Jump to content
 
  • entries
    14
  • comments
    101
  • views
    27,707

Loose Ends: the Bridge


buffalo

1,144 views

Although baseboard construction for Nowhere has been progressing rapidly, I've managed some progress on the embankment, bridge and station yard modules for Loose Ends. The basic form of the bridge module is now complete with the bridge itself, the river banks and the stone piers in place. Though I've yet to consider the river water or the backscene, and a central pier is yet to be built, possibly with Brunellian cylindrical supports. I'm still experimenting with different ways of painting the stonework to try to represent something like Bath or Cotswold stone. I'm not there yet, but its much closer than my first attempts. Meanwhile, the track components have arrived and I've started laying track on the embankment and bridge.

 

blogentry-6746-12659122819992_thumb.jpg

 

At this point, I have to reveal a hitherto closely guarded secret about Loose Ends. It is to have GWR mixed gauge track so that I can run both narrow and broad gauge stock. At the moment, the latter is limited to a single, almost complete, tilt wagon shown in the photos, but I have several BGS kits sitting at the end of the bench awaiting my attention.

 

In line with my intention to use Loose Ends as a way of experimenting with different modelling techniques, I am trying two different methods of track construction. The rail is BGS bridge rail and is being laid on timber baulks on the embankment and copper clad on the bridge and into the station yard. On the timber baulks, the rail is soldered to brass pins which pass through the baulks. So far, this method seems a bit more fiddly, though this is probably made worse by the need to level the baulk surface by sanding and with packing pieces because the surface of the underlying cork is aomewhat undulating

 

blogentry-6746-12659122901781_thumb.jpg

 

Bearing in mind that Loose Ends is intended to sit on a shelf near eye level and that one of its purposes is to give me somewhere to photograph stock, I'm hoping that the nature of the track will only be apparent when viewed from above. It should be quite possible to photograph my Edwardian and later stock from a lower angle without it being apparent that they are sitting on track that should have been lifted at least 10-12 years earlier. If not, then we'll just have to invent a fiction that the broad gauge survived a little longer in this alternative universe unsure.gif There will be very little pointwork and all of it will be on modules that could be removed from the layout, leaving a simple traverser at each end. Standard gauge EM stock should therefore run happily on the P4 gauge rails as they will not have any flangeway gaps to deal with.

 

By the way, I'm surprised that no one has yet managed to identify the prototype for the bridge cattle creep on the embankment section. My wife (who knows her architecture) recognised it straight away!

  • Like 2

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

Aha, all is revealed! :icon_clap: That's an interesting development with the mixed gauge Nick, and thanks for showing the BG track construction options, which have always seemed a bit mystical to me as BG layouts tend to show only the finished result. I wonder what type and dimensions of wood you are using for the timber baulks?

 

Looks like a decent sized river, very impressive, as is the bridge. Sounds good that you're getting somewhere with Nowhere :)

Link to comment

There probably are several other ways of doing it, of which the most realistic might be to drill and spike the flanges of the bridge rail with fine brass wire :blink:

 

The copper-clad baulks are the standard BGS offering, but the timber is from Exactoscale (via Wizard Models). It is, in fact, their 14 inch turnout timbering which is sold in packs of 50 pieces, 375mm long. As with their other wooden timbers, it is 1.6mm three-ply. I haven't made up my mind what to use for the transoms yet.

 

More on Nowhere, where tracklaying has also begun, when I get a chance to photograph the latest state -- maybe at the weekend.

Link to comment

Close, Miss P. I hope I haven't confused you by suggesting that the girder bridge has a real prototype. A slip of the fingers in this entry referred to 'the bridge' whereas the question about the prototype in a previous entry was really about the cattle creep or farm access tunnel beneath the embankment. The original is near Bath and the clue is in the gothic arches that Brunel adopted for a particular stretch of the main line.

 

As to the girder bridge, that doesn't have a single prototype but is more inspired by an amalgam of originals in the Bath area, though mostly on the Midland rather than GWR line. The closest prototype for the general layout of bridge, river and station is really Green Park, though that bridge was (and part of it still is) a lattice girder. Of course, it never carried broad gauge, though I have been tempted by the RMweb tradition of rewriting Somerset & Dorset history by invoking the original Somerset Central broad gauge... :blink:

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...