Jump to content
 

Trestrol

Members
  • Posts

    70
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Trestrol

  1. 8 hours ago, kevinlms said:

    2 things

     

    1/ Why would their archives on buying a franchise from the government, have anything from before 1/1/1948? Especially something written off (an obscure wagon at that)  from pre-WW2.

    2/ They must of had a good reason for their choice of trading name.

     

    Somewhere inbetween, lies the truth!

     

    7 hours ago, Wickham Green too said:

    In the context of rolling stock* there's no reason for a direct link but their archives SHOULD contain vast amounts if info on the fixed assets they're responsible for - such as York station !

     

    * hmmmm .... if a container has no wheels is it rolling stock ? 

    All the LNER archives are in Kew as far as I'm aware. I think the choice of trading name was decided by the DFT who will own the rights to it. It was only called LNER after it was taken in-house by the government after the failure of the franchise. They don't own York station it belongs to Network Rail.

    • Agree 2
  2. The Repair Shop is a good programme although even on the UK one some of the methods look a bit iffy. Dom on last night's was painting some large wooden wall plaque. Close up shot of a paint brush dipping in the paint, brush then lifted up and dribble paint everywhere. Anyone else get the feeling it's getting more about the sob story rather than the repair? Maybe it's just me getting a cynical old git in my old age. 

    • Like 4
    • Agree 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  3. See if you can get a copy of "North Eastern electrics: The History of the Tyneside electric passenger services 1904-1967 by Ken Hoole by Oakwood Press. It will be out of print but if you can obtain a copy it's a good start. Don't pay the silly Amazon price £80!?!? There are book sellers with it at sensible prices.

    • Agree 4
  4. 5 hours ago, Vanfit said:

     

    Pipe wagons (drop sided) were used but not as popular as their capacity per wagon was less.

    Sorry I have to disagree. Our yard was virtually exclusively Pipe wagons with at least 30 on site at the height of ECML electrification.  We had only about two Tube wagons in the yard. Maybe it was what was available at the time but that's the way it was.

    • Informative/Useful 1
  5. Don't forget they were very popular with BR S&T department after withdrawn from revenue service. Really good for pallets of concrete troughing. Easily loaded with a forklift due to the full length doors on the Pipes in particular. Signal posts and heads, location cases and cable drums as well.

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  6. 10 hours ago, Hal Nail said:

    As a complete aside, I was at Newcastle uni from Sept '87 and remember 03s there (in between lectures, obviously!) so could well have seen that one.

    There were only six 03063, 03066, 03078, 03084, 03112 and 03371(ex departmental 92) so you probably did. It was a sad day when the Class 08's took over. Newcastle was never the same.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  7. 3 hours ago, Forward! said:

    It would have been very unwise to re-adopt a 'teak' livery that would suggest a connection between modern MK1 stock and the previous wooden-bodied stock. As recently as 1952 the Harrow rail disaster had shown the latter up to be downright dangerous compared to their all-steel replacements.

     

    Crash worthyness has of a carriage is more than what the body is made of. If I remember correctly all the corridor carriages at Harrow were ex LMS. So fitted with screw couplings and BS gangways. Buckeyes and Pullman gangways do provided better protection against telescoping and help keep carriages upright. Ramming a carriage from behind at high speed doesn't do a carriage any good no matter what it's made of.

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...