Jump to content
 
  • entries
    172
  • comments
    1,475
  • views
    376,643

A show stopper or half baked - the Dapol Stove R?


Silver Sidelines

7,278 views

I have been watching listings for the six wheel Stove R on that well known auction site. I have succumbed and ‘won’ one. From its name I imagined that it was perhaps a train heating van that the LMS had designed for use with the LMS twins.

20106368372_bfcf4dc732_b.jpg

Dapol Stove R in company with Bachmann ex LMS BG

How wrong can you be! A check with Jenkinson and Essery shows that the Stove R was Sir William Stanier’s first design for a ‘Full Brake’. It was a Period III design and appeared in 1932/33. It was a six wheel vehicle– the precursor to the more familiar 50ft BG. The name ‘Stove R’ is because the vans were later fitted with a central stove to keep the guard warm – we can imagine.

 

 

The Dapol model dates from 2010/2011. It was commissioned by Ian Allan Publications and marketed in their periodical, the Hornby Magazine. There is a comprehensive thread on RMweb from the time detailing modellers’ expectations and listing various perceived shortcomings in the model – too many door hinges, too wide, wheels too small – the list seems endless. If I had read this thread earlier I might not have been so keen to purchase said van!

19509682680_32910a6397_b.jpg

Dapol Stove R – underside as received

In my view the biggest problem with the van is that it doesn’t stay on the track. It is a six wheel van and Dapol provided pivoted axles at both ends with a centre axle that can slop around vertically (my words). There is no self centring mechanism provided. Once the pivoted wheels have turned into a corner they can stay stuck in that position and derail at the first opportunity – usually the next turnout.

19075070834_23e60ef884_b.jpg

The outer axles pull off, there is a screw to remove first before removing the centre axle

The outer axles can be pulled straight off the underframe. The centre axle has a clip on cover which hides a set screw which has to be undone before this too can be lifted clear.

19670989786_23aa5ea981_b.jpg

Use of double sided tape

A quick fix is to lock the pivoting axles in the ‘straight on’ position by using a couple of strips of double sided tape.

19697598785_d25fc81ee2_b.jpg

The top of the underframe showing the coupling mechanism

The second issue that I have with the van is the so called close coupling mechanism. Dapol have provided a pivoting coupling mechanism to prevent buffer locking on tight curves (I am guessing ‘train set curves’). In my opinion the mechanism does not however ‘close the gap’ on straight track.

19076686503_b9e8ff24aa_b.jpg

Press here to release the body from the chassis

To ‘get at’ the coupling mechanisms the van body needs to be separated from the chassis.

19671339716_962c28c974_b.jpg

Remove a 2mm long section from the front of the coupling pocket

To bring the couplings inboard I used a snap off blade knife to remove a 2mm section from the front of the coupling pocket which I then refitted it at the rear of the pocket – holding it in place with the prongs of the coupling. If your knife slips and you do not end up with a 2mm section to clip behind the pocket you will need to revert to Plan B and cut a new section off a spare pocket as supplied by Bachmann with their straight couplings.

19671316876_a382cef9d9_b.jpg

Couplings moved ‘inboard’ by 2mm

So far so good! What about the 12mm wheels? Like other modellers I was not happy with the 12mm diameter wheels as supplied and I would fit 14mm size. This requires quite a lot of cutting and filing and in my opinion shouldn’t be necessary for such an expensive little van.

19509470358_5bb01157bd_b.jpg

Mark the centre axle carrier before filing / cutting slot deeper

I scribed a line on the centre axle support as a guide to providing more ‘travel’ for the centre floating axle.

19690348262_4ab34a2617_b.jpg

Drill and form a rectangle with a craft knife

In order to fit 14mm wheels it is necessary to cut away some of the supporting structure for the axle guards. I started by drilling a hole and then using a craft knife to form the necessary rectangular slot. These pictures show just how little of the original material is left.

19510834829_6dcaee7917_b.jpg

The finished centre axle guards, I used a ‘truck tuner’ to form recesses for a standard 26mm pinpoint axle

As supplied by Dapol the centre 12mm wheel set does not have extended axles and relies entirely for support on the centre pillar. I could see no point in cutting the ends off a standard wheel set and instead formed pockets in the plastic axle guards with a ‘truck tuner’. I used a craft knife to elongate these holes to allow some vertical movement.

19509388158_69aa4258cd_b.jpg

The centre wheel set – complete with 14mm diameter wheels

I used a similar procedure for the outer pivoted axles.

19697242665_a30e716950_b.jpg

Outer axle guards – one side complete, the other drilled and ready to be cut out

My plan was to use Hornby 14.1mm wheels – but would these make the ride height too high?

19671813666_2a3b34e23d_b.jpg

Stove R on Hornby 14.1mm wheels with Bachmann Mk1 Suburban

In my opinion the Stove R with Hornby 14.1mm wheels was too high. Did I have any other more suitable wheels?

19893713418_6f0e2dc726_b.jpg

Poor man’s callipers

I don’t possess any engineering callipers – instead I would use an adjustable wrench and a steel rule to measure across the jaws to check different wheel diameters. Yes, the Hornby wheels were 14.1mm as stated. My Jackson turned brass wheels measured 14mm diameter. Bachmann coach wheels measured somewhere between 13.8 and 13.9mm. My Bachmann wheels on a steel axle did not run very freely – maybe the angle on the point was too steep. Instead I used some old split axle sets which have a very narrow pinpoint bearing.

20038086876_c7134f4a89_b.jpg

As currently running with Bachmann ‘14mm’ split axles at either end and a Bachmann steel axle at the centre

The view above shows the current favoured arrangement with split axles at the outer ends and a steel axle in the centre pillar. A word of warning - the underframe detail is all very delicate!

19491973004_597000e4f4_b.jpg

Stove R on Bachmann 14mm Split Axle wheels with Bachmann ex LMS BG

I have attached some views of the Stove R fitted with the Bachmann ‘14mm’ split axle wheels coupled to various coaches.

20056548382_d8f189fb1c_b.jpg

Stove R on Bachmann 14mm Split Axle wheels with Hornby Super Detail Stanier

The biggest height discrepancy comes when the Stove R is coupled to a rake of Bachmann Mk1 Suburbans – who would know which was correct?

20069769121_f87e96745b_b.jpg

Stove R on Bachmann 14mm Split Axle wheels with Bachmann Mk1 Suburbans

Revisiting Jenkinson and Essery gives a prototype height, top of rail to top of roof, of 12ft 4 ¾ inches or 49.6mm in 4mm scale. A rough check of my rewheeled model indicates a height of 50.6mm – an increase of 1mm equivalent to three inches on the prototype. Luckily very few Bachmann or Hornby models can be relied on to be exactly the correct height –so the Stove R is in good company and you just need to be selective as to which wagons and coaches it is coupled up to!

http://youtu.be/1s7xrASTVPA

I am pleased with the final result – well perhaps not final as I still have to sort out the brake shoes. Like so many models from past years the brake shoes are moulded next to the axle guards rather than being placed in line with the wheels. It is a minor discrepancy but one that is proving difficult to correct. Watch this space!

20119902251_0a7898ff9e_b.jpg

Parting shot – Dapol Stove R with Bachmann ex LMS BG

 

Addendum 31 July 2015

 

20148083896_079d51eb80_b.jpg

Buffer height above top of rail - Bachmann 14mm S/A wheels

 

I have added a picture attempting to show the height of the buffer relative to top of rail. According to the comment below from John Tomlinson it should be a touch under 14mm. I shall let you judge - the camera had to be positioned at a slight angle looking down.

  • Like 8

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

Very timely, as I have one of these to put through works this autumn.  Thanks.

Link to comment

Well done but mind the chassis detail - some parts are very delicate (read for that 'break off') just by looking at them.

 

Speak again

 

Ray

Link to comment

What a lot of work for something billed as the bee's knees before it appeared - but it looks like you've got there in the end, and these are very attractive and characterful vehicles!

 

The other test for height is that the buffer centres should be 3ft 5 & a half inches above the top of the rail - a smidge under 14mm for us - and this is quite easy to measure with a 6 inch steel ruler. Twenty odd years ago when Iain Rice wrote the books on wagon construction for Irwell Press he included some splendid pictures of full sized coupled vehicles with a height disparity of roughly the buffer radius, due to worn springs and tyres, which were a timely reminder that all was not perfect on the real railway.

 

John.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

It always struck me that they made a bad design decision during the process.

 

Presumably a lot of the problems have come about because they tried to make it go round train-set curves?  However (unless I'm mistaken) the sales of new ones have always been through controlled channels ie you either had to fill in a form in a magazine, or phone a telephone sales number?  Given that most buyers will be 'modellers' of some description surely all that was needed was to add a note to the printed order forms and modify the script for telesales to make people aware this model will not negotiate curves tighter than --- mm? 

 

People could then make an informed decision whether to buy or not.

Link to comment

Hello Ray,

  Very good article,  will add it to my favourites for later reference - I also have one of these, ordered it from an advert in "Railway Modeller", and as you say it's a shame they got it so wrong.

I needed one for a  'milk brake' on my layout, the main industry being a rail connected creamery, with all the tanker traffic that entails.

So I reckon I will have to have a serious think about trying to copy your mods, just got to be careful...and source the replacement wheelsets.

Regards,

SIGTECH

(Steve).

Link to comment

Thanks John

..The other test for height is that the buffer centres should be 3ft 5 & a half inches above the top of the rail - a smidge under 14mm for us - and this is quite easy to measure with a 6 inch steel ruler. Twenty odd years ago when Iain Rice wrote the books on wagon construction for Irwell Press he included some splendid pictures of full sized coupled vehicles with a height disparity of roughly the buffer radius, due to worn springs and tyres, which were a timely reminder that all was not perfect on the real railway....

This I didn't know but might have guessed.  3 inches - 6 inches puts things into perspective.

 

Thanks for the input

 

Regards

 

Ray

Link to comment

Hi MTL

 

You could be right.

 

..Presumably a lot of the problems have come about because they tried to make it go round train-set curves?  However (unless I'm mistaken) the sales of new ones have always been through controlled channels ie you either had to fill in a form in a magazine, or phone a telephone sales number?  Given that most buyers will be 'modellers' of some description surely all that was needed was to add a note to the printed order forms and modify the script for telesales to make people aware this model will not negotiate curves tighter than --- mm? 

...

I guess they thought they were doing the right thing.  I just think they tried too hard.

 

Ray

Link to comment

Hi Steve

 

Thanks for the interest.

.I needed one for a  'milk brake' on my layout, the main industry being a rail connected creamery, with all the tanker traffic that entails.

So I reckon I will have to have a serious think about trying to copy your mods, just got to be careful...and source the replacement wheelsets.

..

Yes -the Stove would look great on a wee milk train.  The ride height should not be a problem when paired with tank wagons - no roof line to match up.

 

I carried out all my modifications without doing any damage to the underframe.  Then - I would take the couplings off again and I broke one of the steps.  The model really is quite delicate.

 

Speak again

 

Ray

Link to comment

Hello John (again)

..The other test for height is that the buffer centres should be 3ft 5 & a half inches above the top of the rail - a smidge under 14mm for us - and this is quite easy to measure with a 6 inch steel ruler...

I have added another picture to the Blog which shows that the buffer height with the Bachmann 14mm S/A wheels is in range.

 

Thanks

 

Ray

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...