Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

Here we go. I think I'm quite probably certifiable for having a crack at this and I'm already late to the party so I'm going for a bite of the apple by making just the engine for a Great Western steam railmotor. The engines took longer to return to service than the rest of the vehicle and so they were often swapped out so that the whole unit was not kept off the rails too long. The engine consists of just the front bogie upon which the gertical boiler and firebix was mounted.

 

There was a railmotor service on the Thame branch so I can just about justify this, although it is certainly not a priority and so somewhat whimsical.

 

My understanding is that these engines had the smallest Walschaert valve gear of any engine and being a Great Western modeller I haven't had to worry myself with anything so complex before. Using J. Lewis' book on the steam railmotors as a reference I have constructed a CAD model to try to work out whether I have the sizes of the various linkages right and if there's enough width t fit everything in without it hanging out from the sides of the body when that is finally built. With a bit of luck there will be an embedded animation below (if not this should take you directly to it http://www.flickr.co...itt/7590330294/ ) and with a little more good will someone will be able to tell me whether it looks right or not? I think I need to limit the travel of the valve spindle to fully constrain the mechanism. Fortunately there is an upcoming outing to Pendon and Didcot and just maybe I will be able to see the real thing running up close to find out first hand how it should look when in motion.

 

 

<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="250" data="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=109786" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"> <param name="flashvars" value="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=b7ba6bcc74&photo_id=7590330294"></param> <param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=109786"></param> <param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=109786" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=b7ba6bcc74&photo_id=7590330294" height="250" width="400"></embed></object>

 

TTFN,

 

Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the prize for the smallest outside Walschaerts valve gear goes to the LSWR railmotors which were 0-2-2s with the cylinders and valve gear between the axles. The GW SRM is undoubtedly tiny, though. Geoff Jones built a model of the L&Y railmotors a good few years ago so may have some insights to offer. Good luck with the project.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're a brave man, Richard! One day, I'll do a SRM, but that will be in 4mm where the valve gear will be small enough, but doing it in 2mm will be a real challenge. On your animation, the eccentric seems to have worked loose as it does not rotate fully with the wheel. There are some other animations on Wikipedia and

which may help.

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I suspect the prize for the smallest outside Walschaerts valve gear goes to the LSWR railmotors which were 0-2-2s with the cylinders and valve gear between the axles. The GW SRM is undoubtedly tiny, though. Geoff Jones built a model of the L&Y railmotors a good few years ago so may have some insights to offer. Good luck with the project.

 

Geoff found the valve gear so challenging that, for years, it was only fitted on one side. Don't know if the other side is now done.

 

Jerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're a brave man, Richard! One day, I'll do a SRM, but that will be in 4mm where the valve gear will be small enough, but doing it in 2mm will be a real challenge. On your animation, the eccentric seems to have worked loose as it does not rotate fully with the wheel. There are some other animations on Wikipedia and

which may help.

 

Nick

 

Thanks Nick, The YouTube link was particularly useful because it slowed right down. I can see that my animation is wrong but I don't know why. Maybe I have something drawn the wrong size/shape when tracing from the scanned drawing. More probably there is a constraint that I haven't considered. I'm going on the afternoon excursion to Didcot with anyone else from RMWeb after the Pendon visit next weekend so hopefully after digesting the Wikipedia page and seeing the real thing I'll be able to get it right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I would be up for the challenge if you wanted anyone to test the bits out on...!

M :)

 

Me too, presumably you intend to do the rest of the railcar as well at some point. Which ones - the 70 footers hopefully!

 

Jerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The Didcot visit was most useful to this project and may also breed another if I can find an LED small enough. I have a lot of photos of bits of SRM. The cab is a very odd place to be, as you might imagine. With a bit of good fortune I should have some more drawings to be working from soon too.

 

I found out what was wrong with the animation: the eccentric needs to have a fixed angle relative to the wheel and is therefore permanently fixed to the crank pin. Doh! When I made this constraint in the model it locked the whole thing solid but that is because I had made a pin joint of something that needed a very small amount of vertical movement in addition to the rotation. I feel much happier about this now and should be able to move things forward soon.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

With thanks to some very helpful individuals I have more drawings. :-D Quite a lot of drawings in fact. My animated model has been corrected and looks much better! The next step is to check and validate the lengths and assembly orders for the motion components to achieve the compromise of fitting everything in the space and it looking something like the real thing. That will take some time with very little to show for it. After that there is the decision whether to draw and etch or mark out and cut. The latter might allow the links to be more true to form where some of the links have forked joints. Fluted rods are a pain to make though when compared with etching. It's not such a straightforward decision that one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Rich,

 

Make sure you open a topic in the Kit and Scratchbuilding Forum on this one - I will continue to enjoy this thread and report progress back to Graham and the No. 93 team on progress! Perhaps an application to the Moderators for a move is in order here?

 

All the best,

 

Castle

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll stick it somewhere on here, for sure. I need to get into the drawings properly and I know that the deadline is out of the question, especially with a week out for a holiday too. Most of my output is blogged, but I have enjoyed the input from the thread on the point disc so I could be tempted to try it again with another project.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...