....) Loco wise, these are the only two I've converted so far, using the #141 long underset couplings so they can clear the bufferbeams and for anyone looking to mount Kadees to their locos directly to their chassis, these are the couplings to go for. I have realised I'm going to have to get creative with my 47 and fleet of 37s, so if anyone has advice in fitting Kadees on them, I'm all ears! I kept it simple (and frugal) for my wagons by going for NEM mounted ones for them and I'll only convert my "outer" wagons in a rake, swapping them around at times to introduce some variety. These are the ones I've converted so far. The exception to that rule is my FNA nuclear flask wagons, given that the trains for them are short and for flexibility, I've put Kadees on both ends on my models, including these bad boys that came from Rainbow Railways in November 😁 I have two of these, from Revolution as they're a bit cheaper than the Accurascale versions and detail wise, there's not much between the two. The self centring coupling mechanisms had a bit too much slack for me (the centring springs are no thicker than a human hair) so they were taken out for possible reuse and some old Kadee #46 couplings I got cheaply from eBay took their place. They really do look the part behind my Dapol 68, kudos to Revolution and Rainbow Railways for these! I know that this isn't much to show after a year away but it was a break that I really benefitted from and sometimes, you need to know when to pause on something as burnout can be a real killer for motivation. I do hope to keep updating as projects continue on but sometimes, I need to remind myself that I'm a guy with a hobby with other things going on in life, as the old quote goes, it's a hobby, not a job! Happy modelling all! Jules
  13. Hi James, I have to say some truly amazing work with all of the locos and the fact you can seem get them all for under £100....I'll need to take a few leaves out of your book for that considering today's prices 😉 Yes, I do like the look of the Cavalex 56s and they're probably going to achieve as highly with their 60 but there's something about the Hornby versions of both that make them worth hanging onto imo.... Jules
  14. Thanks for that bud, it does mean a lot to me although in general, the past few years have been testing times for all of us so it's great we're seeing some common decency unlike other places online 🤢 Also, I did check what you've been up to over the past few months, that is some impressive work especially with the rail carrier wagons but the humble SAA is what impressed the most.....I did a Hornby OAA a while back and regulated its old underframe into the bin thinking it was completely unusable, not so fast! Jules
  15. So........it has been a little while! Last year has been a very wild one for me, long story short, I wasn't in the best place mentally for the first half of the year with the addition of a rather late autism diagnosis, so the modelling took a back seat when faced with these complications. Fortunately, with support from good friends and family, I've managed to climb out of the woods. The question is, does that mean a return to RMWeb? Yes and no, as although my modelling mojo has returned and my close friend has a real passion into model railways, last year was also a period of self discovery, realising that life isn't just about railways and model trains, but also finding your passions and building solid friendships among other things.......in short, I'll make a limited return to this platform, posting updates and replies whenever I have the time and energy to do so and asking the sages for help! As sentimental as it sounds, the biggest takeaway for me last year was to take care of yourself, even the ol' b**tard you call "you" isn't wrong all the time! A quick phone grab reveals what's been on the bench for the past few nights, more to be revealed shortly (although I will not make you go through everything that I did but didn't mention in 2023!). If you made it this far, dear reader, I sincerely appreciate it. Stay safe (and sane!) and happy modelling! Edit: ta for all the reactions, nice surprise on a Monday afternoon! Tomorrow will be a return to uni so understandably it won't be a grand return but still plan to update given a spare hour or two
×
×
  • Create New...