mattingleycustom

1 hour ago, 2ManySpams said:

 

Certainly isn't the original plate:

 

To be honest, none of the numerals look quite right, and the spacing is off. You'd like to think an organisation like the NRM would get stuff like this right.

Oh, the NRM are quite proficient at it, the '4468' on the front of Mallard is too small.

You'd think a museum would do some proper research, like look at a photograph from the time she broke the speed record.

Glenn

Just spotted something:

... there's something wrong with this numberplate

I remember the Class 31s on the Cardiff trains at 'Froddington Central' in the 1970s, odd looking things when compared to the home team's Class 33s.

The Bachmann model looks to be a cracking representation of the Class, I do like the green ones with the two 'go faster' stripes.

Glenn

I used to enjoy a bit of weathering

Not a lot of limescale on this Bachmann 9F, but I have gone more mad in the past ... just can't find the photos right now.

Glenn

At last a model of an SR U1 ... oh no my mistake, it's that great big LNER U1.

Oh well, I shall continue to wait (im)patiently.

Glenn

Something I posted on the Hornby P2 new tooling thread a week or two ago:

I was looking at my pair: 2003 and 2005 and thought there was something not quite correct about the front end.

I think I have it spotted it now, on the Hornby models the curve of the running plate from above the cylinders to the front of the loco is too shallow; or put another way the gradient of this slope is too small, resulting in the casing being too deep for most of its length from cylinders to buffers.

On the models, at the front end where the first casing join behind the buffers is, the top of the casing/running plate is about level with the lower door of the 'Cod's mouth', whereas on the real thing (photo of 2006 borrowed below for reference) it is below the level of the hinges on the lower door.

Overall it's a minor thing that may have more to do with Hornby catering for the various combinations of front end on the first two and the production batch of four.

The lining could have been finer; the white line between the sloping front and smokebox side is too thick and the boiler bands should have a thicker black band between the white lines.

I will restate that these are minor points and overall the Hornby version is a fine model of an impressive prototype.

Glenn

I was looking at my pair: 2003 and 2005 and thought there was something not quite correct about the front end.

I think I have it spotted it now, on the Hornby models the curve of the running plate from above the cylinders to the front of the loco is too shallow; or put another way the gradient of this slope is too small, resulting in the casing being too deep for most of its length from cylinders to buffers.

At the front end where the first casing join behind the buffers is, the top of the casing/running plate is about level with the lower door of the 'Cod's mouth', whereas on the real thing (photo of 2006 borrowed below for reference) it is below the level of the hinges on the lower door.

I will restate that this is another minor point and overall the Hornby model is still a fine model of an impressive prototype.

19 hours ago, AdamOrmorod said:

Just got my replacement ToF this morning, smokebox seam is much better than the first one.

 

However, I noticed there's a small hole on the top of the smokebox front, presumably where the whistle on a double chimney example would fit.

 

 

Does anyone else's have this?

Yes, my ToF has the same 'feature'

Glenn

On 14/08/2023 at 09:56, E100 said:

 

Is the axle / wheel painting definitely centre?

No, on my 2003 I watched it at slow speed and the white lining is definitely not quite concentric with the wheel itself. On the whole it's a minor problem.

These locos are very good models but not quite excellent.

Glenn

7 hours ago, Johan DC said:

Taken with a rather old phone, in not the best of lights, but you can get the idea.  In real life, you have to look for it to see it. 

 

 

I wouldn't get too hung up on the gap between boiler and smokebox, that is truly minor.

If I had to criticise anything the white lining on the parabolic curve is too thick and the black lining on the boiler bands is too narrow; for reference Dapol have done a very good job with the boiler bands on the SR D1 Class locos.

All in all its a cracking model of an impressive loco.

Glenn

6 hours ago, MJI said:

 

SR Tons missing, no SUBs 4CORs or anything like that

I avoided mentioning the Electrics, but you have a point.

However: 2BIL, 2HAL, 5PUL from SR days and plenty more later BR(SR) stock: 2EPB, 4CEP, 4BEP, etc is available.

2BIL or not 2BIL?, that is the question ... sorry couldn't resist (again)

8 hours ago, palmsticks said:

 

I am told that the quickest way to get an accurate version of 2007 is to pay these people:

https://www.a1steam.com/p2donation#/

 

😉

I'd love to but they seem to have put the wrong front end on it and given it a silly name without a Scottish connection.

Glenn

I don't think there are any complaints from us SR modellers, once upon a time there wasn't a rtr SR coach worth the name but now we are spoiled with:

Hornby Maunsells, Bachmann Bulleids, pre-Grouping ex-SECR Birdcage, ex-LSWR Cross-Country LAV stock, plus the Gate stock and a few others.

Glenn

28 minutes ago, gwrrob said:

Indeed, over six years ago now I believe and the one where you went to the trouble of lining the cabside numbers.

Oh yes, I was having some fun with my bowpen. I think it turned out okay-ish, but I should have applied more weathering to the bright piping under the cab definitely.

One day I might get my railway room back!

2 hours ago, Steam here! said:

These are the bits I’m on on about that are missing from the accessory pack.

I’ve checked the loco have found the holes that these would go in, but tucked right in towards the top under the side skirts.

Them things are Guard Irons, fitted to all(?) locos to knock foreign objects off the rails before the wheels might hit them which might cause a derailment.

I was looking through some old photos and found this:

... one of yours Rob, I believe?

10 hours ago, Steam here! said:

Hi all, I picked my P2 on the other day 2003 “Lord President” and have just noticed in the accessory pack it’s missing the guard irons.

 

is anyone missing there’s?

 

Apart from that a really nice loco.

Has Lord President got the etched nameplates in the accessory pack?

As far as I remember the arrow was above the nameplates on the West Country locos and between nameplate and shield for the Battle of Britain variety of Bulleid Light pacific ...

... btw that is my rendition of 34085 with Golden Arrow regalia on the Fox Transfers website.

Glenn

LNER 2005 Thane of Fife arrived this morning in Hornby's 'bomb proof' packaging.

Glenn

3 minutes ago, Tim Dubya said:

 

There's a wants list under most manufacturers in the appropriate forum for each 👍

Therein lies the problem, I don't think any of really us care who manufactures the U Class, as long as they make a good job of it.

In the past I have written to Bachmann; perhaps 3 or 4 years ago and more recently to Rapido. I got a 'noted' from Bachmann and just the usual 'thank you for submitting your idea' automated response from Rapido.

However, as you so rightly say wrong thread - apologies to everyone who is here to discuss the LSWR Coach Sets

'The dimensional differences between the basic U subclasses were quite substantial, going well beyond a bit of detail variation.' - really?

The basics are that there were 20 of the former K Class tanks converted to U Class tender engines and 30 of the new build U Class engines.

Chassis, wheels and boiler are the same, running plates and cabs are different with two types of tender.

They are not simply N Class locos with 6ft drivers as the cabs and driving wheel spacing was different; in fact it is the same as the 3-cylinder U1 (and W class tanks) ... more scope for further models!

 ... just look at the lovely LSWR liveried 4-Set, that should keep me happy for a while.

On 02/08/2023 at 18:46, Mr chapman said:

Well I have treated myself to a LSWR set. Seems like a "you snooze you lose" release and I don't want to miss these :) 

I too have treated myself to one of these sets in LSWR livery. Salmon pink and brown sounds like an odd colour combination but it does look good; to my eyes at least.

Maybe a LSWR corridor set to follow? - with the coach sets you are spoiling us!

Glenn

... and the U Class 2-6-0 to haul these coach sets, that is coming soon?

(I know I do bang on about it)

Glenn

Up The Junction - Squeeze

Fool's Gold - Stone Roses