Jump to content
 
  • entries
    3
  • comments
    13
  • views
    798

LNER/BR Point Rodding


Biged4412

319 views

Hi all

 

Im currently working on my model of a branch line station in East/North Yorkshire and i have got to a stage which has stumped me, Regarding the point rodding.

 

I have spent ages scouring the internet and books i own looking for pictures and products etc but have come up very short. I have found that most if not all NER point rodding was rounded, i do intended to scratch build but i am looking for some of the main components such as pulleys etc, i have looked on wizard models but to little luck as most seems to be unsuitable.

 

Does anybody know of any reference material or any products which are available out there to me with this problem.

 

any help would be much appreciated.

 

thanks in adavance

 

Ed

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Might be better posting this question in the Skills and Knowledge PW and infrastructure section of the main forum as it will attract a larger readership than here in the blogs.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Well, my first port of call would be the NER association. 

 

The other question would be when? Signalling and rodding changed, but if round point rodding is right for your period the MSE parts look ok. 

Link to comment

Hi Ed,

 

A lot of ground work signalling installations on the North Eastern Railway was contracted to McKenzie & Holland Co Ltd of Worcester who supplied the Type 17a slide tappet lever frames and many signal cabins were also to McKenzie specification. The point rodding I think you will find was 1 3/4" diameter round rodding which ran on stools set at 6' intervals, the rod stools were fitted with two curved rollers set in a frame for the rods to pass through, some rodding which pulled heavy points were solid bar whilst other rods which pulled lighter equipment such as FPL's and fouling bars were very often hollow tube. I think you will find the cranks had a 10inch throw whereas LNER / BR replacements had 12inch throws. The McKenzie point cranks had a much thinner centre boss than later replacement equipment, this was because the early post 1872 round rod installations were only pulling point blades of 85lb per yard weight whereas LNER rail was 95lb or 97lb RBS bullhead section which required the much stronger galvanized channel section. The downside with round tube rodding was it had to be painted to avoid corrosion which inevitably cause rot from the hollow insides and at screw connecting joints which weakened the integrity of such installations .

Hope this helps.

Paul

Link to comment

Hi All thank you for your replies and in answer to your Dave john is my layouts based around 1956 and is based on settington on the MDR branchline and from the photo I can find it seems to be round ill see if I can upload the image.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...