Jump to content
 

highpeakman

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About highpeakman

Profile Information

  • Location
    Close to the GN & GE Joint Rly north of Lincoln.
  • Interests
    Very broad interests but perhaps focused more on BR Midland - Derbyshire, Notts and Lincs areas in late 50s/60s - Wirksworth, Buxton, Cromford & High Peak in particular - Also GC Main Line around Nottingham + any Industrial railways (NG and Standard). Old enough to remember C&HP in working order, Trent Junction Station, Derby Works in full flow, Windcutters at Nottm Victoria, prototype Deltic at Grantham and a few other things I miss.A believer in modelling to capture the feeling/atmosphere of the time/prototype even if some details are not correct and of the right to run what I like.

Recent Profile Visitors

1,819 profile views

highpeakman's Achievements

736

Reputation

  1. That's an interesting possibility. However I know nothing about guitars or their strings except that there seem to be a lot of different ones (thickness and material). Do you have any recommendations for what type of string please? Thanks for your help.
  2. I purchase some of those clips as I can see that they could be very useful for such repairs. Got them today, clipped one to each side of the cable ready to align them and another part of the speedo cable broke away! Yes, I was gentle. Probably have to replace the whole cable with wire of some sort now! Trying to figure out if it is worth it although I was looking to sell the model.
  3. While changing the decoder on my Bachmann Standard 4MT Tank (32-351) I found that the speedo cable had snapped even though I had been careful with it when removing the body. I would imagine that this is a fairly common problem? Looking at the Bachmann drawing I can't see this part shown as a spare nor can I find it on the Bachmann site. It looks as if the cable might join end to end but I am not sure what type of glue would be best or most effective. Also trying to line up the two ends is proving remarkably difficult. Has anyone any suggestions for the best way to repair please?
  4. This is an impressive looking model. A friend of mine, who doesn't use computers, has just purchased one and is very happy indeed with it. He was, however, querying why the BR version is fitted with Class A (Express) lamps? Seems a curious choice that is puzzling us, but perhaps we are missing something? I have looked through this thread and saw several references to removing the lamps but, seemingly, no one questioning why.
  5. I would suggest Wirksworth as a possibility. A terminating branch line off the main Midland line it has bridges at each end. Station, Goods shed and engine shed. The lines continue through the station to exchange sidings with several quarries, some had private small locos. A couple of quarry feeder lines connected directly at the station yard including one through a tunnel. One quarry feeder later used an overhead conveyor to a loading dock. A theoretical link (never finally implemented) to the Cromford and High Peak Railway further up the hill. It could be operated with LMS stock, BR steam and BR diesels. As a test track for Derby Works it saw a whole range of stock including the Blue Pullmans and continues to do so as a heritage railway of course. Endless interpretations if you are liberal and want flexibility of operation.
  6. Yes, you are right. I looked at Google again. It looks like something is in the siding which i thought was the same vehicle but it isn't and is not the same track. The track that vehicle is on does have a connection.
  7. Resurrecting this thread, I also do have a question about this branch. I noticed on the YouTube video that there is a rail vehicle parked on an isolated siding at Liskeard between the station and the curve up to the main line. It can also be seen on Google. What is it and why is it there on an unconnected siding please? An old track maintenance vehicle? Just curious. 🤔
  8. This is for the Railroad version of the 9F which, although loco motored, it uses the chassis, etc of the original tender drive Hornby 9F and not the later, more detailed version of the 9F. As stated above it does match the one that was fitted to this particular model and is shown on the data sheet. I do suspect that different drawbars were fitted over time though but I am not sure if model numbers always changed to reflect that.
  9. Hi I have found your telephone number on The Model Shop Directory. Is it OK if i phone you to get details of the drawbar tomorrow?
  10. Oh heck! Really? I was hoping that the problem was limited to the tender as it was the (really) old design ad that the loco chassis was a later version avoiding it. I will check carefully. Thanks. If you are sure that you can spare the drawbar then I would appreciate having it. I am happy to pay for it and postage. Is there an email address (or facebook, whatever)I can use to advise my address and make payment somehow?
  11. Meant to say that your diagram of the drawbar are exactly the same as it shows on my parts leaflet but I am no longer sure how accurate that is. This model seems to be a strange combination of old and new parts. R2880.
  12. That's very helpful of you and your offer is much appreciated. However, hopefully though, to save you the time and effort of sending it, I am still wondering if I can fashion a new one out of sheet plastic. Unfortunately the old drawbar was not returned to me so I don't have it to check. I don't think the wires are needed as the loco runs on my rolling road without the tender. I just need to check if it has a step between the loco and tender and the distance between the two fixings. The pictures show the chassis support which has the coupling pin on it. Also the new centre replacement carrying the wheels.The old Mazak motor support is the bit that rotted and, of course, there was not a motor in the Railroad 9F! The new replacement part fits into the chassis support and yes, I agree, some extra weight will be attached. Provision also has to be made to add a fixing plate over the centre wheels.
  13. I now have the model back and the tender chassis has definitely rotted! I have removed the old chassis and I am about to fit a plastic printed replacement that I bought from Ebay. That looks straightforward enough. However a secondary problem is that, somehow, it seems the loco drawbar (Hornby X8846) has got broken. This is currently out of stock at Peter's Spares but I am also a bit confused by this part. That website suggests it is on a number of Hornby locos (Black 5, Merchant Navy, 8F, Q1, A4). It is wired to use the tender wheels as pick ups in addition to the loco. However the loco appears to run perfectly well on it's own without the tender being connected at all and, as the loco is a 2-10-0 I would have thought that picking up from the loco should not be a problem. Peter's Spares also shows another drawbar part X8864 for the 9F that has no wires although that is different to a picture on Ebay which does show wires. Very confusing! Which 9F is that for and will it fit the Railroad 9F? I would appreciate any clarification please or any other suggestions to replace the drawbar as £9 + postage seems a high price to pay for a simple piece of plastic. Is it simple enough to fashion out of plastic sheet or is there any hidden potential problem?
  14. Shouldn't be much wear on any of the wheels as it hasn't really run much. I will investigate as soon as it is back in my hands from the buyer. It appears there may be a case of mazak rot in the chassis. Thanks for suggestion anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...