Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

ShadowinLinby

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ShadowinLinby

  1. I totted up the cost of the components to make this crossover and it came out at around £10, relatively cheap I'd say when compared with the cost of buying a 3D printer! 

     

    ChrisB8G.jpeg.c81fcda5964670b1ff8e5960b41fedc7.jpeg

    • Like 3
  2. Or he could build them using 2mm shop stuff, a system that works. Whilst 3D printing has a place in 2mm modelling I remain to be convinced of of it's long term suitability for trackwork despite Wayne's efforts. Its another example of coming up with a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  3. The point I was trying to make was that there are a mass of people (speaking in general term rather than 2mm specific) who use the word can't before they even try the thing. I witness it all the time on the 2mm roadshows, my favourite being I can't see that! There is also a fear of failure as people wrongly assume failure is in the opposite direction to competence. Failure is actually part of the process of gaining competence. Have a go, get it wrong and learn.

    • Agree 4
  4. Where did your figure of 9.48 come from Tom. The association std for 4'8 8.5" track is 9.42. I'm also guessing you've assumed wrongly that you can make track from the components and gauges available from the 2mm shops.

     

    ChrisB

  5. Ian doesn't do himself justice, as along with his win for the coaches, his steam rail motor picked him up two more awards.

     

    Well done Ian

     

    ChrisB

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    • Round of applause 2
  6. James - the next ZAG meeting is tomorrow evening - details in the ZAG post on here. Pop in and say hello - we're a friendly bunch. Just remember, there will be members showing what they've been up to recently - don't be put off by what you see - remember the only difference between you and us is time and practice 

     

    ChrisB

  7. James - I would depending on where you live, either seek out your local area group our join in on the Zoom Area Group (ZAG) which happens on Saturdays twice a month, or if possible do both. You will find lots on helpful people who all started where you are, and will be more than happy to answer any questions you have.

     

    ChrisB

    • Agree 2
    • Thanks 1
  8. The drop in wheel sets are very easy to do and you can have a diesel converted very quickly. The 2mm FS Finetrac point kits are a good starter for a newbie to get a feel for point making. I would give fine scale a go and see how it suits you. Like everything different, it's about learning a few new skills. It's also about accepting that we learn by making mistakes. He who never made a mistake never made anything. 

     

    ChrisB

    • Agree 3
    • Thanks 1
  9. I use a combination of Easitrac plastic chairs on plastic sleepers and copper clad in vital areas i.e. the switch blade ends and under the crossing nose, which I've found to be suitable robust. Using this method the crossing nose, which is made using the Crossing Nose Webs (1-111) (and see my article in the Oct-Nov 2mm mag) means that the crossing nose is totally insulated.8G.jpeg.e8d9031df16e825eb7dbccfbdb8b6a23.jpeg 

  10. 23 hours ago, Southernfrance said:

    I love the look of 2mmFS and code 40 N but for me it's time versus size of layout. I'm seven years into my South London project "Brickmakers Lane" and to do this in either 2mmFS or code 40 N would have cost me lot more in both money and time, with close to 60 points to make instead of buy and (carefully) plant. I've narrowed all of the point spacings to more reflect the real thing too.. Yes, sometimes locos and stock wobbles a bit, but it doesn't put me off overly. I try to work out what is causing the problem and try to resolve it. I had a good go at this after wiring was finished and now that ballasted the bulk of the lower main lines and yards, i'm still finding little niggles with bits of ballast, dirty rail, or loco issues to resolve. It's gradually getting better, and it's now at a stage I'm happy with. I'll continue to add shims to the points that cause bouncing, and tweak stock as needed.  Here's a couple of pictures of the carriage yard exit onto the main and relief lines on the lower level. Most stock runs over this very well at slow speeds in all directions, but I do agree the slips are worse for any potential bouncing. Larger locos are obviously better than smaller, diesels like my Dapol 33 are way better than my Farish Jinty for example.

     

    It's horses for courses for me - complicated layout, lots of operation, not too long a timescale to complete - N; smaller layout, less operation, in same timescale - 2mmFS; compromise between the two  - code 40.

     

    Dave

    IMG_4311.jpeg

    IMG_4309.jpeg

    I would disagree with your comment that 2mFS point work is more costly. I've just costed out one of my hand built B8 point which comes out at about £7. This compares with around £18 for Peco Streamline and £29 for the comparable Fine Trax version.

     

    ChrisB

    • Agree 2
  11. 23 hours ago, Nick Mitchell said:

    Hi @queensquare, I'd seen your post - How appropriate you're Eureka moment happened in the Bath thread...

    The resistor and diodes you see in the picture are indeed the same ones I've used all along - I'm still using up the original quantities I found on eBay, as written about in the MRJ article.

    There are smaller resistors available (carbon film type on a little black chip) but I quite like these Mini-MELF ones.

    To save me looking through all my MRJ pile, what edition was the stay-live article in Nick

  12. Gary – it’s fairly simple – a dissatisfaction with what commercial N gauge offers and a desire for something better. You’ll need to learn some new skills and accept that you learn by getting it wrong. The only difference between you and what you see on here an Youtube is time. Fundamentally though the only way to know if it’s for you, is to join the association and give it a go.

    • Agree 3
  13. I use the std cost of a packet of fags to get over the value - at around £12 a packet in the UK £25 is about two packets which some people will go through in a two days. Triangular gauges will last you a life time. £25 for a lifetimes use look better value.

     

    ChrisB 

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...