Jump to content
 

Mark C

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mark C

  1. Just now, Roy Langridge said:

    Definitely not a new tooling 47 as the cab front footsteps are in the right place. 
     

    Roy

    ..yes, and there are no holes in the cab front for the later-style/more common ETH jumper...

     

    Mark

  2. 18 hours ago, MikeParkin65 said:

    Interesting review in this months RM where the 47 shares a page with the same manufacturers rereleased 57 with photos from the same angle.  Certainly the 47 sits lower on the bogies than the 57 and I think raising the new model a little would improve its look. Hornby mag meanwhile has commented on the ‘face’ being wrong - an interesting stance from they have their own Ltd ed from the tooling. 

    By contrast, doesn't the face of the 47 on the front cover of the same Hornby Magazine simply look just right (I suspect it is a pre-2021 tooling Bachmann version)...

  3. On 02/02/2024 at 02:32, P.C.M said:

    I was a shunter at Eastleigh east yard for a while in the early 90s.

    We used to loose shunt although management didn't like us doing it they used to let it go on.

    We did get a bollocking for loose shunting car flats and TTAs one time. 😁

    We also did Fly shunting a few times which is different to loose shunting in that the shunt loco pulls the wagon towards the points. The shunt loco backs off just enough to loosen the coupler then speeds up past the point which is then changed before the wagon comes past. Hopefully the wagon has enough speed to go in clear to be pinned down.😁

     

    Cheers Peter.

    There's a fascinating sequence in the East Anglian By-Ways (sic) DVD filmed in the late-60s of a Brush Type 4/Class 47 fly shunting 16 ton mineral wagons in Cromer yard (fortunately it is D1565 - which has saved me having to renumber the Bachmann model).  The skill of the shunter uncoupling wagons on the move is readily apparent.

     

    Mark

     

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  4. 4 minutes ago, andyman7 said:

     

    Understood - I live south of London. However, John Dutfield is half an hour by train out of Liverpool Street station and I fancied an afternoon out. It was just a personal choice, but also based on the store itself being an Aladdin's Cave of stock with no internet listings so well worth an enjoyable rummage...

    I second that: I had a happy 12 months contracting for Essex County Council in County Hall...just a few minutes' walk from John Dutfield (as long as you remember they're closed on Wednesdays!)...

     

    • Like 3
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  5. 15 hours ago, MrWolf said:

    I hope it's ok to reproduce here for illustrative purposes.

    A Wills' N7 (Not N2 as I thought) posed over a shed inspection pit, used on a mid 1960s edition of MRC.

     

    IMG_20240122_234512.jpg.19ea3213aedec5dbfc14c2d4f16344a7.jpg

     

    Taken from Model Railway Constructor Annual 1983, published Ian Allan 1982*

     

     

    *I was eleven!!

    See "Backscene" (page 130) from the current edition of Model Rail - there is a connection between them!

     

    Regards

    Mark

     

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  6. On 21/01/2024 at 11:17, MJI said:

    Does anyone know a good source of turned buffer heads 13 inch?

     

    Wsnt to get a few to detail moulded buffer body kits.

     

    MJT out of stock.

     

    Need 8 at moment

     

    A bit late perhaps, but try H&A Models' own product - https://www.hamodels.net/4mm-steel-wagon-buffer-heads-pack-12.html

     

    ...they are also a good source of so many things and with an excellent mail order service too (and good to chat with too at exhibitions).

     

    Regards

    Mark

     

    • Like 1
    • Agree 3
  7. On 24/11/2023 at 18:28, OnTheBranchline said:

    Not going to lie, I was kind of holding my breath that the loco would go around the curves and not derail and fall to its demise... 

    There is one doing just that (going round the curves bit, not falling to its' demise...) at Holkham Hall's Christmas by candlelight event, where there is a Christmas tree ringed by four circuits of track - one of which has a 15xx merrily towing three Gresley coaches...

     

    Mark

    • Like 2
  8. 5 hours ago, StuartMc said:

    After the discussions on communications above, it's worth me letting you know that Tim replied promptly to an email request  (timhornlasercut@gmail.com) this week and I've put in an order for delivery just after Christmas. He also very kindly offered to assemble and deliver them, at no extra cost, as I'm fairly close to Fakenham.

     

    I won't include the prices as they are volitile due to changing wood costs, but to give you an idea of the current range; his standard options are:

     

    Scenic/Photoplank  (with backscene/pelmet and "frame" ) - each end is either either "open" (to join to other boards) or closed (at the end of the layout)

     

    The standard sizes for this are either 12", 18" or 24" wide by 2, 3 or 4 foot long.

     

    Standard baseboards same sizes

     

    Turntables/sector plates start at 3ft x 1ft

     

    Traverser example 4ft x 2ft

     

    Other sizes are also available

     

    Stuart

    You will not be disappointed...

     

    Mark

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  9. 3 hours ago, andyman7 said:

    Here's an original early 70s built MTK Peak with the original supplied twin K's motor bogies - and it works! Prior to the availability of the Mainline model this would have been a seriously exotic presence on a model railway

    IMG_20220825_192238.jpg

    I've got one of these in long-term storage (pretty much since the 70's, consequent to the arrival of the Mainline model, along with a Class 47!) - but I utilised MTK's own power bogies.  They had a novel design utilising a layshaft that enabled 3-axle drive (or, by omitting the layshaft, unpowered) and pickups incorporated with the brass axle bearings.  I'm sure that with a bit more work they would have performed well, but they never quite did for me - the frames, layshaft and gears were moulded in a greasy sort of plastic, which was probably not ideal.

     

    The Class 47 was powered by twin K's motor bogies which generally spun on the spot without much movement on the track.

     

    On Wright Writes there is a photograph of my MTK Class 03, which was much more successful (until the Mainline version, again).

     

    Like many others, I learned a lot from building MTK kits...

     

    Anyway, back to the original topic...

     

     

    Mark

     

    • Like 3
  10. 1 hour ago, Northmoor said:

    Thanks for the advance warning - I have the 1/72 HAR.5 amongst at least three "whirli-clopters" in the round tuit pile.

     

    As with the large scale version, sadly much of the interior will be hidden once the fuselage is buttoned up which might focus attention on the cockpit through those large - and very clear - windows, and in getting that absolutely right.  The 1/48 version incorporates the interior as a sub-assembly, including walls, floor, bulkheads etc which is then incorporated into the fuselage.  Although there has been some discussion regarding the resultant thickness of the walls, especially where visible at the doors' edges, I think it will work well in the larger scale.

     

    I suspect that Airfix will further develop this new tooling into more variants.  A yellow RAF air sea rescue example will certainly stand out amongst the others!!

     

    Does your to do pile include an MV-22 Osprey?  I've been watching them over the last couple of weeks in Norfolk...most impressive...(I have a 1/72 Hasegawa example in mine)...

     

     

    Mark

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  11. Barry

     

    The review/builds on Britmodeller certainly suggest it is a fabulous kit.  No doubt, over the next few months all sorts of Xtradecals, resin and etched add-ons, and paint masks will be released just to add to the mix.

     

    Yes, the current 1/72 Airfix kit is a step above its' predecessor - and other manufacturers' I believe.  Here's a few of my work in progress HAR.3 from that latest iteration, together with a few etched add-ons...

     

     

    Mark

     

    DSCF1703-1.jpg

    DSCF1704-1.jpg

    DSCF1706-1.jpg

    • Like 6
    • Craftsmanship/clever 5
  12. I did the same with Millholme's version of the Ivatt Class 4 and ended up (part) building Crownline's version (with the milky bar boiler and firebox) instead, which was much more successful (there are pictures a few hundred pages back on this thread).  Bachmann's later incarnation put paid to its' completion...though maybe one day...

     

     

    Mark

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...