Jump to content
 
  • entries
    58
  • comments
    340
  • views
    24,744

Summer module - new thoughts


Barry Ten

576 views

With the glorious weather we've been having, it seems only fitting that progress on my S&D layout finally reaches the "summer" module. And now that I'm finally forced to make certain critical decisions, it's become clear that I'm no longer even pretending that this is Shillingstone, or even an attempt at "essence" thereof. I'd already made major compromises with the track layout, but the clincher has been the need to disguise the entry and exit points of the track through the backscene. I've used view blocks on the other modules, but only for single track. Here we've got three tracks entering the scene on the left, which means a big cut-out in the backscene, which you're almost looking straight into when viewing things from the extreme right. An overbridge, though a bit of a modelling cliche, seemed the best solution. There is no similar structure near Shillingstone, though.

 

On the other side of the module, some experimentation showed that I could still get away with a view-block, which meant a level crossing was a possibility ... and I like level crossings, so we'll have one there. But by the time I'd worked this out, I'd become concerned about the cramped nature of the goods yard, situated on the same side of the tracks as the main station building, signal box etc. The solution, obviously enough, was to flip the station onto the other side of the tracks, and thereby free up most of the frontage of the layout for some longer, less cluttered sidings. Pros and cons, as ever - I like the roadside approach to stations, but the rear elevation of Shillingstone isn't (in my view) particularly characterful. And, of course, I do like the idea of using Bachmann's forthcoming range of models - with whatever tweaking is necessary or feasible to bring out the best of them. Now we get the front view of the station and signal box.

 

An idea I was tinkering with for about as long as I've been building this layout is some kind of dairy or factory serviced by a siding or two. But as always less is more, and I've now binned that one, tempting as it was.

 

So what we've got is a model which now preserves the correct orientation of track curvature with respect to Shillingstone, but which has the goods facilities much simplified and on the "wrong" side of the tracks. With that in mind, the module has become a representation of a fictitious Dorset station which mingles a bit of this and a bit of that, hopefully to pleasing and uncluttered effect. Importantly, the track, which has been down and running for three years, remains untouched - if it ain't broke, etc. A large area is still "TBD" - it could include a pond, a representation of a bend in the River Stour, or a small village scene. In the meantime I've begun putting in the very long continuous backscene - pics to follow in a day or two, I hope.

 

blogentry-6720-0-33799100-1342041072_thumb.jpg

 

Cheers and thanks for reading.

  • Like 6

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

With the glorious weather we've been having, it seems only fitting that progress on my S&D layout finally reaches the "summer" module

 

So you're going to lay the track and pour on four or five gallons of varnish? ;)

 

As an aid to drawing the eye away from lingering looking views through the overbridge, could a PW hut be sited at the top of he rising ground by the toe of the back-to-back turnouts (or is is a slip?). I like the idea of the backscene curving around itself towards the front on the RHS and acting as part of the view block.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Al, This is looking really good. Personally I prefer modelling a fictitious station and like the freedom it gives. A composite station built using select "choice cuts" from a variety of stations along a line, gives the model credibility. This is certainly the approach I'll be using on my 7mm project.

I particularly like the staggered platforms, not something you see modelled very often.

Dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Buckjumper - it's a good idea about drawing the eye, I'll have a better idea of the available real estate shortly. Should be room for a small hut. And yes, those are two back to back turnouts although a slip would have been a better space-saver in hindsight.

 

Dave: I think Sturminster Newton was the only staggered platform station on the S&D but there may have been another one. If you're familiar with the prototype, you'll know of the unusual dropped section of platform which allowed passengers to walk across to the end of the other platform.

Link to comment

Al, hows about a signal box, with the rear going down say 'three floors', a bit like Okehampton.

 

The rising ground could be reasonably steep and the building would add a little height plus interest taking you away from the over bridge?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Al, with regards to the view through the overbridge, would you be in a position to model a bit of embankment on the other (non-scenic) side of the bridge, so that you're not looking through the bridge at bare boards?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hmm - my last attempt to reply vanished, but yes, thanks chaps, for the useful suggestions. I like that signalbox, Neil - just Googled it. CK - yes, it's no problem to extend the scenery, at least at the level of the trackbed or higher.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Noticed last night that this simplified track layout is virtually identical to that of Barry Norman's Petherick, even down to the two back to back points in the yard, rather than a double slip. Good enough for Barry N, good enough for Barry Ten, I say.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...