Jump to content
 
  • entries
    11
  • comments
    103
  • views
    15,284

Progress - sort of ...


Gingerbread

1,476 views

It's now about 9 months since my initial blog entry, describing plans for a 2mm reconstruction of Market Drayton (on the Wellington to Crewe GWR line) around 1905, and nothing has been reported since then.

 

Broadly work has fallen into two categories - armchair modelling (research and planning), and building some of the rolling stock that I want for the layout.

 

On the planning side I now have track plans and drawings of the buildings at various dates, so that I can interpolate and produce something fairly plausible for the date range that I want to model (probably 1900-1910). Unfortunately the line was closed in the 1960s, so there are few colour photographs, leaving me with plenty of unanswered questions. If I don't manage to find any better references, I will rely on notes I took from studying a colour photograph of Winchester Chesil, built in the same "French Renaissance" style, which used a mixture of red and blue bricks. Kidderminster station, on the Severn Valley Railway, is built in the same style, and seems to use the same pattern of red/blue bricks.

 

The complete station is rather too extensive for a first project, so I am tempted to follow Mikkel's example with the Farthing Layouts, and start with a small portion of it (the main platforms, and a couple of adjacent loops/sidings), the rest being conveniently "off-scene". Not only will this save space, it will reduce the number of sets of points required (probably to about one) :).

 

I have also been looking at some of the available "alternative histories", where different lines had been built nearby, resulting in different patterns of traffic. This would allow me to justify running it with purely GWR traffic, rather than the mixture of GWR and North Staffs Railway ("Knotty") traffic that actually existed. For example, there was a proposal for a Wellington to Drayton line extending to the western side of the Potteries at Wolstanton, which would have become a GWR subsidiary and might have dissuaded the Knotty from building their Stoke-Drayton line. This wasn't approved, and the Wellington to Drayton line was subsequently built without the Wolstanton extension. There were several proposals for the Potteries, Shrewsbury and North Wales line, which would have run through Market Drayton, but it wasn't approved until too late (1918?) and only about half a mile of it was built before funds ran out. It seems quite plausible that one of these proposals could have succeeded, but run into financial difficulties and been taken over by the GWR. Apart from eliminating the problem of building Knotty stock, these options provide justification for running different rolling stock through the existing Market Drayton station - GWR branch line passenger train behind a '517, mineral traffic such as limestone from North Wales to the Potteries iron industry and china clay from Cornwall for the pottery industry.

 

Switching back from other alternative histories to this one, I have been looking at the GWR main line freight traffic. Based on a timetable from 1898, there were five northbound freights from Worcester which passed through Market Drayton each night, with the corresponding returns passing through southbound, also overnight. Although either unspecified or described as "vegetable", I think they would actually have been carrying fruit, and would therefore have been seasonal. The second batch of GWR fruit vans, the Y1s, were being built around my proposed date for the layout, so there would have been somewhere between 120 and 220 fruit vans available. Assuming that approximately 1/3 of the fruit traffic passed along this line, with the remainder going south and eastwards to Birmingham, London, Bristol, South Wales, etc, this means that 40 to 80 vans would be used, split between 10 trains. That makes the trains rather easy to model, but I am not convinced that a 4-van express freight is very plausible, so I assume that other vehicles would be added if needed, such as siphons or cattle wagons. I am also trying to find out what locomotives were used on such trains - I've seen suggestions that it would be Dean Goods, or that it would be one of the various 4-4-0 passenger locomotives. Fortunately the fruit vans should be quite easy to make - Richard Brummitt has made available a basic etch for the chassis (16 feet long, 10 ft wheelbase, coach wheels, 8 brake blocks) and the Association Mink is close in appearance to the Y2 fruit vans (though it is unclear from Atkins et al whether the sides were solid or louvred). Livery is still to be determined, as the red/grey question is unclear and under active discussion in a thread elsewhere on RMweb. Similarly coupling method undecided - I know Richard is a 3-link supporter, and therefore doesn't make the usual provision of DG couplings on his chassis etch, so I am currently proposing having a rake of 6 (or however many I finish up producing) with internal coupling using 3-link and DGs on the ends to attach to whatever other vehicles form the train.

 

I believe there was also one meat train per day from Birkenhead to Smithfield, though I can't identify it on the timetable. Similar situation for the composition and livery of this train, probably with X1 non-refrigerated Micas (possibly the N gauge Society bodies on more of Richard Brummitt's chassis) for the vans, but in what livery and behind what locomotive...?

 

There's a couple of northbound broccoli trains, which pass through Market Drayton in late afternoon/evening - I assume these would probably have originated in Cornwall, or perhaps in the Vale of Evesham. I only see one return train - not sure if there is another not shown in the timetable, or whether the stock was combined for the return.

 

There was a late night train carrying potatoes from Market Drayton (9.45 pm) to Wellington (10.30 pm) for onwards conveyance to South Wales - this was worked by locomotive from the passenger train from Crewe (8.10 pm) to Market Drayton (8.30 pm), which indicates that at least in this instance a passenger engine was used, though this may have been a convenience to work the engine back to the Wellington shed.

 

Cattle traffic on the line appears odd. According to the 1898 timetable, on Monday a cattle train heads north from Market Drayton to Crewe (I think the Crewe cattle auction was on Mondays), leaving at 8.30 am and arriving at 9.30 am. There is also a somewhat ambiguous entry suggesting that a similar Mondays-only train runs south from Crewe at 7.30 am, arriving at Market Drayton at 8.30 am, and continues southward to Wellington, and perhaps onwards to Victoria Basin, Wolverhampton. It's not clear what those cattle wagons are going to do for the rest of the week, or how they get back to their starting position (Easiest assumption would be that the wagons are worked back empty from Wellington/Wolverhampton to Market Drayton, but that means that they spend the rest of the week idle. Perhaps that is just the default position, if nothing more profitable comes up during the week).

 

As far as stock-building goes, I now have lots of part-finished wagons (so nothing ready to reveal here). Main reason/excuse is livery - I don't think there are any transfers available for my period, which involves 6 inch lettering on the older wagons, some of which would be on cast plates, and 25 inch lettering with 6 inch numbering on the newer (and repainted) ones. I think standard GWR lettering is 16 inch, so perhaps combining 3mm sheets for "G" and "W" with 2mm/N sheets for the numbering might solve the problem for the newer wagons. I also have some white "print-your-own" transfer paper, but will need to match colours suitably for the red/grey background when I try these. What I propose to try first is a couple of wagons with cast plates, which I should be able to print myself in black and white onto paper, then glue onto the wagons (though at less than one mm high, I am not sure how legible it's going to be at normal viewing distance).

 

Another interesting challenge has been putting DC brake levers onto the wagon chassis - the hole in the lever is considerably smaller than the wire it is supposed to fit onto, and enlarging the hole offered a challenge, as I couldn't find anything to fit into the hole to open it out. Advice from Noel Leaver on the VAG led me to a smaller set of cutting broaches, the smallest of which can be used to open out the hole (though the size of the lever is not much wider than the wire, so it is easy to get carried away with enthusiasm and finish up with a lack of metal around the hole...). At least I now have a couple of levers soldered in place now, and a substantial batch reamed out and ready to fit when I switch back to more modern stock.

 

A further sticking point is the "hybar" tarpaulin support system. I have bought six etches for my five-plank opens, but pictures of the GWR version and of the association etch don't look quite the same, so those have been put onto one side until inspiration strikes and I can see how to finish them. A possible solution is to stick tarpaulins onto some loaded wagons, with or without a supporting rail, which brings me to the next problem - I've not bought any tarpaulin sheets yet, and haven't found enough details of the markings to make my own (nor do I have the required cigarette paper to hand either ...).

 

Another interesting project "in-progress" is the footbridge. As is widely known, GWR footbridges were of two designs, with sides either of solid plate girders or of open latticework. However, Market Drayton, according to all the pictures I have seen, did both - with latticework outside solid plate sides... See http://www.the-ginge...ionphoto002.gif for a picture from about the right period, with http://www.the-ginge...ionphoto051.gif probably showing the situation after the line was closed to passengers, awaiting completion of the dismantling. I have therefore obtained from Worsley Works a "latticework" style footbridge, which is a 2mm etch reduced from 3mm, and based on Radley, and started assembling that. Unfortunately the etch appears to have some of the diagonals running the wrong way, so it needed to have two parts snipped off and turned round, then soldered together. That has been painted dark/light stone, and glued to a thin layer of plasticard (painted in light stone) which now looks good for the bridge sides (apart from overgenerous glue application, but perhaps a bit of enthusiastic weathering will hide that...). Next come the floor, steps, roof, pillars etc...

 

The one part of my building project which is close to being photo-worthy is a small selection of PO wagons. Whilst this line did not have the heavy mineral traffic seen on most GWR main lines, there was of course some limited local traffic to the coal merchants in the station itself. One of my source books has an excellent illustration of one such wagon - a 4 plank wagon dated 1904, lettered for one "S. Woodcock", coal merchant of Market Drayton. I am a bit sceptical about four plank wagons at that date, but the photograph suggests that the wagon was built as such in 1904, and it does have the advantage of less planking to draw/scribe, and no diagonal strapping. Unfortunately the photograph is monochrome, but I have been informed that most PO wagons were either black or red lead, and it's clearly not black, so it must be red. I decided to experiment with card sides, with printed paper overlays from my inkjet printer (using Inkscape, which I have been recommending to colleagues, without actually using it much myself, so here was a chance to remedy that). One unanticipated advantage of the method is that the sides acquired their own mild weathering during the construction - I assume that the ink, being somewhat water-soluble, ran and discoloured slightly when glue was applied to the paper. For the chassis I used the Association 8 ft 6 in RCH version (2-326), but I used small blocks of plasticard to represent grease axleboxes rather than folding up the etched ones, which I think represent oil ones.

 

blogentry-10888-0-06651800-1322419629_thumb.jpg

 

The initial model had two main problems - the dimensions were slightly too large, and it bowed out noticeably along the sides, so I moved on to version two (for which I found the name of another coal merchant headquartered nearby, with a branch office in Market Drayton, and re-worded the painting on the wagon to suit, at least in my imagination). I used plasticard instead of cardboard, which fixed the bowing problem, and changed the design slightly to create the buffer beam as an integral part of the end of the wagon, rather than the chassis, which avoids the length problem. The remaining minor annoyance is that I have difficulty getting the paper to lie square at the corners, it tends to be too rounded, so the next iteration will have a slightly different design - instead of paper sides and ends being a single piece, I will have separate paper sides and ends, not worrying too much about the actual joint, then overlay a short strip of L-shaped plastic moulding to create the corner piece (rather than painting or printing it onto the sides directly).

  • Like 2

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

Having seen these waggons bodies in the flesh i can vouch for how good they look the weathering effect is mutted but tastefull

Link to comment

David,

 

The brake levers are so fragile once opened up I tend to break them before I fit them over the wire. I've given up trying and now chop the hole off. The remaining lever is soldered to the hanger bracket in the right place and the wire cut flush. You really don't notice this short cut.

 

Strictly speaking my 'screw link' coupling representations only have two links ;-D I'm still working on how to make an instanter link. Feel free to add some thickness of brass/plasticard under the chassis to mount DGs or any other type. I have nothing against them, but they are not for me.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Real wagons tended to bow outwards with the weight of the coal so a little bowing would be acceptable.

The tarpaulin bars could hinge down for loading so if not sheeted could be modelled down. If modelled sheeted then a piece of plasticard or similar could provide a more rigid support.

The two wagons have come out well.

Don

Link to comment

Thanks for the comments.

 

Nigel -

You saw them in the rather subdued lighting of the West London Area Group, which served to hide most of the flaws. I'm quite pleased with the photo above, which shows the lettering is legible (though a little out-of-focus for the right hand wagon).

 

Richard -

I remember that when I tried soldering the DC levers directly they fell off rather quickly - I suspect that I probably didn't cut the wire flush, and my soldering skills weren't up to the task. Next time one breaks I will try your suggestion instead.

Instanter couplings were introduced about 1908, so I don't think I need to worry about them for my wagons. Still procrastinating on a decision whether to try 3-link for my fruit and mica rakes - the fact that you haven't provided the standard mounting for DGs means the additional work for 3-links would be less than otherwise, and those rakes of wagons would stay together, and never be shunted in the station. Watched one of my colleagues at the Wealden Area Group experimenting making some 3-links recently, and await the news of success (or otherwise) at the next meeting.

 

Don -

Yes, a load of coal in the slightly bowed cardboard version sounds like a good idea - it would also cover the lack of scribed or printed planking on the interior of that wagon.

The Association Hybar kit is supposed to be movable, but your suggestion of using it in the "down" position for unsheeted open wagons, but leaving it off the sheeted ones (and using a piece of plasticard to substitute for it in the "up" position) sounds like the way to go. So next I need to buy or make some tarpaulin sheets ....

 

David

Link to comment

I solder them along the non-upright portion of the hanger if that makes sense. There should be enough material before they bend out around the solebar to sweat them on with flat surface contact. Hope that makes sense.

 

The time consuming parts of 3 link coupling manufacture are cursing profusely as they ping out of the tweezers during assembly, second only to cutting them into individual pieces from the wound wire. One day when I have learnt how to accurately fix and adjust them I will probably use AJs.

 

I came to the same conclusion with the association hybar kit: that it doesn't closely resemble our prototype. Maybe I am mistaken? (Readers please note that it does not claim to resemble our prototype). See here for how I made my wagon tarpaulins. Somewhere I should have the file I used, which will be perfect for your first one. You'll have to figure out a way to change the numbers for any subsequent ones. (and share the secret. ;-) ) There is all the information I think you would need in the recent edition of GWW on wagon tarpaulin styles and dates, if you don't have the info already.

Link to comment

David, it's good to see your progress not just with planning the layout which I am coming to find is almost as fun as building it but also the wagons look good. I might have a solution to decals which we can discuss at new AG..

Tom

Link to comment

Richard -

Yes, I think I follow your explanation of DC brake lever attachment.

 

Only one set of links escaped to the floor during assembly when watching the trial, and that was recovered fairly quickly - I fear it will be worse when I try it.

 

I had already seen your blog article on GWR tarpaulins, and also found some useful information at http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/gansg/9-loads/9-tarps.htm - checking against RWA seems to confirm that the pattern shown there as post-grouping was also used for earlier GWR tarpaulins, around 1900. Must get myself a copy of GWW - I hadn't realised they were covered there. I look forward to receiving your file - can you remember what format it was? It shouldn't be too difficult to re-number.

 

Tom -

Yes, I find research and planning just as much fun as building.

 

Nigel also mentioned at the last meeting that his new printer should be able to print white, but he hasn't yet persuaded it to do so.

 

This initial attempt suggests it should be possible to print the numbers for wagons, which are just slightly smaller than the lower rows of text on the PO wagons, using some variation of this system. Cast plates, printing black background around white numbers onto plain paper, looks like the easiest to try first. It's not entirely clear what period used this style - probably something like 1897 to 1904, which should straddle the red to grey livery switch (assuming that was about 1898).

 

David

Link to comment

I don't think tarpaulins were covered until the recent new edition. They are certainly not in the older edition I have with a green coloured cover and the entwined monogram.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...