Not sure how I should respond to this.
I just asked a question about the photo that you used, I did not say your methods were wrong. I had not come across a frontal photo of the model and only asked in case you had, so that you could refer me to the source so that I could see a frontal view.
Having thought about this, it appears that I focused on the word you used “Assume”. I interpreted this as a “best guess”, hence my use of the word arbitrary. Then when a wagon drawing was quoted in context of a locomotive, again misinterpretation on my part.
If we had had this conversation face to face the outcome would be totally different. The trouble with this medium is it is so one dimensional. Subject to the interpretation of the reader, without reference to other clues such as tone of voice or visual clues, (also on my part too quick to post a response before thinking it through).
My main thrust in all of this was to say that comparing photos and taking measurements came be somewhat subjective depending on ones viewpoint or experience.
Until someone can get hold of an actual model to measure it, the view taken will be subject to the persons perception of the photograph.
Some have stated that the head code box is the wrong size and I understand that you were trying to prove/disprove this.
Pete apologies for any misunderstanding between us, it was not my intention to upset you.
At least we both agree that we like what we see in the photo.