Jump to content
RMweb
 

Wickham Railcar question


highpeakman

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

I was looking through some photos of the LNWR line from Parsley Hay to Ashbourne and, in a couple of photos of Hartington Station, I was surprised to see a Railcar in the bay. I now understand it to be a Wickham type.

See photos below. (I can't credit pictures as I have no details). 


I understand that most of the Wickhams went to Scotland so I assume this is the additional railcar that was always used as a departmental unit by the Derby rail laboratory and is now in preservation please (on the Lavender line I believe)? It is not in standard livery so I did presume it is that one at first but cannot be sure.

 

I wondered what it was doing at Hartington. There is no information on the Wickham web site so I can only assume it was there as part of its normal work. However this line would be due for closure shortly so probably not track testing but I guess their work covered more than that.

 

I was already aware that a Park Royal unit worked the Buxton - Millers Dale service for a time and had initially wondered if it was that one but, of course, the livery is wrong and then I found out it is a Wickham not Park Royal. 

 

If anyone knows the story here it would help to assuage my curiosity please. Thanks.

 

hartingdon pic.JPG

hartington railway station wickham railcar.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Moxy said:

It is the departmental Track Recording Coach, before it was renamed Laboratory 20.

 

Some details here

 

https://railcar.co.uk/images/wickham-railbus/departmental

Thanks. 

I was curious though as to what it was doing at Hartington as the line was due to close shortly and I would not have thought they would be track testing there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
12 hours ago, Nearholmer said:

Did the High Peak Line still have rails at this date? Would have made a truly marvellous playground for things like adhesion trials on very steep gradients.

Hartington was on the Ashbourne line that parted from the C&HPR just after Parsley Hay so no major gradients (as far as I am aware). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 minute ago, Nearholmer said:

But, could they still access the C&HP from there at this date?

Yes, if it travelled back to Parsley Hay, certainly. So, Yes, it could indeed (possibly) have worked on that section of the C&HPR itself. I need to check back in my books for confirmation but I think that section of the C&HPR closed after the Ashbourne line had closed. Happy to be corrected.

 

Also, of course, it may have been doing some testing of the C&HPR from Parsley Hay back to Buxton but that would have been the later LNWR line into Buxton (the section to Dowlow is still in use) so that's another possibility I guess. ;)

 

Could be many reasons of course. Just my curiosity set me wondering if anyone knows. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I've done a bit more digging. The date is 4 September 1962 and it's an SLS railtour.  The steam loco is 42343.

 

There are a couple more pictures here

 

http://www.sutherland.davenportstation.org.uk/aaprint/ash.html

 

Pictures ash-62-24 & ash-62-25.

 

It still doesn't explain what the Wickham was doing there though.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
22 hours ago, Moxy said:

I've done a bit more digging. The date is 4 September 1962 and it's an SLS railtour.  The steam loco is 42343.

 

There are a couple more pictures here

 

http://www.sutherland.davenportstation.org.uk/aaprint/ash.html

 

Pictures ash-62-24 & ash-62-25.

 

It still doesn't explain what the Wickham was doing there though.

That's a really great set of photos that I haven't seen before. Thank you for posting that.

 

I can actually remember seeing Tissington Station and some of the others on that route. Should have taken more notice but I was very young and could not afford film anyway.

Edited by highpeakman
Adding text.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
20 hours ago, Butler Henderson said:

Presumably en route track recording, the line was a diversionary route.

OK. I wasn't aware of it being classed as a diversionary route. Thanks for the info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...