Jump to content
 

West Highland Line V4, a 1980's West Highland Line layout


young37215
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

Hi Rob et al,

 

This has proved an interesting debate and you do find some great photos on Flickr. I have looked at the excellent Robert Carroll PTMs. While they show the plan, photos suggest that it varied from day to do depending, presumably,  on coach availability and demand.

 

I plan to start with two rakes on my layout (O gauge is expensive!). One will be a typical 2 coach off season train which depending on the year could be almost any combo of brake and non brake, but I think BSOT-TSO is about as typical as I can get. Like this photo.

 

https://scotphoto.com/product/class-370127-heads-a-two-carriage-mallaig-to-f-william-train-nr-mallaig/

 

A Mk1 or 2 BFK might be better for some years but they’re currently difficult in O gauge.

 

The other rake will be the 1982 observation car rake with SC1999 Lochaber (which I have a cunning plan to build). I’m basing this on the 1983 formation minus the second observation car. So it will be TSO,BSOT,TSO,BSK plus the saloon. Any observation on that formation would be gratefully received.

 

Looking again at your photos (and being slightly mischievous!), I’d say the other type of brake not evident in your photos in a standard BSO without the buffet. I think I can make out a feint red line on all your BSO contenders but could be wrong. I know they did appear, but I think the non buffet versions were one of the rarer brake vehicles.

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
59 minutes ago, thegreenhowards said:

Looking again at your photos (and being slightly mischievous!), I’d say the other type of brake not evident in your photos in a standard BSO without the buffet. I think I can make out a feint red line on all your BSO contenders but could be wrong. I know they did appear, but I think the non buffet versions were one of the rarer brake vehicles.

 

Nothing mischievious, you are correct in what you say based upon my research which is also consistent with the PTM's. Whilst the SCR retained a small allocation of of BSO's according to my 1982 Coaching Stock book, most had been converted to BSOT by then. What the residual BSO's were used for or where they were allocated I do not know. 

 

For completeness, a quick Flickr search reveals some examples of Glasgow Oban consists of varying lengths. 37014 booked summer load 6 September 1981. The Mk1 BFK at the front is not available in OO, I think the rear coach is a BSK/BSOT but can't see clearly enough to identify it. 

 

07/09/1981 - Oban, Argyll and Bute, Scotland.

 

37192 in 1982, load 6 including adjoining BSOT and BSK

 

37192 Oban 14/09/82

 

37081 summer 1983, load 6 includes BSOT and BSK again

 

37.081 'Loch Long' backs the train out of the arrival platform at Oban. Jul'83.

 

37039 Autumn 1983, load 3 includes a BSK

 

37039 Oban 28/10/83

 

Another Autumn 1983, 37112 load 4 with just a BSK

 

37112 Oban 22/10/83

 

March 1984, 37175 approaches Tyndrum Lower with load 3 including a BSOT and a what appears to be a CK. I am always interested in pictures with a CK as I use them in my 4 coach rakes to provide first class accomodation. The SCR retained a few CK's into the 1980's although they were not that common on the WHL with first class whilst it existed usually provided by a Mk2 BFK.

 

37175 Tyndrum Lower 260384

 

 

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

I poured over the PTM relevant for 1983 and hand wrote the set credentials for my own layout. Interesting that many services have a BSK stipulated but watching video of the West Highland Cine filmed in 1983 with train time and reporting numbers included in the narrative it’s obvious that the PTM was not hard and fast with BSK/BFK/BCK all seeming fair game. Maybe a TSO missing from a set. I note that the FW - MLG and return (mixed train) is set as BCK/TSO/TSO but I have seen this set with BSK/TSO/SK. It would appear that within reason a mild application of rule1 would be reasonably palletable. Nothing to radical.

I really enjoyed going through all that yesterday evening so thanks again for the link.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, mallaig1983 said:

I poured over the PTM relevant for 1983 and hand wrote the set credentials for my own layout. Interesting that many services have a BSK stipulated but watching video of the West Highland Cine filmed in 1983 with train time and reporting numbers included in the narrative it’s obvious that the PTM was not hard and fast with BSK/BFK/BCK all seeming fair game. Maybe a TSO missing from a set. I note that the FW - MLG and return (mixed train) is set as BCK/TSO/TSO but I have seen this set with BSK/TSO/SK. It would appear that within reason a mild application of rule1 would be reasonably palletable. Nothing to radical.

I really enjoyed going through all that yesterday evening so thanks again for the link.

 

Is there an easy way to distinguish an SK from a TSO externally? i.e. looking along a train from a picture without being able to see the interior layout

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The vents on the roof are offset to the compartment side if you look from above. I’ve always found it hard to tell them apart from a trackside angle but if it’s a video a careful eye will notice it’s easier to see through a TSO as it passes. Other than that I think you need to be lucky enough to see the number. 


I’m thinking a lot of peoples memories off compartments were in the BSK or BCK vehicles but although it rare an SK appears feasible.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold

Mallaig slumbers before it is lifted so that I can motorise the 2 bracket signals and fine tune some of the scenery. Elsewhere I have managed to acquire an additional SO and have 2 more that I already had to replace SK's. The SK's will be disposed of and are now listed on Ebay should anyone be interested.

 

1371512792_230622(2).thumb.JPG.0aa79a7c1edfa768e6e503e0df8f3500.JPG

 

413436603_230622(3).thumb.JPG.016350f6127c18b904cc9a1e31fcf53c.JPG

 

344444349_230622(6).thumb.JPG.97effc6e81e64d81197237926677ae4a.JPG

 

1660962373_230622(5).thumb.JPG.c576a53d9666109cda05fe89a292b7c2.JPG

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, young37215 said:

Elsewhere I have managed to acquire an additional SO and have 2 more that I already had to replace SK's. The SK's will be disposed of and are now listed on Ebay should anyone be interested.


Over the years I bought stock in preparation for my ‘retirement’ layout.  Sadly I gave little thought to what I really needed and bought many  things just because I liked them.  In the case of coaching stock that was also tempered by what was available too.  They say ignorance is bliss.   I have, however, ended up with an imbalance of stock which yes, I could run but it wouldn’t be quite right.  Do I just apply rule 1 while I seek  to redress that imbalance?  I don’t know.

 

For similar reasons to those outlined above I have a handful of maroon mk1 second open coaches.  I wonder how hard it would be to re-livery them and make a passable job of it.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
11 minutes ago, BoD said:

I have, however, ended up with an imbalance of stock which yes, I could run but it wouldn’t be quite right.  Do I just apply rule 1 while I seek  to redress that imbalance?  

I’d just live with it for now, I’m in a similar position for a few items needed but it’s going to take a year or two to build the basic layout so I’ll concentrate on that while I wait. If you wait for the stock before starting you’re just losing time 😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 hours ago, BoD said:


Over the years I bought stock in preparation for my ‘retirement’ layout.  Sadly I gave little thought to what I really needed and bought many  things just because I liked them.  In the case of coaching stock that was also tempered by what was available too.  They say ignorance is bliss.   I have, however, ended up with an imbalance of stock which yes, I could run but it wouldn’t be quite right.  Do I just apply rule 1 while I seek  to redress that imbalance?  I don’t know.

 

For similar reasons to those outlined above I have a handful of maroon mk1 second open coaches.  I wonder how hard it would be to re-livery them and make a passable job of it.  

I’d be interested in people’s experiences of painting blue grey. I’ve always found maroon easy and blood &custard harder but possible with use of the lining decals to cover the join. But blue grey looks very hard with the curves round the grey at the ends and ultra thin lining. I’m minded to have a go at cutting up a couple of Lima or Darstead mk1s to make a blue grey BFK, but the painting is putting me off.

 

Andy

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thegreenhowards said:

I’d be interested in people’s experiences of painting blue grey. I’ve always found maroon easy and blood &custard harder but possible with use of the lining decals to cover the join. But blue grey looks very hard with the curves round the grey at the ends and ultra thin lining. I’m minded to have a go at cutting up a couple of Lima or Darstead mk1s to make a blue grey BFK, but the painting is putting me off.

 

Andy

Have you tried transfers? I heard some company does coach bodyside ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Just now, 6990WitherslackHall said:

Have you tried transfers? I heard some company does coach bodyside ones.

I did look at that. But the only ones I can find in 7mm are by Aquitrain and they only do the more common coach types. I might use one of their sides to go over the horrible jumble of parts I’d have left for the other coach after the conversion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thegreenhowards said:

I did look at that. But the only ones I can find in 7mm are by Aquitrain and they only do the more common coach types. I might use one of their sides to go over the horrible jumble of parts I’d have left for the other coach after the conversion!

 

Electra Rail graphics do full liveries for coaches and locomotives. I learned about them on Model Rail when Chris Leigh used a set of Porterbrook coach bodyside transfers to make a barrier coach.

 

 

Here's the link. Hope it helps.

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://electrarail.co.uk/&ved=2ahUKEwjQ65_7_tX4AhWMS0EAHcW5DcMQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw2wNcRTJvzCtNF80H0U-1zF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
14 hours ago, BoD said:


Over the years I bought stock in preparation for my ‘retirement’ layout.  Sadly I gave little thought to what I really needed and bought many  things just because I liked them.  In the case of coaching stock that was also tempered by what was available too.  They say ignorance is bliss.   I have, however, ended up with an imbalance of stock which yes, I could run but it wouldn’t be quite right.  Do I just apply rule 1 while I seek  to redress that imbalance?  I don’t know.

 

For similar reasons to those outlined above I have a handful of maroon mk1 second open coaches.  I wonder how hard it would be to re-livery them and make a passable job of it.  

 

The disease of most modellers, we like something so we buy it and end up with more rolling stock than our layouts really need. I am currently looking at ways to increase the number of storage sidings on WHL4 for exactly the same reason. 

 

Based upon my recent experience of respraying a loco in just BR blue, I would not attempt to respray a coach in blue and grey. Too fiddly and time consuming by half plus I doubt that many of us would be capable of getting near the level of factory finish we are all used to. Trying to put a positive spin on BoD's position and given the way model prices have risen,  I suspect that selling the maroon stock on Ebay will return at least what was paid. This leaves you free to re-invest the proceeds as you see fit in rolling stock that meets your current requirements.  I know Ebay has its limitations and is expensive but my experience is that it is the best way I have found for exchanging rolling stock. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 14/07/2022 at 14:13, young37215 said:

new Accurascale Deltic 55001 to give it a run out. It seems a fine model and droned happily around WHL4 for a while reprising the return Oban to Edinburgh adexs that ran in the early 1980's which utilised the push pull Mk3 rolling stock usually found working between Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Rob,

 

And it doesn't look 'out of place' at all. Great stuff.

 

Ian

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

In between operations I have been looking at outstanding work on passenger rolling stock. I had previously detailed one of my two Hornby BSO's and finally got around to doing the second. The coach comes apart quite easily although the retaining lugs that secure the bodyshell to the chassis are very brittle and snap easily. Fortunately this does not cause too many issues when fitting everything back together. The detailing is very simple, I paint the table tops to break up the factory finished single colour and add a few passengers. Once paint and glue is dry the coach is put back together and rejoins the fleet as part of an Oban rake. 

 

I have one more TSO to renumber and detail before adding this as an SK replacement. I had hoped to find a couple more TSO's to replace SK's and was watching an Ebay auction of 5 blue and grey coaches that included 3 TSO's which ended yesterday in the hope that I might sneak a late bid. When the price for the 5 reached £225 I decided that I would wait for another opportunity. 

 

Untouched internal 

 

1595471309_160722(11).thumb.JPG.5d2e24c52d0053a64d8efee621ca3e70.JPG

 

Table tops painted

 

2107565110_160722(12).thumb.JPG.89a44ee8b52359c21fc2eef8f7d8f87d.JPG

 

Passengers added

 

1517867181_160722(4).thumb.JPG.ed8253cfe631a82842eee9ccfc0860dd.JPG

 

Completed coach

 

2125818504_160722(7).thumb.JPG.eebe6a84093341247686d0ae9a6e458d.JPG

Coach is returned to the layout

 

2066510923_160722(9).thumb.JPG.810c4e447a535dff42441ddbf00d9580.JPG

  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob. Makes such a difference just by adding some passengers and repainting the table tops. When renumbering Hornby MK1’s, What method do you use to remove the original numbers without damaging the blue underneath? 
Cheers, Bill. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
11 hours ago, young37215 said:

When the price for the 5 reached £225 I decided that I would wait for another opportunity. 


Strewth.

That’s silly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BoD said:
11 hours ago, young37215 said:

When the price for the 5 reached £225 I decided that I would wait for another opportunity. 


Strewth.

That’s silly.

No kidding! I recently paid just £25 on eBay for a Hornby Mk1 BSO in blue/grey, so 5 would have been circa £125 not £225. Someone was sure desperate for those particular coaches.

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The price of models in general is crazy at present, I guess that like so many things model stocks are in short supply given the disruption caused by Covid. ISW has done well to pick up the Hornby BSO, I have been looking out for one for a while but have not seen any appear on Ebay.

 

21 hours ago, billywhizz said:

Hi Rob. Makes such a difference just by adding some passengers and repainting the table tops. When renumbering Hornby MK1’s, What method do you use to remove the original numbers without damaging the blue underneath? 
Cheers, Bill. 

 

It was a while ago that I renumbered my two BSO's meaning I can't be certain about how I removed the printed number. However I have only ever used T Cut or IPA for transfer removal so it will have been one of the two. What I do recall is how thin the Hornby paint is and that I managed to removed some of it despite what I thought was careful rubbing of the number. You have been warned...

 

The hot weather means I am spending time indoors in an effort to keep cool. Ironically the loft is one of the coolest places in the house when all the windows are open and the blinds closed hence why I have been working on the layout. Like others I have a habit of buying too much rolling stock which has left me with a shortage of siding space. The main fiddle yard was largely as built 5 years ago and had potential for an additional run round loop and extra sidings. I have added a 14th loop and managed to create and extend other sidings creating a total of 4000 mm of extra storage. Put another way that is space for about 28 OAA/OBA sized wagons or 10 coaches, my challenge is to use the space for existing rolling stock rather than see it as an opportunity to buy more!. 

 

Before changes

 

1202168444_170722(1).thumb.JPG.062b924b941ab854aa0d31216c2ebe03.JPG

 

806323526_170722(2).thumb.JPG.641d31f394392c809d8277ee80d75cd0.JPG

 

With changes, the control panel has been moved and an extra loop installed using the 3 way point and a double slip.

 

991830051_170722(10).thumb.JPG.a90cb7b586fb9807e5fd00ef6cdc0544.JPG

 

214580344_170722(11).thumb.JPG.4cd538df89c79e6adc71a774d7460555.JPG

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, young37215 said:

 my challenge is to use the space for existing rolling stock rather than see it as an opportunity to buy more!. 

 

 

Good luck with that!

 

I extended mine to 14 roads by squeezing the track spacing slightly, but I still keep buying so have resorted to cassettes and boxes of loose coaches!

 

7D424928-1468-44E8-88F0-563EA1B0B155.jpeg.4fb20e845adce9a55485a5342baa873a.jpeg
 

539BDDE9-C7BF-414E-A47B-70F9A7C30A02.jpeg.5f42230d655ffaec0fca9a0239f0a7e2.jpeg

 

NB. This is my OO which is ‘transition era’. My O gauge stock which I normally show on here is 1980s WHL and If I ever get to the same storage problems in 0 gauge, I’ll be divorced with my bank manager banging on the door!

Edited by thegreenhowards
Inserting quote correctly
  • Like 3
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob. 
thanks for the tip. I have tried using T Cut and cocktail stick and found it is very easy to damage the blue underneath the number. With the Hornby shade of blue being a tad dark, it is very difficult to get a good match when touching up afterwards. I currently have 2 BSO’s waiting conversion to BSO(T) 

Cheers, 

Bill. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...