Jump to content
 

Wickham Green

Members
  • Posts

    3,126
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Wickham Green

  1. 11 hours ago, 30851 said:

     

    But to go back to the question now I have seen all of it one possibility that if it is 1960 then it might have been a special to test the new MK1 Pullmans as they were delivered 60-61.

     

    Unlikely to be a test run from Metro Cammell in Brum - unless there was some particular reason they had to be checked-out on York ( by top brass p'raps ? ).

  2. 4 hours ago, LBRJ said:

    Pacers are only fitted with single glazed window units,  unlike most modern trains.

    I was once on an HST from St.Austell to Pad ( which, incidentally, has probably never seen a Pacer ) and we suffered a broken window just after Plymouth : the conductor cordoned off the area completely 'for safety reasons' - and cordoned us off from the Travelling Chef in the process ........................ I'd not been able to get close enough to assess the damage myself but my suspicions were confirmed when a couple of guys knocked out the remains of the outer window pane at Newton and the train was allowed to proceed ...... and the passengers were then allowed to discover what little the Chef still had to offer. ( Yes, I do still think of HSTs as modern trains.)

    • Like 1
  3. I got works drawings for the 'L' from the erstwhile BR/OPC joint venture a number of yonks ago - so I guess the 'L1' will be available from the NRM ............ otherwise, there are drawings from Skinley ( not one of his best if I remember )  and in Jim Russell's book ....... probably from Ian Beattie in the Muddler at some time, too.

  4. 15 hours ago, caradoc said:

     

    ........ How about a Satnav system that displays a warning when a lorry is past the point of no return towards a low bridge, or other obstruction ? ...........

     

    Or better still shouts "STOP, YOU IDIOT" at the driver ....... or is wired into the controls to bring the vehicle to a gradual halt.

    • Like 1
    • Funny 2
  5. 42 minutes ago, kevinlms said:

    Not quite sure that this is the correct place for this level crossing breech by the train driver in Australia, but if the mods want to move it, that's OK by me.

     

    https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/train-driver-s-nicotine-withdrawal-blamed-for-level-crossing-blunder-20200115-p53rqo.html

    Frightening to hear that a relatively civilised country like Oz hadn't got "a protection system .... that could stop trains that pass signals at danger." installed !

    • Agree 2
  6. 19 hours ago, cctransuk said:

     

    Because, as I've no doubt Tony Wright would say, it'd be 'yours'.

     

    So why the hell should we bother with ready to run at all if we're all happy to have a layout populated with the few things - which are 'ours' - that we've managed to build in our lunchtimes ? ............ and, perhaps anyone who who is happy to live only with rolling stock that's 'theirs' are wasting their time on this thread ..... and wasting everyone else' time too !

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  7. 1 hour ago, pete_mcfarlane said:

    PDK do an L1. The DJH kit is for an E1 - they actually sell it as a "D1/E1" despite the different wheelbases of the two loco. Simpler times.....

    ...... and the DJH "D1/E1" has a boiler that's far too big for either a D1 or E1 ......... and even too large for an L1 ! : not one of their best kits !

  8. 16 hours ago, phil-b259 said:

     

     

    That wasn’t done for luggage reasons - the original Pullman brake coaches we some of the oldest Pullman carriages in use so BR withdrew them and used a BG instead. 

     

    In the final year of the Belle at least one of the BGs was in the cooperate blue and grey - not sure if the livery carried when they were first used was maroon or green.

    I don't think any BGs ever carried green livery (?).

  9. 15 hours ago, pH said:

     

    Caradoc, is my memory correct that Duchesses could not be piloted over the bridge into Glasgow Central? (Despite the photo that I linked to above!) I seem to remember that any engine piloting a Duchess on a down train was removed alongside Polmadie shed.

    This - and the two Kings  - might have been a matter of overhang on curvature and the risk of buffer locking ?

  10. But why on earth should anyone faff about building one at lunchtime IF the - no doubt superior - one might land on their doormat the next day ? ............ particularly as they may well have other projects - to scratch or kit build - that they'd rather spend the time on : wagons - or whatever - that HAVEN'T been promised by the trade ( yet ).

    • Agree 2
  11. 18 hours ago, cctransuk said:

     

    I refuse to believe that the decision whether to build a particular layout is dependent on the availability or otherwise of a particular road van. ....................

    Of course not - but if someone's invested lots of dosh in a suitable locomotive and rake of wagons in the aeons since they put their name down for a brakevan to complete their train, they can only feel peeved if they're not being told when ( if ) it's going to appear.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  12. 1 hour ago, Nick Holliday said:

    The L1 class seems to be a little unloved, as photos of them are relatively rare. They suffer, perhaps, from being what was effectively a pre-grouping design built by one of the big four. There are several other classes that seem to have suffered from this lack of interest. Bradley, in his RCTS works, included them in his SECR section, and doesn't even mention them in his first volume of Southern built locos! ............................

    Yes, Bradley lumps all the mogul family in the SECR volume too - even the W class which didn't appear 'til 1932 !  ( Odder still, perhaps, is inclusion of the 'G' class in the LCDR volume !

×
×
  • Create New...