Jump to content
 

Sotto

Members
  • Posts

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sotto

  1. On 03/08/2020 at 02:57, Wheres_Wally said:

    I was told by someone in the motor industry that for quality go for a car built on a robot production line. Hand made cars can be 3/4 inch different in lengths between the sides.

    It's not just cars and models!

     

    I was told not so long ago by some builders of fast jets that the F35 Lightning was the first jet that left their factory with an absolutely straight fuselage. Previous efforts like the Eurofighter (Typhoon) were built banana shaped so on first flight would display natural tendency to turn left/turn right/climb/descend which had to be calibrated out by adjusting controls so that input equalled output.

  2. Going back to the start of this topic, I think there is something in the OP's point, even if it was partly just intended to spark off a discussion (a success if so!). It is about the options  out there, now that O gauge is so much more affordable.

     

    Most (all) of us are constrained by some blend of budget, space, and modelling time/skill. If for example you have a space of 9 ft by 2 feet and a budget of say £750, you could build something interesting in N, OO, or O. It won't  be the same thing in each scale, but it can give just as much pleasure, perhaps to different people. Not N for me- too small and fiddly!

     

    Of course there comes a point with reducing budget that OO is the best option, owing to lower prices and the availability of so much used stuff.  

     

    And for me any one of several large Heljan O gauge diesels would be preferable to the OO gauge BP, and pricewise they are in the same ballpark. But that's just me. And for that matter- just me at the moment.- If I had a circuit big enough for the BP I might think differently....... Although then I'd want a circuit big enough for a 10 coach train in O....

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...