RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 27, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 27, 2021 I was looking through some photos of the LNWR line from Parsley Hay to Ashbourne and, in a couple of photos of Hartington Station, I was surprised to see a Railcar in the bay. I now understand it to be a Wickham type. See photos below. (I can't credit pictures as I have no details). I understand that most of the Wickhams went to Scotland so I assume this is the additional railcar that was always used as a departmental unit by the Derby rail laboratory and is now in preservation please (on the Lavender line I believe)? It is not in standard livery so I did presume it is that one at first but cannot be sure. I wondered what it was doing at Hartington. There is no information on the Wickham web site so I can only assume it was there as part of its normal work. However this line would be due for closure shortly so probably not track testing but I guess their work covered more than that. I was already aware that a Park Royal unit worked the Buxton - Millers Dale service for a time and had initially wondered if it was that one but, of course, the livery is wrong and then I found out it is a Wickham not Park Royal. If anyone knows the story here it would help to assuage my curiosity please. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Moxy Posted December 27, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 27, 2021 It is the departmental Track Recording Coach, before it was renamed Laboratory 20. Some details here https://railcar.co.uk/images/wickham-railbus/departmental 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 27, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 27, 2021 1 hour ago, Moxy said: It is the departmental Track Recording Coach, before it was renamed Laboratory 20. Some details here https://railcar.co.uk/images/wickham-railbus/departmental Thanks. I was curious though as to what it was doing at Hartington as the line was due to close shortly and I would not have thought they would be track testing there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim.snowdon Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 19 minutes ago, highpeakman said: Thanks. I was curious though as to what it was doing at Hartington as the line was due to close shortly and I would not have thought they would be track testing there. Testing, or training? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 Did the High Peak Line still have rails at this date? Would have made a truly marvellous playground for things like adhesion trials on very steep gradients. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 28, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 28, 2021 13 hours ago, jim.snowdon said: Testing, or training? Good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 28, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 28, 2021 12 hours ago, Nearholmer said: Did the High Peak Line still have rails at this date? Would have made a truly marvellous playground for things like adhesion trials on very steep gradients. Hartington was on the Ashbourne line that parted from the C&HPR just after Parsley Hay so no major gradients (as far as I am aware). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted December 28, 2021 Share Posted December 28, 2021 But, could they still access the C&HP from there at this date? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 28, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 28, 2021 1 minute ago, Nearholmer said: But, could they still access the C&HP from there at this date? Yes, if it travelled back to Parsley Hay, certainly. So, Yes, it could indeed (possibly) have worked on that section of the C&HPR itself. I need to check back in my books for confirmation but I think that section of the C&HPR closed after the Ashbourne line had closed. Happy to be corrected. Also, of course, it may have been doing some testing of the C&HPR from Parsley Hay back to Buxton but that would have been the later LNWR line into Buxton (the section to Dowlow is still in use) so that's another possibility I guess. Could be many reasons of course. Just my curiosity set me wondering if anyone knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butler Henderson Posted December 28, 2021 Share Posted December 28, 2021 Buxton to Hartington remained open until 2 Oct 1967 ; the C&HPR was been fully closed by spring 1967. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Moxy Posted December 28, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 28, 2021 I've done a bit more digging. The date is 4 September 1962 and it's an SLS railtour. The steam loco is 42343. There are a couple more pictures here http://www.sutherland.davenportstation.org.uk/aaprint/ash.html Pictures ash-62-24 & ash-62-25. It still doesn't explain what the Wickham was doing there though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butler Henderson Posted December 28, 2021 Share Posted December 28, 2021 Presumably en route track recording, the line was a diversionary route. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 29, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 29, 2021 (edited) 22 hours ago, Moxy said: I've done a bit more digging. The date is 4 September 1962 and it's an SLS railtour. The steam loco is 42343. There are a couple more pictures here http://www.sutherland.davenportstation.org.uk/aaprint/ash.html Pictures ash-62-24 & ash-62-25. It still doesn't explain what the Wickham was doing there though. That's a really great set of photos that I haven't seen before. Thank you for posting that. I can actually remember seeing Tissington Station and some of the others on that route. Should have taken more notice but I was very young and could not afford film anyway. Edited December 29, 2021 by highpeakman Adding text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold highpeakman Posted December 29, 2021 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted December 29, 2021 20 hours ago, Butler Henderson said: Presumably en route track recording, the line was a diversionary route. OK. I wasn't aware of it being classed as a diversionary route. Thanks for the info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now