Jump to content
 

Lofty

  • entries
    18
  • comments
    9
  • views
    4,364

A layout in the sky!


AllScales

525 views

As I mentioned on the last post on Gerlos, I would be starting a new blog for the new layout...

 

Even though construction on the loft conversion hasn't even started, I'm already planning what's going to go in it. The original plan had Gerlos moved up into the loft where I had envisaged to fix two problems it:

 

The ramp up to the upper level station on one side was a considerable 4%. This severely limited the length of train that most of my loco's can haul when going that way round.

 

The second major problem was the lack of height difference between the lower station and the upper station meaning it all looked a bit, meh!

 

So the plan was to extend layout on one side to allow for a longer climb to the upper station. By making this around 3.5m in linear distance, I could also raise the upper station to a giddy 10cm above baseboard with a <3% gradient! The other ramp could easily go that high as it was already approximately 3.5m long.

 

However then a third limitation shows up: A lack of depth, the layout is only 3 feet deep. And this would mean lots of near vertical rock faces. So it wasn't really going to look very good.

 

The loft offers other possibilities, the internal surface will around 6x3.6m (20x12), which would give a usable floor space of around 15x12x20 (allowing for the door and a place to put a radiator (never directly under the layout!). Plenty of space for some serious HOe action...

 

My holiday last summer has rekindled (together with the additional space) a desire to run the HOm Bemo models on a layout as well. Creating an HOm layout is something I've set out to do twice before in '96 and '06, in both cases it had to be shelved due to a lack of room (despite making ridiculous compromises). Third time lucky perhaps?

 

I picked up a Swiss magazine over the summer in Interlaken (at the wallet emptying shop) and an article in it described a layout built by a professional builder for an English client. This comprised a fiddle yard/reverse loop to reverse loop arrangement with a single intermediate station.

 

As the trains leave the fiddle yard, they climb first up to the station, then using a spiral (part visible) up to the reverse loop. Looks pretty ideal to me....

 

However, I'd like to have more than just one station and I'd like a branch as well! Just to make it even worse, I'd like to have an interchange station as well between the HOe section and the HOm section....

 

Yes, quite a list but as a long term and only project, I would like to think it can be done.

 

So all the talking out of the way, here's the conceptual plan:

 

blogentry-9103-0-71106000-1424014894_thumb.jpg

 

It's even in a U shape to suit the space available!

 

More ramblings soon and my apologies for the lack of pictures!

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Guest Dutch_Master

Posted

May I suggest having a thorough look at the (relative) altitudes of the chosen stations in Google Earth. Pan the view sideways so you can see through the valley. To give you an impression: from the CH/AT border to Pfunds is 5.6 km but already 30m altitude difference. Further up the valley, the gradients will be even steeper. Tunnels for looping the track back-and-forth, like the RhB has done on the Albula and Bernina passes, would have to be employed. It's therefore evident you should at least incorporate some of these loops in your layout. You can, with a 35 or 40cm radius you'll stay below the 3' width you have available.

 

To give you an idea of the terrain, there are cab ride videos on YT for both the RhB (to Tarasp and over the Albula & Bernina passes) and the

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...