Jump to content
 

Jack785

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jack785

  1. On 20/01/2024 at 23:37, TechnicArrow said:

    Out of interest, what fiddleyard arrangement are you using?

     

    Missed this sorry - 2x Scale model scenery fiddle sticks on each side, which allow for approximately one loco and 2x Mk2s. I've not really got the space to have a more complex setup, as much as it would be helpful.

     

    Jack

  2. On 20/01/2024 at 18:16, The Bandit said:

    I love a micro - the small space demands plenty of thought and careful planning. Well done for showing the space-starved what can be achieved.

     

    Thanks for your kind words, I'd not modelled for 2.5 years prior to this partially due to lack of space, so I really hope I can inspire someone else to take the plunge and see what they can do.

     

    Jack

  3. On 20/01/2024 at 23:37, TechnicArrow said:

    Wonderful! I don't often see Modern Image Micro, but for a truly minimalistic layout, the setting works really well. This is practically what the Class 153 was built for! And for such a small space it's very recognisable, it instantly reminded me of a weekend I spent exploring the area back in Summer 2017.

     

    I think the only thing it would benefit from is a little brick hut, with an orange-clad signalman ready to operate the gates! And possibly an upper-quadrant semaphore to reinforce the area and era, but that could be overkill.

     

    Out of interest, what fiddleyard arrangement are you using?

     

    Cheers! I know, it's a shame really as the 153 is perfect for layouts like this. There are a few single line terminus style layouts and some features of larger layouts that have inspired me to make this, but I'd love to see more modern micros out there.

     

    I like that idea - after a bit of research I've discovered that the Bachmann depot maintenance workers pack has a fully hi-vis clad man with an arm stretched out which looks ideal for a "moving the gates" scene. Thank you for this, I'll post an update when he arrives. Regarding the brick hut, I'm considering making a low relief one for the left hand side of the crossing to occupy the space that would've been taken up by the other track before it was singled. Regarding the signal, I'd love a nice semaphore and I'd planned to put this at the end of the platform as a starting signal to protect the crossing, but I'm concerned that this would dominate the view, there isn't much room so I've tried to keep it as open as possible. Theoretically, I'm going with the idea that the signal has been resited to before the platform and off the scene because of this, but I might have a play around to see if I can get one in without it looking cluttered.

     

    Thanks,

    Jack

    • Like 1
  4. On 20/01/2024 at 18:15, jamest said:

    What a great idea, basically a picture, or scene, with a moving element to it.

     

    Really good, and the station structure is interesting and suits the layout well. Thanks for sharing it.

     

    Regards

    James

     

    Thanks - I really appreciate it. I liked the idea of using the station to force a single view of passing trains, I was concerned the station would look too "main line", as the model is intended to be just a part of a larger building. I think it works in situ though, the arched entrance is my favourite feature.

  5. This is "Strumpshaw", it's based on the Wherry Lines in East Anglia, set between 2016 & 2020. I'd wanted to replicate the pre-resignalling days, with manned crossings, sprinters & loco hauled stock, following a few summer trips to the region over this period. I've taken a lot of inspiration from other layouts for this one, "Cottleston" on here being the inspiration behind the disused platform/ rationalised platform end arrangement, for example.

    It's not completely done yet, it needs a fascia, some suitable road vehicles and a couple more small details adding, but it's on the way.

     

    The layout is DC with a fiddle stick at each end and is roughly 40 x 30cm at the base.

     

    GA 153 arrives with a Yarmouth service one summer evening

    1000013630-01.jpeg.adc789017fa1eb578143be04dddc7ba6.jpeg

     

    A 68 heading back towards Norwich, these operated up to 2017 covering for a damaged cl.170 unit1000013633-01.jpeg.64e39bc41c1648479c0ea44aef8a9699.jpeg

     

    DRS 37 heads back to the seaside with the "short set"

    1000013637-01.jpeg.e63e45d91a47c0fc9b2ff3608441d1f6.jpeg

     

    • Like 15
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  6. On 10/04/2020 at 11:16, 1722 said:

    Lovely work. Out of interest, what size is this built in. The photos give a real sense of space and then the overall shot is surprising in terms of the small area the layout takes. 

    Hi, thanks very much, the whole layout is 2ft x 6in. The scenic section takes up 17in of that, purely because this is the length of one piece of foamboard which was used for the backscene.

  7. On 10/04/2020 at 11:09, TechnicArrow said:

    A good reproduction of something I'd not come across before! I think all it needs is roofs over the cars, and more people - it feels very sparse with nobody, not even staff, on the platform.

     

    Would you also be able to share a few photos of the mechanical bits? I'm just about to start rebuilding the mechanism on my funicular railway (post coming soon!), so I'm interested to see what you've used for the pulleys.

    Thanks for your comments, I will add a few more people I think. Passengers are kept fenced away from the platforms when a tram is not stationary, but I think I'll bend the rules for that one to stop it looking so dormant! Roofs will be added shortly, or possibly two new cars will be built with roofs, which is how the tramway operated until recent years, with one open and one 'roofed' car on each track.

    Regarding the mechanism, I made a fairly bad mistake regarding gluing in some nice fragile fencing over the removal plasticard to access the mechanism, but I'll draw you a diagram.

    • Like 1
  8. Shipley Glen Tramway in 009
    The prototype is a 20'' gauge funicular in Saltaire, West Yorkshire, which was built in 1895 to transport tourists to a (now demolished) amusement park located at the top of the glen. It runs for approximately 1/4 mile.
    My model depicts the top station in present day and is driven by a simple DC motor with a DPDT switch to reverse polarity. The tramcars are built on Graham Farish N gauge "Shredded Wheat" coach chassis. The bench seats are also N gauge, as I wanted them to look smaller than usual like the prototype, but will be replaced by something a little more 4mm when this is all over!

    1080704.jpg

    IMG_20200407_175520_598.jpg

    IMG_20200407_175520_599.jpg

    IMG_20200407_175520_601.jpg

    • Like 14
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  9. This is without a doubt the best model of a preserved line I've ever seen. I've just read through the past 9 pages, and I'm absolutely hooked. Everything is incredibly accurate and it is so refreshing to see a model heritage railway where the purpose is not to ''run anything'' but to model it for what it is. As you said fairly early on, Pre-grouping classes from railways across the country hauling pristine, 25 wagon goods workings formed of one specific wagon type just doesn't cut it. I am (nearly!) a guard on one of the railways in the north referenced on here and in terms of character and atmosphere, it is essentially a mirror image. The choice of locos, wagons, yard clutter, figures and attention to detail regarding use/ development of original buildings is impeccable. My only comment would be regarding the P - Way riding van. In real life I have experienced these to be the grottiest of vehicles, more than any other regularly operating vehicle by far. Think boarded over windows, warped doors, corrosion, algae etc. The general consensus with these is that P way gangs often want one for obvious reasons, but don't have the skills or wish to maintain it as that is simply not their field of work, which is fair enough really. Not really gripe, just an idea for a future project? 

    Please keep up the good work and keep sharing it with us! Definitely following this one.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 2
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...