Jump to content
 
  • entries
    89
  • comments
    85
  • views
    47,810

MiniNatur Tree making


SNCF stephen

1,534 views

Some replies to my last blog were interested in the MiniNatur products I had purchased. Since I was making a batch of trees up this weekend I thought I would post a blog about how I found the material to work with.

 

I must start by saying that I am not the best modeller in the world and as such I think someone could do a better job at these than me. However, if you have not seen this product in use before I thought that you might be interested to read my findings.

 

I had a few spare tree armatures in my modelling boxes from the last batch of trees I made. Therefore I decided to make 3 trees of roughly the same size. Unfortunately I only had one design of armature so I tried to bend them so that they looked a little different.

blogentry-6976-0-88611900-1347205522_thumb.jpg

The armatures are from Woodland Scenics and are a slightly grey shade of brown. Ideally I would have sprayed them browner.

blogentry-6976-0-13578400-1347205543_thumb.jpg

The MiniNatur product comes in a small plastic box and is made of larger size scatter material (for the leaves) interwoven with a plastic type of thread that is quite stretchy. There are also some fibres similar to flocking fibres in there too to make it seem a bit more substantial and branchlike.

blogentry-6976-0-58222200-1347205560_thumb.jpg

Inside each box is enough to do about 3 or 4 trees in N Gauge. I would have liked a bit more for my money but I did buy it without having a proper look at the details.

I used tacky PVA glue to attach the trees to the armatures. This allowed a quicker drying time.

blogentry-6976-0-27716000-1347205578_thumb.jpg

I started by doing a Beech tree which is a lighter shade of green. It seemed to work fairly easily. The product wraps around each main branch of the armature and can be woven into the smaller branches for extra strength. I found that my initial attempts were not as good because I did not stretch the material out enough.

blogentry-6976-0-16278700-1347205596_thumb.jpg

The oak material (pictured above) was thicker and better to work with. It would stretch further and gave better coverage.

 

I had to go back over some of the branches and make sure there was enough coverage.

 

Overall I was quite pleased with the results. It is a better system than the Woodland Scenics Fine Leafed Foliage (which I have not got on with), but I must say that I think that their kits for generic trees are better value for money than these if you want non descript trees in the background. I will probably use these kits again for key trees but not for the ones in the background.

 

Finally here are a few shots of the trees in situ:

blogentry-6976-0-10181300-1347205614_thumb.jpg

blogentry-6976-0-45817300-1347205650_thumb.jpg

blogentry-6976-0-83126400-1347205669_thumb.jpg

blogentry-6976-0-12290700-1347205687_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Many thanks for the details! It seems like its a ready made version of the effect you can produce with fine scatter type material hair-sprayed to pastiche or similar. It certainly captures the "openness" of a real tree, which I think is the key difference between a good model and a bad one!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I think if there was more of the product included in a pack or it was cheaper then it would be good value for doing a lot of trees quite well in a reasonable amount of time. As it stands it is not bad but it could just be a bit better.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...