Jump to content
 

TJ52

Members
  • Posts

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TJ52

  1. Good to see you back William. I suppose it all depends on what you want as an outcome. Is a continuous circuit a given, or would you be happy with end to end? There is always the option of sitting and watching trains go by, not forgetting the opportunity to run in engines over a long distance. I get the impression that for you it is the building and operating that is more important. I may be wrong of course.

     

    Terry

  2. Hi William,

     

    A lovely photo of Haywards Heath station.

     

    I have a suggestion. You have spent a lot of time thinking and planning along the lines of a HV/Minories concept. You have also said that a purpose built shed for the railway could follow in the fullness of time. As 4mm is the more viable option for the LCDR era how about building at least part of your terminus (or another segment of a larger layout) in the spare bedroom while building and accumulating the relevant stock? When you are in a position to move outdoors you would then have a head start on a full layout. I get the impression that the building of a model gives you at least as much pleasure of operation.

     

    By the way, I'm just around the corner from you in Lindfield, so if you ever need another pair of hands to help move stuff feel free to ask.

     

    Good luck,

     

    Terry

  3. Jack, I have the original edition of the HMRS livery register for the LSWR and Southern Railway. It makes no mention of any changes to dark brown and red ends, the only note about wartime changes being the decision in 1942 to reduce painting of wagons to a minimum and metal parts to be painted black. However, this book dates from 1970 so there must be more recent research!

     

    Cheers,

     

    Terry

  4. William, I can't remember if you have said this previously but is this intended to be a home layout just operated by yourself, or a home layout with several operators or an an exhibition layout? I love the idea of Edwardian trains but together with the task of building the stock needed there is also the complexities of movement. The 1925-39 option would seem to give a great variety of stock but also a simpler timetable. Of course, once you have laid third rail there could be no changing the period backwards.

     

    Your researches and deliberations have made for fascinating reading, but of course in the end it's your railway. I hope that whatever decision you come to results in a railway that satisfies you.

     

    All the best,

     

    Terry

    • Agree 1
  5. If I remember rightly, when the GOG forum was started it automatically put your membership number on it. I've never bothered to change it but obviously others have.

     

    While I am a long time member I have been saddened and appalled by the tactics and behaviour of most of the current management to try to ensure that they or their cronies are elected at the forthcoming AGM. Most unlikely that I'll be renewing my membership. As many have pointed out, there is very little benefit to being a member that anyone new to O Gauge can't find online or with other organisations. The GOG simply hasn't moved with the times and most those in charge do not want change.

     

    Terry

    • Like 3
    • Agree 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
×
×
  • Create New...