Wild Boar Fell

8 hours ago, The Pilotman said:

The pictures were taken at Reading, so I think the poster has posted them on the grounds that that’s not somewhere that that stock/livery would normally be seen. 

Sorry yeah that's correct, well away from the normal or intended stomping grounds of the Mk4s, the set in question was actually on one of two overnight test runs. 67008 in TfW colours was on the other end but unfortunately didn't get a photo.

An open access operator had proposed to use Mk4s on the GWML, but they are now planning to use AT300s IIRC.

When you model the GWML, but want to show off your (Ex ECML now WCML) Mk4s, but you forgot your matching 90 so you stuck a TfW 67 on it.

On 01/11/2022 at 08:26, JackB95 said:

Are there any updates @Wild Boar Fell? Remembered about this layout yesterday and was hoping to see some updates, but guess things are busy at your end with life.

Cheers Jack, unfortunately not much has changed with the layout, it is currently packed away having recently moved counties. Hopefully the layout is still mostly intact. I did recently have chance to help operate one of the Warrington club's layouts at their exhibition so a few items from my fleet got a shakedown then.

My pair turned up today (DVTs 26 & 29), I must say they do look smart and fortunately doesn't seem to have and QC issues that I can see.

But the first thing that strikes me (not assisted by the underframe colour being grey admittedly) is just how toy like the chassis is, it just doesn't look 'sharp'. I am not trying to have a go at the manufacturer, just expected the model to be comparible to the very good Mk3 DVT. 

I've put in some shots for comparison (I know the underframes are different, but just to compare the approaches), fastening detail, printed detail, even the BIS is a separate part on the Mk3, not so on the Mk4 which has is molded in neither the on or off position on the Non-Drivers Side. Also worth noting that the Mk3 DVT has wire handrails and opening doors.

All in all, more than a little disappointed to be honest. The Mk3 DVTs were up there with the Class 60, this feels like Railroad Range. 

But that's just my opinion.

On 20/08/2022 at 10:19, JackB95 said:

 

I've not seen any LNER buffets about yet, so guess they're still enroute.

 

 

Yeah, certainly the lamp iron is missing. Not sure where the UIC sockets are? The front end buffer beam sockets seem to be all in place. Holyhead stickers can thankfully be purchased from Railtec transfers. As for the bogies, whilst naturally I'd agree with the bogies being black, this photo here shows that they appear to be the same colour (albeit maybe very slightly darker) as the lower bodyside... 

 

 

 

I'm rather hoping someone will make the advertising liveries to go on the side of the DVTs. I'm quite fond of the RNLI one myself.

Realised I hadn't posted this yet, from Flickr

For anyone modelling the TfWR rakes, remember that the formation changed between the training runs and them entering service (the TO moved).

3 minutes ago, JackB95 said:

 

I've not seen any LNER buffets about yet, so guess they're still enroute.

 

 

Yeah, certainly the lamp iron is missing. Not sure where the UIC sockets are? The front end buffer beam sockets seem to be all in place. Holyhead stickers can thankfully be purchased from Railtec transfers. As for the bogies, whilst naturally I'd agree with the bogies being black, this photo here shows that they appear to be the same colour (albeit maybe very slightly darker) as the lower bodyside... 

 

 

 

I'm rather hoping someone will make the advertising liveries to go on the side of the DVTs. I'm quite fond of the RNLI one myself.

The UICs are just out board of the Main Res pipes in the linked image (you can see one just below the driver's side buffer). 

I'll post a link to a good photo of it later, but the bogies do appear grey in a lot of images, but are actually black/very dark grey as per LNER service.

39 minutes ago, JackB95 said:

 

A simple mod for you and me, and even easier if the artwork was sent to the factory to make sure it was black from the word go. Yet to see anyone's LNER/TfW DVTs up and running with lights, so I hope that the outer markers are there for decoration. Still...

Looking forward to my TfWR pair arriving, but agree there are a few things that aren't right, looks like the front lamp iron and UIC sockets are missing. The bogies should be black (they weren't repainted when the bodysides were). Headlight clusters as you say, also appears to be wrong. It would have been nice to also have some printed/painted detail on the underframe such as the yellow behind the BIS. The DVTs also very quickly gained Holyhead depot stickers. I've not seen any photos that show whether any representation of the push-pull equipment (for 67s) has been added on this or the coaches.

The livery of DVT and coaches is correct for approximately Feb 2020 to May 2021 between delivery to TfWR and entry into service.

2 hours ago, Simon Bendall said:

The main issue is the couplings which within a set are a tightlock variant with the brake connections built into them. Only the TOE and the DVT have conventional drawgear (drophead buckeye, separate brake pipes) at the outer ends.

The brake connections are not part of the tightlock (or Alliance) coupler. They have conventional pipes with gladhands.

Agree that the gangways would not be compatible. Electrically the vehicles would be incompatible due to the systems used on a Mk4. ETS wise you could connect to other LHCS.

Last time I went to BN was in Q1 (January I think) 2019 and it had already become a Hitachi depot, with most staff transferred across. At the time the depot had been prepared for Azumafication, but I think the units there were for familiarisation, with the active ones working out of Doncaster Carr.

As for the remaining sets, I think they were withdrawn during 2020 from Bounds, and reentered service from Neville Hill a few months ago (during the Hitachi crisis).

Hello Steve,

Thanks for asking, unfortunately I am not planning to continue this project further with the Bachmann model now being imminent/available (out of the loop sorry).

Leopald is quite correct that even though the price at the time was high, the issue was a distinct bowing of the structure. Earlier this year I had been experimenting with a new machine, which is having similar issues on smaller prints.

Kind Regards,

Wild Boar Fell

On 05/07/2021 at 16:37, meld said:

Reposting this message here in the hope that you will see it ...

 

start edited Quote ...

"3 Spindle Parrot wagon Kit

 

  ( 2 members active in this conversation (including you) ).

 

Wild Boar Fell 
Not read yet

 

meld
Read: Just now

 

Started conversation: May 18

Hi Matthew,

 

I was about to order another of your 3 spindle Parrot wagons, but now see that I.Materialise  show this now as not for sale.

 

Is there any chance this is an error, I would really like to order more, and I know of a couple of others people who would like to do the same.

 

Railtec do a sheet of transfers for these wagons to help with the finishing of them.

 

Meld" ... end edited Quote

 

Hello Meld,

My apologies for not getting back to you sooner, I've just had a luck and unfortunately it is the case that I.materialise won't make the 3 spindle variant. I believe they had a few issues producing them on the last batch.

Kind Regards, 

Wild Boar Fell

On 25/06/2021 at 16:43, QuoitsPlayer said:

More pictures in this week's engine shed:

https://uk.Hornby.com/community/blog-and-news/engine-shed/marked-progress 

 

Not a Mk4 expert but they look good and I'd query if the new coupling is a Hornby version of Hunt Couplings. The close coupling looks very good

Looking good,

Although hoping that Hornby have an alternative end tooling for at least the TOE on the TfWR vehicles. In theory all other (TfWR) vehicles should be missing the aero baffles on the non-drivers side (relative to the DVT cab).

Also noted is the WiFi connection on the TOE sample shown, which is correct for the post Mallard vehicles Hornby are now doing I believe. 

I also note these have the later Virgin style horn grille, I believe in this era they also had clipped buffers.

Still finally glad to get some for Bank Quay.

1 hour ago, montyburns56 said:

 

I think it's because Cruise prefers practical effects on his films, that's why he's often doing the mad stunts for real.

Supposedly he's also going to do some filming on the International Space Station, although not for a future Mission Impossible.

Just when I thought we'd seen the end of the 150 hybrids.

42 minutes ago, KeithHC said:

Article in Railway Gazette the whole fleet is being returned to Portabrook this must mean the end for the 442. Reason being the effects of COVID-19.

 

Keith

Unlikely they will be returning to Porterbrook, being owned by Angel...

4 hours ago, kipford said:

Don't recall ever seeing Bombardier Signage before. They are a Canadian company though, so daddy may be having an influence.

I think Bombardier sponsored Racing Point last season, or maybe Stroll in particular. Seem to remember commenting on seeing it. My thought at the time was the Canadian connection.

16 minutes ago, Gibbo675 said:

Hi There,

 

My observations are two fold, firstly the rocket again went KA-BOOM fine style, which would suggest to even the most casual of observers that it is indeed, "a load of rubbish that doesn't function correctly" when they attempt to land it as they do. Secondly, If this is how they intend to land on Mars then good luck to them, it will be worth every penny of someone else's money should they like the idea of a one way ticket to oblivion.

 

Gibbo.

Just to clarify, the failure in the video was a Falcon 9, the first failure of one in over a year. I believe some have been re used 7 or 8 times now.

Starship has failed 2/2 landings, but is a completely different vehicle to the Falcon. Also with a completely different engine technology. Just development,  but very public 

A very quick and crude test print of the original CAD file, please note that I am aware of quite a few issues with the print, which I hope to steadily resolve. Post printing I have not cleaned up the support marks and it has had a quick blast of primer and black. Therefore this is not representative of a finalised tender print. 

Kind Regards, 

Wild Boar Fell

As it happens in the last few days decided to try and return to 3D printing with a new machine. 

I have tried the first few print on it today and have included the above tender body in the test prints. I will aim to post a photo tomorrow of the result, it needs some optimisation (it wasn't designed for this technology) but shows some promise. 

I can't say at this stage whether I'll go into production or not when finished. 

Kind Regards,

Wild Boar Fell

Not a proper update, but '412 is currently in for weathering. The loco still needs new plates, lamp irons and warning flashes, but rather please with how it has turned out so far. The weathering is based on photos of the loco from 1999/2000.

Horrible close ups...

Wild Boar Fell

POS was Pullman Open Smoking.

There are still the partitions but not the doors from what I remember. Seem to recall the TOE had similar at the loco end of the saloon.

Data panels do match the Evesholt website, I have photos of each panel type somewhere.

18 hours ago, AndrewB7585 said:

Here are the CAD images from the Hornby catalog. Looks good to me 

That TOE is looking sharp, looking at the end detail, I would say as shown there was for a vehicle post Wi-Fi fitment but pre 67/ Wales conversion.

34 minutes ago, Global said:

I’m just wondering what period the InterCity Mk4s are being portrayed as? 

I thought when new the buffet was a first not a standard and I’m not sure the was a first disabled toilet either?

 

When was the buffet turned around? I thought it was in GNER days? 

I believe both changes were made about the time of the Mallard refurbs, from memory some time between 2001 -2003.

Happy to be corrected