ianwales Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 Hi all Many years ago there was an article in the now defunct Scale Trains magazine on how to give Peco track a more "scale" appearance by removing some sleepers and re-spacing the remainder to give a more correct sleeper spacing. Does anyone still have the article and can tell me or can anyone remember how many sleepers need removing and what the remainder should be spaced at? Ian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukedog Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 Ian, Download the Forum's on line magazine "Modelling Inspiration" (Tab above) There is a feature in there, written by Andy Y I believe that gives details. Cheers! Frank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianwales Posted January 10, 2012 Author Share Posted January 10, 2012 Hi Frank Have done so, many thanks Ian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP OO Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Prototype track is 24 sleepers per 60ft length, or whatever the metric equivalent is. Easy enough to do. What's the problem? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Harvey Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 You see the difference in standard peco snd re-spaced if you use the link below? http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php/topic/13309-just-a-few-things-i-have-been-messing-with/ Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP OO Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 You see the difference in standard peco snd re-spaced if you use the link below? http://www.rmweb.co....n-messing-with/ Pete Is that to HO? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Harvey Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Both tracks are Peco Code 75 00 track. Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP OO Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Both tracks are Peco Code 75 00 track. Pete OK, but what scale? 4mm or 3.5mm [coz I can't tell from the pix]? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Y Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 What's the problem? For a newcomer you've achieved the unenviable record of getting three completely separate and independent peoples' backs up up this afternoon with your slapdash and potentially barbed comments which seem to tie in with your chosen username. We're taking the precaution of limiting your prolific annoyances from this point and no further posts will be seen on the site until checked by a member of the admin team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.