Jump to content
 

GRASinBothell

Members
  • Posts

    291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GRASinBothell

  1. I rather like the tinprinted buildings. I have one of the Hornby E2E engine sheds, as well as a modern Darstaed single-road shed (though I'm not at all sure how I can cram the latter in to my layout!). On those, the tinprinting is just the building. I'm less keen on buildings like Hornby's station, where they included people, luggage, and scenery.

     

    Gordon

  2. The Terrier has a lower buffer beam than other locos (note how the shank protrudes above the beam), so I've rather assumed the reason for the lack of a drop-link is to prevent it shorting on the centre rail...

    I've obtained ETS couplers from Raylo (Colin Toten), but those are designed to avoid having to cut a slot in the bufferbeam (which was what I wanted, to convert a Jep STEF refrigerated van).

    Gordon

    • Like 1
  3. Regarding the question of whether any coaches like that existed, remember that the standard way of repairing panelled coaches was steel flush panelling to cover the deteriorating woodwork. While most pictures I've seen have only covered part of the coach, it's not impossible that some may have had the entire side sheeted in this way.

    So, while none were built like that, it's not entirely impossible for one or two to have ended up not looking too dissimilar.

    Well, that would be my excuse if I had one... :jester:

     

    Gordon

    • Like 3
  4. Kevin,

    I was wondering whether your acquisition was before or after my posting, so I have the answer. Glad the suggestion was useful.

    Until my acquisition of several at Christmas, I only had a couple of Harry Potter figures, but I found that at exhibitions those were what the children gravitated to (well, that and the dinosaur figures, but the less said about them the better!).

    Gordon

    • Like 1
  5. I thought that one of the key reasons for the under-scale track gauge in OO was the need to obtain adequate clearance between the over-width wheels and cylinders, and for the outside motion (especially considering the extra sideplay needed for the sharp curves in use).

    British locos also tended to have their driving wheels covered by splashers, which would need to be made wider to cover over-width wheels, whereas many other countries embraced the "everything on show" approach, thus avoiding that particular problem.

     

    Gordon

  6. Thanks for the explanation, Brian. Like Kevin, I've wondered why the National Coal Board had milk floats...

    I have a cream NCB one in a similar state to Kevin's. If I ever get to repaint it, I'll go for the Job's Dairy transfers, as my grandmother in Twickenham got her milk from them.

    Regarding Models of Yesteryear, the table of scales doesn't include some recent ones, including YSH1 Gypsy Caravan from 1993 and YSH2 London Omnibus (also horse-drawn) from 1995. Based on the figures on them, they appear to be 1/43-ish, though the gypsy caravan is possibly a little larger.

    Gordon

  7. If you're having difficulty fitting it all into the length available, I wonder if you've considered a solution like what was used at Ventnor? They had a turntable to release the loco onto the run-around loop. And between the line on which the train came in and the run-around loop was an island platform. They had a contraption like a gangplank to get from the main platform to the island, though I never saw it used. Of course, this wasn't a common arrangement (but then, nor was having the line go straight into a tunnel on leaving the terminus, which Ventnor also does, and that hasn't deterred modellers!). I gather the Great Eastern was also prone to using this space-saving arrangement.

     

    Gordon

×
×
  • Create New...