Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

30 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Download it from here https://www.telford.gov.uk/downloads/file/10178/granville_heritage_trail_leaflet Walked part of it on Sunday - some informative boards along the way.
  2. Sorry to be a bit tardy on this - just catching up on this thread. I think those lamps are LMS loco lamps and my memory suggests that only 5428 and 4767 carried this style of lamp. They were significantly different to the LNER style that most other NYMR locos carried. But it was a long time ago.. Stuart
  3. From the summer 1954 Carriage Working Book, the basic sets were BT-CL-BT or BT-CL-T-BT with a further T as a timetabled strengthener during July, August and early September. DMUs from 1958? I think I have a 1930's carriage working book somewhere, I'll have a look for it but I doubt they'll be much different. Both books are from NERA http://www.ner.org.uk/assets/NERA Book & Publications - Combined List 22nd March 2019.pdf
  4. A 158 was on the 1020 ex Middlesbrough/1158 ex Whitby on Friday 26 July. It looked well filled and there were plenty of people waiting to join at Whitby .
  5. After 43 years of working with them, I would say that you do have to treat Ordnance Survey maps with a degree of caution. That statement isn’t intended to denigrate the OS, either body or the surveyors, a number of whom I have counted as friends or former colleagues, but I do think you need a certain amount of knowledge to interpret what you see. Firstly, the Ordnance Survey map is a topographical map, it is intended to show physical features – it is not, and never was, intended to show property boundaries (s12 Ordnance Survey Act 1841). It does, of course, show physical features w
  6. My memories are 1967 onwards (I can just remember my mother buying me a ticket at Lealholm station and putting me on a green DMU to be picked up by Father in Middlesbrough). The dated services I remember would have been 1740-ish to Newcastle and 2109 SO Middlesbrough, both of which were limited stop after Grosmont. On Sundays, there was quite a gap between the last arrival and first departure of the three trains so the shortest might have gone into 4 (no carriage sidings at Bog Hall by then). That second photo in your post is the scene I was trying to envisage in my mind (having walked down
  7. I remember those signals as well, they were both ‘planted’ in No.1 platform. No.20 being almost in the middle (width-wise) As to platforms 3 and 4, there was a restriction on Mark 1 coaches using those platforms – you couldn’t put Mark 1s into either if the other was occupied. I guess they were OK for 57ft stock. This from BR Standard Coaching Stock restrictions (1961) Whitby Station. If on No. 3 Platform Line, No. 4 Platform Line to be blocked, and vice versa. Platform 3 was still there in mid-1959 according to a dated photo in one of John Hunt’s Past and Present books
  8. I'm away from my books at the moment so can't check, but I'm pretty sure Reedsmouth's J36 had a turn to Scotsgap on the two daily passenger trains. I also think the J36 worked the fortnightly SO passenger Kielder/Keilder - Hexham and late night return until Reedsmouth shed closed. Stuart
  9. I think you are right and it's been ordered. Many thanks for the pointer. Stuart Thanks for the info. Stuart
  10. What is the DVD you mention, please? I've tried googling it without success. I too was a Grosmont resident back in the 60s/70s, using the line to get to school in Whitby, and definitely remember class 104 DMUs.
  11. 1966/67 WTT - 3L16 0500 Parcels from Preston, Kendal 0638/0643, Windermere 0703. 3L17 1120 Parcels from Lancaster, Oxenholme 1200/1212, Kendal 1217/1227, Windermere 1245 3L85 ECS (Vans) Windermere 1300, Kendal 1318, to work 1A65 1A65 SX 1820 Parcels Kendal to Kilburn High Road 1967 Summer WTT 6L25 SX Carnforth 0700, Kendal 0742/1025, Burneside R, Windermere 1050. 6L24 SX Carnforth 1338, Milnthorpe 1358/1430, Oxenholme 1446/1505, Kendal 1515/1612, Burneside 1620. 6P56 SO Kendal 1210, Milnethorpe 1235/1310, Carnforth 1327 8P56 SX Windermere 1240, Burneside 1300/1335, Kendal 134
  12. Just spent a fascinating couple of hours at this place (big thanks to Mrs S who spotted it in the Zagreb Times). HO exhibition layout with multi-level lines in effective mountain scenery including spiral and underfloor section (glass covered!). According to their flyer, 1000m of track and 100 trains with plans to extend downstairs into the basement via another spiral. Appropriate stock with locomotive (mostly German or Swiss as far as I could judge) which all ran very well and smoothly under DCC control. Couple of smaller layouts downstairs which you can have a go at driving - meant to enc
  13. During the mid-late 1940s, a Scarborough-Pickering goods and return was worked by a Dairycoates engine. B15s were used until they were all withdrawn (1947). In1949, still a Dairycoates engine with Scarborough men, Stuart (I also lived half a mile away at one point)
  14. Tony, Do you have Colin Mountford's book on the Bowes Railway? There are a couple of photos of Jarrow including an aerial shot? I think I acquired the book in the late 1970's when I moved to Durham, prior to moving to Shropshire 30 years ago Stuart
  15. In an outline planning permission application for housing on each side of the former LNWR Wellington-Stafford line at Donnington, the Rail Services part of the Transport Assessment states that the nearest rail station (at least they didn’t say train station) is 4.5km away at Oakengates. Fair enough It then goes on to describe Oakengates as being situated on the London (Paddington) to Birkenhead via Birmingham Snow Hill line. (Ghosts of Castles and chocolate and cream stock) It would be nice to know that the planners really did their research and didn’t just lift it straight fro
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.