Jump to content
 

Titan

Members
  • Posts

    3,043
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Titan

  1. Reminds me of my time changing brake blocks on 309's at Clacton.  You never let two units out together that had just had their blocks changed, as it took a little while for the new blocks to bed in. So a freshly changed unit always went out with a part worn so the reduction in brake power on the first couple of applications was not too significant. Wonder if the drivers ever noticed that the brakes could often be a bit less strong until you got past Thorpe-le-Soken? There was mind you an incentive to do it right as often my train home was the one I had just re-blocked!

    • Like 4
  2. There have been a number of accidents in the UK due to inadequate brake power that would have been discovered if the driver had carried out a running brake test properly, but the brakes passed a stationary continuity test, and indeed would have passed a stationary continuity test after the accident if the train had not been spread all over the tracks...

    • Like 1
    • Agree 3
  3. 3 hours ago, kevinlms said:

    Yes, its raw bread that goes in and toast is the finished product!

     

    Raw bread is just dough. Don't think you would get toast out if you put that in a toaster!

    • Like 2
    • Funny 1
  4. 3 hours ago, rodent279 said:

    So a related question, that may have been asked on here before-why did the Metro-Vick type 2s use the unusual Co-Bo arrangement?

    Like wise the Brush type 2 - why use A1A-A1A, why not use 3 smaller traction motors in a Co-Co arrangement?

    (There are also some Japanese Co-Bo diesel locos, more for shunting & short trip work I think.)

    Probably maintenance costs. 4 larger motors are cheaper to maintain/buy than 6 smaller ones.  It is notable that the Co-Bo's were the only type 2 with more than 4 motors, and then only just! This however meant that they also had the highest TE of any type 2.

    • Like 1
  5. 22 hours ago, Edwin_m said:

    Are/were there any Bo-Bo-Bo diesels?  If so, where do they put the fuel tank?

    There are quite a few BR locos that don't have fuel tanks below the solebar, e.g. class 20 - between the cab and the engine room.  There were some locos that had a boxed in underframe to form a tank - think peaks and 31's had this arrangement, no doubt someone will correct me if I am wrong!

    • Informative/Useful 2
  6. I wonder if the MTK cab fronts are supposed to be identical or whether it is another packing error? I notice that you have gone to the trouble of removing the low roof seam that was only on the Motor coach following relocation of the pantograph. I think these units also only had jumpers on one end. Whilst not a problem in normal service, you would have to be careful about sending one to St. Botolphs (as was)

  7. On 19/10/2023 at 04:51, The Johnster said:

     

    I meant the use of 'my dearer' with dearer meaning more expensive as well as a rather poor pun on Madiera, not the lower hemispherical general knowledge of the existence of Madeira cake and it's common antipodean availability.  Unless of course you mean that your wife would object to paying £3 instead of £2 for my dearer cake, and who could blame her in these straightened times.  This is getting a bit surreal now...

     

    I'm quite partial to a nice slice of Madiera, my dear, but not if it's too dear.  Oh dear!

     

    Would it still be too deer if it cost you two bucks?

    • Like 1
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
    • Round of applause 2
    • Funny 2
    • Friendly/supportive 1
×
×
  • Create New...