Jump to content
 
  • entries
    297
  • comments
    368
  • views
    83,954

"City of Lincoln", Part II


James Harrison

247 views

It may seem like things have gone very quiet but I have been busy (honest)!

 

There just hasn't been any progress really worthwhile talking about yet...

 

So when I last wrote about 'City of Lincoln', I had just broken the model down to it a number of subassemblies (body, chassis and tender) and was about to put the lot into paint stripper.

 

After a few days sitting in white spirit I was able to remove the vast majority of the original paint finish; I found two variations of GCR livery and three of LNER, plus two coats of grey primer below all of that.... no wonder the paintwork looked a little thick!

 

Once it was all cleaned off and dried out, I repainted the model in GCR green livery. Firstly a coat of grey primer, then two coats of Humbrol gloss Brunswick green enamel and two coats of Humbrol matt Brunswick green acrylic. The dark brown/ crimson splashers are Humbrol no.73 enamel, over a coat of Humbrol satin mid-brown.

 

Now came the puzzler! Coming to put it all back together, I found that the body didn't want to go squarely back on the chassis. Then I found that the loco chassis didn't have any pickups fitted- hence the obtrusive wire back into the tender, where the pickups lived (what an odd set-up). I decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to re-chassis the loco, and picked up a Hornby RailRoad Patriot chassis- the wheel spacings and sizes are pretty much a dead match for the Sam Fays. I then had to remove a large amount of material from the underside and inside of the boiler to get it to fit right, but managed it eventually.

 

So, as of tonight, this is what I have...

 

IMG_20150916_182406204_zpspvztokvb.jpg

  • Like 3

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Not really; it is one of those more modern sprung screw affairs rather than a linking bar.  There might be a way around it; but as the position of the bogie doesn't jump out at me as being wrong I'm happy to leave it as it is, for the moment at least. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...