-
Posts
4,473 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Everything posted by Roy Langridge
-
Mark 5, By Accurascale
Roy Langridge replied to Accurascale Fran's topic in Accurascale / Irish Railway Models
There will probably be some political pressure through the DfT to take the Mk5s thus avoiding bad news as we run towards a general election. Roy -
Sutton's Locomotive Works *NEW* Class 25
Roy Langridge replied to Nick G's topic in Smaller Suppliers
And you are now the proud winner of a ticket to the back of the queue 😉 Roy -
Hornby Trading Statement Published 22 April
Roy Langridge replied to The Stationmaster's topic in Hornby
Don’t need software, it is easily configured in DCC. Roy -
I didn’t unfortunately. I was trained as an electronic engineer so relatively simple for me. I am away at the moment, when I am back I will pop the body off and take some photos. Roy
-
Funny, when I look at 00, I see 9 steam, 11 diesel, most rolling stock. Roy
-
I hardwired a small decoder in my four, a Zimo a MX616R by memory. A fairly straightforward job. Roy
-
I can’t help feeling that there is confusion here between writting off assets and recovering the costs of tooling. You can recover the costs, i.e. recoup the costs of paying for the tooling costs, and make your desired profit margin on a first run. That tooling still has value on the books, but there is no hole as alluded to above. Roy
-
Cavalex Models All new RTR HAA and variants in 4mm scale
Roy Langridge replied to Grimleygrid's topic in Cavalex
Saltaire crosses included on this sheet from @railtec-models if you want to add them: https://www.railtec-models.com/showitem.php?id=1045 Roy -
We all know the sea food diet joke Andy 😉 Roy
-
Don’t forget that the price of Bachmann is regularly discountedand the that Accurascale stock rarely gets discounted. In both cases profit will be being made, the costs are broadly similar in my opinion and the business models not so vastly different. Roy
-
Heljan OO Gauge Co-Bo Returns - Exclusively at Rails
Roy Langridge replied to AY Mod's topic in Rails of Sheffield
That is often said, but I had no issues converting mine to DCC. I wonder if the tolerances are a bit wayward? Roy -
47s were quite squat, and ironically did look a bit tubby. As soon as I saw a head-on photo of the Heljan offering it looked “pinched” and too tall/thin, and that was without comparing it. Roy
-
Class 50, By Accurascale
Roy Langridge replied to Accurascale Fran's topic in Accurascale / Irish Railway Models
Looks pretty much spot on to me compared to photos at the same angle on Flickr. Roy -
The 104 is looking like it may be one of Heljan’s crackers. I am looking forward to it, but my don’t pre-order Heljan rule still applies. Roy
-
Indeed we did as it was a model I really wanted, but as you say, that was only when they reached a price point where I was happy to do work needed. As I and others have said, if they are are going to command the highest prices, they need to do better. Roy
-
NG7 Announcement (Quarry Hunslet, Slate Waggons & Scenecraft buildings)
Roy Langridge replied to Paul.Uni's topic in Bachmann
Very nice and, rather unfortunately, very tempting. Can I justify these? Going to be a bit of a battle and I am not sure which side of me will win. Roy -
I think all the time people argue that poor models are ok the drive to do better is diminished. The 45, people argued that the flat sides were ok, they are not. The 25’s cab shape and doors are incorrect. The 18100 has beading missing, the PWM was badly designed and assembled. All this, but you still get some saying there is nothing wrong. Or do some modelling. I am not against doing modelling, but at today’s prices the base model should be correct. Roy
-
Indeed, it is that level of honesty in reviews that is needed. I have bought models before that had glowing reviews to spot errors instantly when unboxing them. That used to be a bit annoying, but with the cost of models / state of economy today, and with spend being more targeted, it now goes beyond that. I too wonder about the Heljan business model. Basic errors are let “slip through” sometimes to be corrected on later models, sometimes not. Often these have been pointed out. Why so? As I have said numerous times, Heljan can make some crackers and nearly always have great mechanical performance, they should be knocking others out of the park. Where Heljan choose to go up against other manufacturers, they must at least get it right, aiming to be as good and able to exist alongside the competition, if not beating it. Roy
-
NG7 Announcement (Quarry Hunslet, Slate Waggons & Scenecraft buildings)
Roy Langridge replied to Paul.Uni's topic in Bachmann
That is my thoughts and ties in with them being at the Statfold Model Railway Exhibition Roy -
Definitely not a new tooling 47 as the cab front footsteps are in the right place. Roy
-
Fore and aft does not allow for changes in gradient on a curve if you have camber for example. You don’t need a lot of movement, but gravity is your friend as locos tend to sit at their lowest natural point. Pick a real 47 up by its body and see how much movement there is in relation to the bogies. Roy