Jump to content
RMweb
 

Paynestown - buildings and sub-structure


Barry Ten

609 views

Over the last couple of weeks, I've been building some of the Ratio kits which form the main railway buildings of the layout. As my first venture into scenery in UK N, I quite enjoyed getting to grips with these.

 

First up is the goods shed, which is where the engine shed used to be on the old layout:

 

P1140409.JPG.bcd12a241042f5e106f44f3400c9e34d.JPG

 

 

P1140402.JPG.da28fbf5778842d3c9eb734ba4d19aec.JPG

 

In keeping with the other buildings, and the original layout, I've opted for GWR colours of light and dark stone, rather than WR brown and cream, the idea being that not only has this station not had a lick of paint since before the war (or they're still using up local stocks!)  but that I could run some pre-nationalisation models if so desired.  This isn't too fanciful as some GWR backwaters did retain traces of the older colours right until closure.

 

I also constructed the GWR signal box:

 

P1140408.JPG.10390d318c551a5e4bb264e857066fde.JPG

 

P1140411.JPG.84d5c830d15ff21b3d5aa75a4ee5fe16.JPG

 

This is arguably a bit on the large side (the 4mm one was the much smaller Highley-style box) but I'll just pretend that it controls more than just the visible track - perhaps there's a junction or set of sidings just off-scene. Another enjoyable kit but I found the instructions a bit skimpy. The etched windows are a nice touch, though. I sawed off the enormous chunky base that the model is supposed to be mounted on.

 

P1140403.JPG.f9ff4805463e010ade166e6c29628dbc.JPG

 

In addition, and taking in a view of the layout as a whole, now mounted on a rather rakishly curved sheet of extruded foam:

 

P1140407.JPG.909718b87d7862c77e34eb54c3fcf8c5.JPG

 

I also made the carriage shed, and I've made a start on the station building to get a feel for how it all fits together.

 

This view also shows a test-fitting of the backscene. I've cut recesses in it which will allow the operator to work the points and uncoupling

magnets,  but once finished, the rear scenery will rise up to box these in from the front, with a stone-built retaining wall and steeply sloping hillside. I've opted for a relatively high backscene by N standards (about 12 inches in total) which I hope will help place the models the context of the landscape.

 

P1140406.JPG.8cae3e4846b8d15f09d2c72d735ed3c5.JPG

 

One thing that's maybe worth a mention is that there'll be no backscene on the right-side end of the layout, affording a view along the scene, as well as it into it. There'll also be no "proscenium arch" as such - just a dainty lighting support cantilevered off the backscene. The idea is to break away a bit from the New Layout Design Orthodoxy (NLDO) of a high vantage, wings, arch etc, as popularised by Iain Rice et all and which has understandably become the norm. It's popular because it works, and is very effective at framing a scene and constraining viewing angles, but with this one, I want the layout to be viewable from a range of angles and elevations, yet still be well-lit and appear "finished" to a decent standard. To this end, the intention is that it'll be operated from a tabletop (so no trestles or legs needing transport) and be equally suited to viewing from a seated or standing position. I think this works in a valleys context because in reality you could be at almost any given elevation in relation to the scene, so it won't look "wrong" to be looking up, down or sideways! Anyway we'll see, it could all crash and burn!

 

 

 

  • Like 13

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

Hi Al, it’s all looking good!…..looking at the box, could you cut it and shut the pieces back to make a smaller box with just one double set of downstairs windows?

Edited by BlackRat
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Neil, yes I think that would be possible - probably a bit too much butchery to inflict on the box as built, but definitely something to think about in the future.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Did you consider cutting the signal box down by a window bay? One of the possible pluses of GWR quasi-modular design when it comes to kit-bashing buildings.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I like that you're rethinking the framing / viewing angles in line with the context within which the scene exists - got me thinking 🤔

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

I don't think that NLDO, cameo or trainset in a box works for all layouts. While a constrained view can work well for urban layouts I take the view that the claustrophobic air it gives fights against a sense of open space which rural and in this case a valley setting needs. Even boxing in might work with the layout I'd be in favour of plenty of sky rather than the tank drivers view usually given in a cased presentation.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, Neil said:

I don't think that NLDO, cameo or trainset in a box works for all layouts. While a constrained view can work well for urban layouts I take the view that the claustrophobic air it gives fights against a sense of open space which rural and in this case a valley setting needs. Even boxing in might work with the layout I'd be in favour of plenty of sky rather than the tank drivers view usually given in a cased presentation.

 

My thinking is heavily influenced by a really good layout I saw once ... Shell something? 😄

  • Like 1
  • Funny 1
Link to comment

A layout set into the existing landscape, I love it, look forward to seeing the progression.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
6 hours ago, Captain Kernow said:

 

 

Sorry, just realised you're doing this in 'N'! Such is the quality of the work, you had me fooled!

 

 

I'll take that as a win!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...