It is ridiculous to have to run the same types together due to the problems mentioned above. Does anybody realize out there that this is unacceptable? Don't buy them if they don't conform. How come continental HO nem heights are correct. I have never had so much frustration as I have had trying to go back to British OO. I am talking about run of the mill ordinary blokes here that don't "cut and shut", "respray" etc. IMHO it is ridiculous to have to go to these lengths after spending so much on models. Continental HO is NOT expensive as they need no alterations!!!!
I know about size of markets etc but i think that this day and age the faults on the MK2e are appalling. No close coupling, colour wrong, lining wrong, lightbar too short, buckeye that is in wrong position (sorry that was a mk1 fault), door window too wide.
If I were producing a model I would at least have it height tested against all the vehicles from all manufacturers that it would be likely to be coupled to as well as my own. Bachmann's mk1 - mk2 heights in OO and N are incorrect. As for buffers and couplings. There are standards????? Has anybody taken a Bachmann mk1 back to the shop and said " the coupling cannot be called NEM as it is the wrong height"? I cannot come back to British OO as it is still "faulty and jerry built". (Fairwell) I have calmed down since but I am not going to model blue grey era any more. Maroon, green and chocolate/cream.