Jump to content
 

FelixM

Members
  • Posts

    372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FelixM

  1. So this is my view.

     

    1) Details that cannot be seen from normal viewing angle are not that important so keep them as a relief. That's what I would do if I had a model railway company.

     

    2&3) Bin the idea of sprung buffers and concentrate on includinng a close coupling mechanism with NEM pockets. That's the best way to get reliable operation with a realistic look.

     

    4) Compensated suspension sounds mouth watering, espacially for so little money. I'd say yes.

     

    5) The most realistic I have seen is to use Woodland Scenics ballast filled in. It's best used with short couplings because then you can lift the wagon out of the train and pour its load back into where it came from.

  2. I think it's a better approach to regard this new release as an actual 12T tank wagon in fictional liveries than to look at what type of wagon should there be for the liveries announced.

    That said – I welcome added diversity to early tankers available RTR and this extends to this new Oxford Rail wagon. Personally I can live with a non-authentic livery but that has to be decided by each on his own.

    I recommend reading "Oil on the Rails" of HMRS publication, you get the idea of tank wagons tailored to the needs of oil firms very much from this book.

  3. Dave

     

    Bachmann is currently looking for a Senior project engineer for their Hongkong team:

    http://news.Bachmann.co.uk/2018/01/project-engineer/

     

    The requirements seem quite steep to me. How do you judge the scene of potential applicants? Roughly how many applications will they receive? 50? Two? Ten? Did you often get new colleagues when still working with Dapol? Would you personally be interested hadn't it been for DJModels? (Just curious asking, no offence intended)

     

    Regards

    Felix

  4. Hi all,

     

    does someone know where the main reservoir tanks of the Westinghouse brake are located on A1X Terriers? A friend of mine is building a 7mm model of GWR No. 5 Portishead and would like to know where these should be sited and to which orientation, if at all visible. I am passing the question on his behalf.

     

    His model:

    29515629dw.jpg

     

    29515626cu.jpg

     

    Thanks in advance

    Felix

    • Like 1
  5. As you can see the Kadee in the picture is set to a gap of 1mm between corridor connectors. That is close enough not to distract the eye.
     
    Retaining the wrong coupler height gives unreliable connection to the loco if the coupler pocket on the coupler is at the correct height. Furthermore, if you run long rakes the close coupling mechanism can turn into a disadvantage as it increases the play, especially in long rakes or when pushing (OK, pushing does not apply to Mk1 does it).

     

    Having fixed rakes is uncomfortable for some of us as well.

    27984100812_ae71160506_c.jpg
    Short on locos by – FelixM –, auf Flickr

×
×
  • Create New...